No the problem is that LLM keep being shoved into products and processes that are not stored for.
Why the fuck does a fridge need a text-prediction model, or notepad or even google when it isn't useful for fir most basic searches?
It has the economics of a bubble, is making or computing extremely expensive and in most cases degrades my experience. Obviously they are running into a wall.
LLMs used for purpose can be very useful! They will however not lead to AGI.
Much like my underwear doesn't need a Bluetooth connection, so do most of these products not need an LLM.
And we're not even talking about how there are people in jail for a fraction of the piracy these companies committed out that they used peoples private data to train these models. Based on how IP law is wielded against people we should get a payout for every single time an LLM is queried.
But the peril is highest in those first few levels as a strong breeze will kill a level 1 character.
I also think it is hard to get a feel for a character if they lack eveything that defines them class-wise imo
I'd never recommend playing dnd 5e at level 1, even for beginners. Level 3 is where classes get their basic identity and you don't instantly die to everything
That would disqualify a lot of the better quality sources and promote low quality clickbait.
I'd much prefer either a paywall bypass, such as archive, in the body or comments. Alternatively a copy of the full text / high quality summary needs to be provided.
The rules as provided would for instance disqualify reuters and several investigative journalist papers.
I also think posters who use a non standard source (ie not the well known reuters/ap/bbc/cnn/aljazeera etc) should mention in the text the reach and slant of the source.
No the problem is that LLM keep being shoved into products and processes that are not stored for.
Why the fuck does a fridge need a text-prediction model, or notepad or even google when it isn't useful for fir most basic searches?
It has the economics of a bubble, is making or computing extremely expensive and in most cases degrades my experience. Obviously they are running into a wall.
LLMs used for purpose can be very useful! They will however not lead to AGI.
Much like my underwear doesn't need a Bluetooth connection, so do most of these products not need an LLM.
And we're not even talking about how there are people in jail for a fraction of the piracy these companies committed out that they used peoples private data to train these models. Based on how IP law is wielded against people we should get a payout for every single time an LLM is queried.
European chinese food is def a creation of rhe people that immigrated here. There is no american connection in between. What the fuck are you smoking
Dat is een manier om dat te zeggen
Literal eu law that says they can't charge roaming?
No, you're a fascist troll. You're just calling anything fascist to dilute the meaning.
Multiple people have already explained basic stuff to you, which you willfully ignore in favour of your baseless propaganda.
Congratulations your actions are indistinguishable from those fascist you claim to hate (but don't, because you are a troll).
I'm in this picture and don't like this
But the peril is highest in those first few levels as a strong breeze will kill a level 1 character. I also think it is hard to get a feel for a character if they lack eveything that defines them class-wise imo
Translation; I want to be an enormous asshole on the interwebs, where can I do this without being banned?
Ah yes, secondary and tertiary effects of climate change claps
We don't need a plan where we're going!
Well, you DID say you had a character idea...
I'd never recommend playing dnd 5e at level 1, even for beginners. Level 3 is where classes get their basic identity and you don't instantly die to everything
But what if you did it thrice!
It's kind of pathetic they don't even pretend to care about their own rules anymore.
I just hope we can turn this place into a better alternative!
Ama related; What's the thing your players did that caused the biggest "Oh. NO. They did that?!" reaction you've had
That would disqualify a lot of the better quality sources and promote low quality clickbait.
I'd much prefer either a paywall bypass, such as archive, in the body or comments. Alternatively a copy of the full text / high quality summary needs to be provided. The rules as provided would for instance disqualify reuters and several investigative journalist papers.
I also think posters who use a non standard source (ie not the well known reuters/ap/bbc/cnn/aljazeera etc) should mention in the text the reach and slant of the source.
Pretty decent article ezplaining why
People with nothing to lose don't tend to stay quiet... They're also a lot more likely to join groups that violently and indiscriminately retaliate
He's only at Rutte IV so if he wants to reach Rutte X and still retire, he needs to hurry those election cycles
What exactly constitutes green hydrogen in this context?
Wtf