i am not against changing our diet per say. i can envision a future where we eat more bugs/algae proxies. when playing cyber punk i saw an ad for pizza with “REAL peperoni crickets” or something, and wile i know it’s out there to shock the player, the more i think about it the more i embrace it.
in this case i declare broken clock protocols, and know that this is a symptom to larger rot in society, but our current way of life was never sustainable, nor particularly healthy.
if you want to alter the trolley problem go ahead and make your claim, but do not attempt to twist the trolley problem and assume my results. your straw man insinuation is dis-honest
to not pull the lever, the puller considers their culpability in the harm caused by their intervention. “morality is determined by the action.”
where as those who pull the lever decide on the morality by the amount of harm. “morality is determined by the results”
the ones who abstain on pulling the lever are not making a moral choice of the situation, they are preventing an action that can cause harm and assigning blame of the greater situations harm on someone else. a very self centered consideration.
i find it convenient that at the same time that AI cluster supposedly broke out of their “secure” sand box and “hacked” huggingface, “on their own”, as the AI ceo’s all individually wrote a paper about how there should be legislation constricting ai development in very specific yet seemingly the exact same ways, then they all had a meeting to agree on how to lobby the government, at the same time i am getting paid anti ai advertisements and news articles.
it will not happen. assuming the democrats win, they will use him to score points with years long congressional hearings, allowing him freedom to do what ever he wants, including leaving the country. and the democrats will use these worthless hearings to hide the fact they are at best doing nothing to fix the damage at worse continue to govern at the behest of the same doners the republicans had, and trump will die of old age, free, possibly playing golf.
and yet they do not have the capability to win a fight against the populous. not even the military.
what’s the militaries track record for winning a war against an insurgency? it’s it once in 100 years? with a protected military industrial complex separated by an ocean. with the worlds most advanced weapons. with unlimited arms budget. with the best training, with the best logistics, there was no advantage the us military didn’t have, and yet we have lost every war against an insurgency except one.
and you argue for capitulation to tyranny with out even trying, embarrassing.
no one ever said it would be fun, or convenient. but i would appreciate you to not stand in the way when there is talk of resistance.
if that’s so then representing this as the troley problem is EXTRA poiniant.
the troley problem is a problem, because it’s answer is debated. with the whole argument being either utilitarian, or deontology.
you just validated everyone who didn’t vote, good jorb there.
and as a utilitarian myself, i have to give you guys props on that self own. because you altered the trolly problem, the only valid options are deontology, or building the track away from the D. amazing jorb
yea, bullshit. you don’t believe what people tell you on the internet do you? how hard would it be to alter the text of a gpt output? don’t even need ai or photo shop
i know there is a whole crusade against /s posting. that bereft of social clues one would have in an actual conversation, somehow people should just intuit the sarcastic nature of crazy replies…
but we have motherfuckers shooting horse dewormer up their ass, we have the head of the doj arguing that people should not be denied jobs for doing bestiality, because they might have been forced to under gun point. just do yourself and the rest of us a favor and just use the /s
i am so tired of having to parse all this bullshit.
what do you mean? i thought the big upset was that pizza cake was relentless on their stance that there was a genocide happening. was it just not blunt enough before now?
the police in america are not more armed then the people. peacefull resistance is * checks news * yea it is not working.
slow would imply forward progress, not full on degradation the likes of which has never been seen before.
any talk of kowtowing to tyranny because any actual action would justify the actual harm they are already committing is bullshit. if they needed justification, they would manufacture it. they did it already, and we are past the point they even try to justify anything
past resistance has been white washed to promote the peaceful and easily controlled actions, and demonized the ‘radical’ movements when the only reason the peaceful actions got any traction was the presented alternative.
the government eating itself was not a victory of the peaceful resistance! the same way claiming a boycott killed a company because it was bought out by a venture capitalist. the disassembling and destruction of the business for profit was the whole point!!!
we are not winning we are not moving in the correct direction and in the mean time people are dieing all over the world! fuck all the way off.
sure, but most games don’t respect over all darkness anyway. it’s looking day for night everywhere i go, and that’s being heavy handed on the darkness differs
the criticism comes from a place where he has consistently missed his potential, and he is over rated due to this, it goes into hack status when he gets high on his own supply. if i didn’t care deeply for his work i would not care enough to have such a strong opinion.
his self indulgence in these accolades should not be encouraged, and he should not be given infinite time, infinate money, and infinite control on a project unless you expect him to continue to succumb to his problems of meandering story, overspending, and spectacal at the cost of the narrative.
he is an artist, a visionary, and a hack, and sometimes art is defined by its constraints
and i have done these things, and i see no difference.
you push for individual culpability through othering and alienation to force collectivism, absurdity on nonsense.
just the notion alone that in order to achieve collectivism one must alone shoulder the burden of systematic change separately is oxymoronic and a waste of time.
do you just assume that people don’t do as you say because they are inherently evil? they actually seek their end?
all this nagging does’nt seem to be convincing me to agree with you after all
jesus tap dancing christ.
the speed at which a vegan IMMEDIATELY shot me down as not good enough has to have been precognition.
but sure, yea, whatever, beans and other plants we are already eating should probably be involved and be more prominent in our diets.
damn!
i am not against changing our diet per say. i can envision a future where we eat more bugs/algae proxies. when playing cyber punk i saw an ad for pizza with “REAL peperoni crickets” or something, and wile i know it’s out there to shock the player, the more i think about it the more i embrace it.
in this case i declare broken clock protocols, and know that this is a symptom to larger rot in society, but our current way of life was never sustainable, nor particularly healthy.
if you want to alter the trolley problem go ahead and make your claim, but do not attempt to twist the trolley problem and assume my results. your straw man insinuation is dis-honest
no, that is the incorrect answer,
to not pull the lever, the puller considers their culpability in the harm caused by their intervention. “morality is determined by the action.”
where as those who pull the lever decide on the morality by the amount of harm. “morality is determined by the results”
the ones who abstain on pulling the lever are not making a moral choice of the situation, they are preventing an action that can cause harm and assigning blame of the greater situations harm on someone else. a very self centered consideration.
i find it convenient that at the same time that AI cluster supposedly broke out of their “secure” sand box and “hacked” huggingface, “on their own”, as the AI ceo’s all individually wrote a paper about how there should be legislation constricting ai development in very specific yet seemingly the exact same ways, then they all had a meeting to agree on how to lobby the government, at the same time i am getting paid anti ai advertisements and news articles.
you are doing a great job.
it will not happen. assuming the democrats win, they will use him to score points with years long congressional hearings, allowing him freedom to do what ever he wants, including leaving the country. and the democrats will use these worthless hearings to hide the fact they are at best doing nothing to fix the damage at worse continue to govern at the behest of the same doners the republicans had, and trump will die of old age, free, possibly playing golf.
and yet they do not have the capability to win a fight against the populous. not even the military.
what’s the militaries track record for winning a war against an insurgency? it’s it once in 100 years? with a protected military industrial complex separated by an ocean. with the worlds most advanced weapons. with unlimited arms budget. with the best training, with the best logistics, there was no advantage the us military didn’t have, and yet we have lost every war against an insurgency except one.
and you argue for capitulation to tyranny with out even trying, embarrassing.
no one ever said it would be fun, or convenient. but i would appreciate you to not stand in the way when there is talk of resistance.
if that’s so then representing this as the troley problem is EXTRA poiniant.
the troley problem is a problem, because it’s answer is debated. with the whole argument being either utilitarian, or deontology.
you just validated everyone who didn’t vote, good jorb there.
and as a utilitarian myself, i have to give you guys props on that self own. because you altered the trolly problem, the only valid options are deontology, or building the track away from the D. amazing jorb
the REAL world has the election far enough out that preemptive adoption of a genocide is an unnecessary evil.
the REAL world has the D also with the same heads on the rail as R.
the REAL world has idiots posting this as a trolley problem, thus validating everyone who didn’t vote.
the REAL world has people using propaganda like this, who’s REAL goal is the continuation of genocide.
yea, bullshit. you don’t believe what people tell you on the internet do you? how hard would it be to alter the text of a gpt output? don’t even need ai or photo shop
i mean i already got the email that stated that i didn’t make the cut…. OP i got bad news for you…
now if only i had news about my steam controller order
seems to me that actively sabotaging any effort into making a connection to the third track so that no one has to die is a REAL ass hole move.
i know there is a whole crusade against /s posting. that bereft of social clues one would have in an actual conversation, somehow people should just intuit the sarcastic nature of crazy replies…
but we have motherfuckers shooting horse dewormer up their ass, we have the head of the doj arguing that people should not be denied jobs for doing bestiality, because they might have been forced to under gun point. just do yourself and the rest of us a favor and just use the /s
i am so tired of having to parse all this bullshit.
what do you mean? i thought the big upset was that pizza cake was relentless on their stance that there was a genocide happening. was it just not blunt enough before now?
the police in america are not more armed then the people. peacefull resistance is * checks news * yea it is not working.
slow would imply forward progress, not full on degradation the likes of which has never been seen before.
any talk of kowtowing to tyranny because any actual action would justify the actual harm they are already committing is bullshit. if they needed justification, they would manufacture it. they did it already, and we are past the point they even try to justify anything
past resistance has been white washed to promote the peaceful and easily controlled actions, and demonized the ‘radical’ movements when the only reason the peaceful actions got any traction was the presented alternative.
the government eating itself was not a victory of the peaceful resistance! the same way claiming a boycott killed a company because it was bought out by a venture capitalist. the disassembling and destruction of the business for profit was the whole point!!!
we are not winning we are not moving in the correct direction and in the mean time people are dieing all over the world! fuck all the way off.
i don’t have any skin in this game, but you truley are not going to beat the “diying on this hill” allegations.
sure, but most games don’t respect over all darkness anyway. it’s looking day for night everywhere i go, and that’s being heavy handed on the darkness differs
the criticism comes from a place where he has consistently missed his potential, and he is over rated due to this, it goes into hack status when he gets high on his own supply. if i didn’t care deeply for his work i would not care enough to have such a strong opinion.
his self indulgence in these accolades should not be encouraged, and he should not be given infinite time, infinate money, and infinite control on a project unless you expect him to continue to succumb to his problems of meandering story, overspending, and spectacal at the cost of the narrative.
he is an artist, a visionary, and a hack, and sometimes art is defined by its constraints
and i have done these things, and i see no difference.
you push for individual culpability through othering and alienation to force collectivism, absurdity on nonsense.
just the notion alone that in order to achieve collectivism one must alone shoulder the burden of systematic change separately is oxymoronic and a waste of time.
do you just assume that people don’t do as you say because they are inherently evil? they actually seek their end?
all this nagging does’nt seem to be convincing me to agree with you after all