The sentence can be “How rightists look when you criticize billionaires” or “What rightists look like when you criticize billionaires”. Combining both makes a hideous mutant sentence that begs to be put out of its misery.
Ouch, I guess I’ve triggered you. Apologies. I believe your previous post is in violation of Rule 1, but hey I get it. Life’s busy and it’s easy to get caught up in and forget civility and respect. I’ll block you in a bit and you can continue on your way.
Some labour unions are bad/corrupt, therefore no trade unions should not exist.
You seem to acknowledge that some governments are bad/corrupt, but don’t apply the same logic to them. If the same logic was used it would be:
Some governments are bad/corrupt, therefore they should not exist.
However you instead apply the logic of:
Some governments are bad/corrupt, but they should still exist.
I just want some logical consistency.
I’m not arguing that there aren’t bad labour unions who don’t effectively represent their members. I’m arguing that the existence of bad/corrupt labour unions does not mean that labour unions should not exist at all.
Strangely, this post doesn’t really have anything to do with AI per-se. The exact same exploit is actively being exploited on YouTube and music streaming services without AI. AI is just a boogeyman feature of the exploit in this case and doesn’t really seemed to have played any real part in it.
I’ll renew my membership when the party’s executive is purged of the Liberal autocrats. And hey, maybe this time they can an executive that actually listens and works with its grassroots.
Avi as a leader is an excellent first step to reform.
Hate speech is not narrowly defined. It is barely defined. C-9 doesn't even need hate speech.
The proposed amendments in the Bill would create four new criminal offences: (1) an intimidation offence that prohibits conduct that is intended to provoke a state of fear in another person to impede them from accessing religious or cultural institutions and other specified places
Those of us old enough to remember the satanic panic will remember a lot of pearl clutching christians who can easily be provoked to a state of fear that would impede them from accessing religious or cultural institutions and other specified places.
Whether someone intended to provoke such pearl clutching is a matter of interpretation. And pearl clutters have a proven track record of getting interpretations in their favour - no matter how much evidence indicates otherwise.
A weird thing about anarchy is people have the freedom to not care about what you are saying.
The sentence can be “How rightists look when you criticize billionaires” or “What rightists look like when you criticize billionaires”. Combining both makes a hideous mutant sentence that begs to be put out of its misery.
Ouch, I guess I’ve triggered you. Apologies. I believe your previous post is in violation of Rule 1, but hey I get it. Life’s busy and it’s easy to get caught up in and forget civility and respect. I’ll block you in a bit and you can continue on your way.
This argument doesn’t make any logical sense.
Your argument appears to be:
Some labour unions are bad/corrupt, therefore no trade unions should not exist.
You seem to acknowledge that some governments are bad/corrupt, but don’t apply the same logic to them. If the same logic was used it would be:
Some governments are bad/corrupt, therefore they should not exist.
However you instead apply the logic of:
Some governments are bad/corrupt, but they should still exist.
I just want some logical consistency.
I’m not arguing that there aren’t bad labour unions who don’t effectively represent their members. I’m arguing that the existence of bad/corrupt labour unions does not mean that labour unions should not exist at all.
Apologies, I saw a post in a community on lemmy.ca and foolishly presumed that its default view wasn’t one of Americentrism. Silly me I guess.
What are talking about? Marijuana isn’t illegal federally.
https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/cannabis/
Well that’s just nonsense. I guess if we are going to just spout nonsense then I’ll need to start pulling my weight.
There is no human caused climate change.
Vaccines cause autism.
Governments and pharmaceutical companies are withholding the cure for cancer.
Israel isn’t a genocidal apartheid state.
Yeah because the government is so very trustworthy when it comes to the interests of those who aren’t rich and powerful.
I’m not sure what this has to do with Canada. Though if someone wants to do that here as a copycat, then I guess it would be related.
I’m a vegetarian, but I do make cultural exceptions.
Strangely, this post doesn’t really have anything to do with AI per-se. The exact same exploit is actively being exploited on YouTube and music streaming services without AI. AI is just a boogeyman feature of the exploit in this case and doesn’t really seemed to have played any real part in it.
Yeah, Democrats deserve your vote, as long as the republicans are slightly worse!
I’ll renew my membership when the party’s executive is purged of the Liberal autocrats. And hey, maybe this time they can an executive that actually listens and works with its grassroots.
Avi as a leader is an excellent first step to reform.
Hate speech is not narrowly defined. It is barely defined. C-9 doesn't even need hate speech.
Those of us old enough to remember the satanic panic will remember a lot of pearl clutching christians who can easily be provoked to a state of fear that would impede them from accessing religious or cultural institutions and other specified places.
Whether someone intended to provoke such pearl clutching is a matter of interpretation. And pearl clutters have a proven track record of getting interpretations in their favour - no matter how much evidence indicates otherwise.
Yep 100%
Become the conductor of the choir.
You could also call it logic.
Or empathy.
Or heck just contrarianism.
Lots of room on the anti-capitalism bus.
Sorry, this is a failure of compassion on my part. But it’s like a real life reenactment of Niemöller‘s “First they came”
They are detaining white people? NOW THEY’VE GONE TOO FAR!
This lady is a shill for Israel.