Well specifically it melts at a lower temperature because it's mixed with milk. The cheese part doesn't separate from the milk due to the additive, which is called an emulsifier. That also might sound artificial, but it's just the name for things that keep fats from separating from water and water-soluable foods. For example egg white is another emulsifier, and it's used in making mayonnaise.
Also 100% agree with American cheese being real cheese. It's not the best in every place you would want cheese, but that's true of any cheese. I don't want blue cheese on my nachos, and I don't want American cheese in my salads. But it's great on meat, and it's a good complement to a lot of warm foods.
prompted questions about who bears responsibility for an AI agent that goes rogue.
That's not a trivial question, but courts have had the concept of distributed weighted responsibility for decades. Does your company provide users with access to an AI agent you know aggressively finds illegal/unethical ways of completing prompts? Mostly the provider's fault with small fault of the user submitting the prompt. Safer AI with a user who has crafted the prompt specifically to attempt to get the AI to break into a system? Higher weight on the fault of the user, smaller weight on the provider.
We assume that the AI boom is the result of market demand. In reality, it is the result of investment decisions made by concentrated capital, which is reshaping the economy on its own terms.
But that's always been true under capitalism. It's just that in the past generally large capital expenditures have gone towards things the wealthy think will get them more wealth. There have always been capitalists who spend their money directing the economy to do what they want, rather than what the "market" wants. They just haven't had the majority of the capital being spent.
The last 50 years has seen an unprecedented concentration of wealth. The wealthy are literally a thousand times proportionately wealthier than poor people than they've been at any other point in human history. There's not much wealth to squeeze out of everyone else, so the economy is even more at the vain whims of those with all the capital as they look for things to spend it on.
Tech news has been reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on. Well, they've found something they want to spend it on, so they're emptying 20 years of profits in 5. They've now completely blown through those stores, and don't want to slow down, so now they're taking on unprecedented levels of debt. Something is going to give out and things are going to get bad within the next 5 years.
The countries highlighted here have collectively cut gasoline imports by roughly a third so far in 2026 compared to the same months last year, while simultaneously boosting imports of Chinese EVs to record highs.
Doesn't that correspond to the global crunch on oil caused by the war in Iran? Which simultaneously dramatically increased gasoline prices while also accelerating many countries' transition to cleaner energy sources? It's not clear their analysis accounts for this common factor.
Flock Safety cameras are automated license plate readers that capture images of plates along with a vehicle’s make, model and color. Police use the technology to investigate crimes such as hit-and-runs and to locate missing persons. Camera data is owned by the police department and permanently deleted after 30 days.
That's straight up misinformation, right? They capture way more than just license plates and vehicle details, police do way more than "investigate crimes" with them, and the data is absolutely not owned by the police department and deleted after 30 days.
Given the news of multiple kids killing themselves because of ChatGPT, my first interpretation of this headline was that that was Altman's response to the families of those kids. It doesn't sound out of character for him. I'm glad my first intuition was wrong and reality was just stupidity, but I have to think it's just a matter of time...
This seems like a strange site. Why does it not use capital letters? My eyesight is not the best, so it makes it harder to see the end/start of a sentence. And no names are capitalized either?
And every time it uses the phrase "minnesota water cyberattack trump iran" it just links to its own homepage, which isn't a news organization of any kind, but a marketing consulting agency? What is going on? This absolutely does not seem like a reliable source.
It's worth stating that this is showing just the private company contributions (private as in not owned by national governments). State-owned oil companies of various nations contribute massively as well, so beyond the bribes lobbying problem there's a direct conflict of interest for many nations that get a substantial amount of revenue from those state-owned oil companies.
You're right. The FCC approved their requested use of radio spectrum for communication with the satellite. They were very clear they were giving approval for this one mission, and for the communication spectrum, not the visible spectrum.
He's doing this because letting the judges choose the attorney like they are legally allowed to do deprives Trump of an appointment he can sell for money or favors. He's going to get away with this because of the recent Supreme Court ruling that says he can fire anyone in the Executive Branch (except for the Fed because reasons).
It's a web app and you just showed we can do it in text with Unicode and a modern browser. This bug is a level of self-inflicted, shouldn't-be-in-the-realm-of-possible problem I struggle to comprehend. It's the software version of not even wrong.
I want to say upfront that I don't subscribe to this argument myself, but the belief isn't that people don't want social programs. The argument is that society can't afford them. Supposedly, if people's basic needs are met by government programs that don't require any work from them, then enough people will stop working that tax revenue will fall below required levels for those programs and the whole system will collapse. Therefore people blocking or otherwise countering these programs are actually saving people from themselves.
I don't think it's a good argument, but let's not build a straw man.
“Today, our long-range sanctions reached the oil refinery in Omsk – nearly 2,500 kilometres from Ukraine,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said
I wonder how many of these are from fans that simply left the service. I actually really liked the live action Avatar first season, but since watching it I've canceled Netflix because of the ads and price increases. If their service hadn't enshittefied so much so fast I would have watched the second season.
Following his speech, the president is planning on setting off fireworks for 40 minutes in an attempt to break the world record for fireworks. Firework manufacturers have said this will cost many millions of dollars, but the White House is yet to disclose exactly how much they are spending and how they obtained the funds.
Those USAID funds, and funding for dozens of other programs, aren't going where they're legally supposed to anymore, so probably from there.
After attending the Supreme Court hearing earlier this year, Trump falsely claimed in a Truth Social post that the U.S. is “the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow ‘Birthright’ Citizenship!”
This is such a stupid and easily disproved take. I've had relatives claim to me that the US is the only country with birthright citizenship. It's very common in the Americas.
And even if it wasn't, and the US was the only country with birthright citizenship, isn't that our choice as a nation? Do we have to do what other countries do? If we're going to do that, can we start with universal healthcare and then revisit birthright citizenship after, say, better protections for unions, guaranteed parental leave, guaranteed vacation time, unlimited sick time, higher taxes on the wealthy, abolition of at-will employment, and about 100 other policies the US is the only wealthy nation either not to have or to have a legal framework against?
For the record, the US intelligence apparatus and military both strongly advised against military action in Iran in this case. Trump is just a vain moron that can be talked into anything by anyone at any time.
Well specifically it melts at a lower temperature because it's mixed with milk. The cheese part doesn't separate from the milk due to the additive, which is called an emulsifier. That also might sound artificial, but it's just the name for things that keep fats from separating from water and water-soluable foods. For example egg white is another emulsifier, and it's used in making mayonnaise.
Also 100% agree with American cheese being real cheese. It's not the best in every place you would want cheese, but that's true of any cheese. I don't want blue cheese on my nachos, and I don't want American cheese in my salads. But it's great on meat, and it's a good complement to a lot of warm foods.
That's not a trivial question, but courts have had the concept of distributed weighted responsibility for decades. Does your company provide users with access to an AI agent you know aggressively finds illegal/unethical ways of completing prompts? Mostly the provider's fault with small fault of the user submitting the prompt. Safer AI with a user who has crafted the prompt specifically to attempt to get the AI to break into a system? Higher weight on the fault of the user, smaller weight on the provider.
But that's always been true under capitalism. It's just that in the past generally large capital expenditures have gone towards things the wealthy think will get them more wealth. There have always been capitalists who spend their money directing the economy to do what they want, rather than what the "market" wants. They just haven't had the majority of the capital being spent.
The last 50 years has seen an unprecedented concentration of wealth. The wealthy are literally a thousand times proportionately wealthier than poor people than they've been at any other point in human history. There's not much wealth to squeeze out of everyone else, so the economy is even more at the vain whims of those with all the capital as they look for things to spend it on.
Tech news has been reporting for literal decades that Apple, Amazon, Google, and similar have been sitting on giant war chests of profit with nothing to spend it on. Well, they've found something they want to spend it on, so they're emptying 20 years of profits in 5. They've now completely blown through those stores, and don't want to slow down, so now they're taking on unprecedented levels of debt. Something is going to give out and things are going to get bad within the next 5 years.
Doesn't that correspond to the global crunch on oil caused by the war in Iran? Which simultaneously dramatically increased gasoline prices while also accelerating many countries' transition to cleaner energy sources? It's not clear their analysis accounts for this common factor.
That's straight up misinformation, right? They capture way more than just license plates and vehicle details, police do way more than "investigate crimes" with them, and the data is absolutely not owned by the police department and deleted after 30 days.
Given the news of multiple kids killing themselves because of ChatGPT, my first interpretation of this headline was that that was Altman's response to the families of those kids. It doesn't sound out of character for him. I'm glad my first intuition was wrong and reality was just stupidity, but I have to think it's just a matter of time...
This seems like a strange site. Why does it not use capital letters? My eyesight is not the best, so it makes it harder to see the end/start of a sentence. And no names are capitalized either?
And every time it uses the phrase "minnesota water cyberattack trump iran" it just links to its own homepage, which isn't a news organization of any kind, but a marketing consulting agency? What is going on? This absolutely does not seem like a reliable source.
It's worth stating that this is showing just the private company contributions (private as in not owned by national governments). State-owned oil companies of various nations contribute massively as well, so beyond the
bribeslobbying problem there's a direct conflict of interest for many nations that get a substantial amount of revenue from those state-owned oil companies.You're right. The FCC approved their requested use of radio spectrum for communication with the satellite. They were very clear they were giving approval for this one mission, and for the communication spectrum, not the visible spectrum.
He's doing this because letting the judges choose the attorney like they are legally allowed to do deprives Trump of an appointment he can sell for money or favors. He's going to get away with this because of the recent Supreme Court ruling that says he can fire anyone in the Executive Branch (except for the Fed because reasons).
It's a web app and you just showed we can do it in text with Unicode and a modern browser. This bug is a level of self-inflicted, shouldn't-be-in-the-realm-of-possible problem I struggle to comprehend. It's the software version of not even wrong.
I want to say upfront that I don't subscribe to this argument myself, but the belief isn't that people don't want social programs. The argument is that society can't afford them. Supposedly, if people's basic needs are met by government programs that don't require any work from them, then enough people will stop working that tax revenue will fall below required levels for those programs and the whole system will collapse. Therefore people blocking or otherwise countering these programs are actually saving people from themselves.
I don't think it's a good argument, but let's not build a straw man.
I think it's technically not crop rotation because they're supposed to be planted in the same field at the same time, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Sisters_(agriculture)
Straight white cis people never do anything untoward.
That sounds flat out illegal.
The man knows his messaging.
I wonder how many of these are from fans that simply left the service. I actually really liked the live action Avatar first season, but since watching it I've canceled Netflix because of the ads and price increases. If their service hadn't enshittefied so much so fast I would have watched the second season.
Those USAID funds, and funding for dozens of other programs, aren't going where they're legally supposed to anymore, so probably from there.
This is such a stupid and easily disproved take. I've had relatives claim to me that the US is the only country with birthright citizenship. It's very common in the Americas.
And even if it wasn't, and the US was the only country with birthright citizenship, isn't that our choice as a nation? Do we have to do what other countries do? If we're going to do that, can we start with universal healthcare and then revisit birthright citizenship after, say, better protections for unions, guaranteed parental leave, guaranteed vacation time, unlimited sick time, higher taxes on the wealthy, abolition of at-will employment, and about 100 other policies the US is the only wealthy nation either not to have or to have a legal framework against?
For the record, the US intelligence apparatus and military both strongly advised against military action in Iran in this case. Trump is just a vain moron that can be talked into anything by anyone at any time.