I'm assuming you've never tried to become a millionaire before and it only takes me 2 seconds of googling to find what you're missing
The readme doesn't mention making you a millionaire though
And I won't showcase it making you a millionaire
But if you reply saying you would need to see proof of it working before you spend too much time digging into this, I'll say "have you actually used it? You shouldn't be making assumptions"
Since this is a Nazi society, I bet me mirroring your bullshit will be treated very differently by the crowd, from how they react to you bullshitting me to begin with
I said I would need to see proof of it working, why the fuck would I let everyone that hates me make me spend hours doing a 10x more than needed investigation of every fucking irrelevant link they can come up with
Showcase it working in real world conditions (you can't because it definitely doesn't) or shut the fuck up moron
I was waiting for someone to just lie and pretend the github link is more than a proof of concept. Didn't read past that part but feel free to show the thing working in the real world if you want, retard.
The readme page doesn't even slightly imply it's designed to work in real world conditions, because it's only a proof of concept. Real world use cases are literally not even mentioned by the dev. But knock yourself out trying to showcase functionality that doesn't exist
Inb4 you reply with either no showcase at all, or a showcase of what is definitely not real world conditions and only a proof of concept (while you continue lying about it)
Have passed this info onto the dev but it didn't seem useful to them.
Also, based on your other comments in this thread like the ones where you pretended onion services should never be used due to traffic - blocking you now, no longer interested in seeing if you have anything useful to contribute. If you need to say anything else, feel free to reach out to the dev directly or reach out to me on nostr, where there are no blocks and I'm more patient.
conflating my replies for abrasive people with me being abrasive
also:
conflating my replies for abrasive people with my reply for someone that posted an off-topic link under possibly good intentions
When I tell you you come across as an insufferable asshole, I'm not lying like you are when you say it to me
Btw, I notice how you're incredibly obvious about your connection to the other user that just made a similar comment - that's on purpose, surely, meant to be noticed right? Another layer of the gaslighting, being incredibly obvious about fucked up harassment behaviors but knowing you can deny them while Nazi herd mentality will also deny the obviousness
conflating my replies for hostile disingenuous time wasting dumbasses like you with my reply for someone who posted an irrelevant link under possibly good intentions
Do you get paid for this or are you just getting practice by trying to gaslight me?
A. The screenshot didn't load for you and you're getting way ahead of yourself making shit up presenting it as reality without loading the actual image
B. (obvious real one) The screenshot did load for you but you're trying to gaslight me by pretending you thought it was really "prickly" or had some extreme "tone" - conflating my replies for hostile disingenuous time wasting dumbasses like you with my reply for someone who posted an irrelevant link under possibly good intentions
Look at the fucking number of bullet points of rebuttals for me to make here already, what you're doing is called a "gish gallop" and anyone reading this should look that up
There's never need to downvote anyone, downvotes aren't driven by need, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
Whether downvotes are needed is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
I'm not wrong
Whether I'm wrong is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
I didn't ask if I was having a moderation issue
Whether I'm aware of the moderation issue I told you about is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
I don't care if some off topic thing I didn't ask about is off topic, it doesn't make my post off topic at all unless something is wrong with your client that makes it fail to render the rest of my post (in which case even the part you're seeing is still half on-topic since it's about the place I'm posting it in)
I didn't ask if you care about me or think you did, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
Whether you care about me is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
I didn't ask if you know me or think you did, you know that and you're wasting time pretending otherwise
Whether you know me is a programming topic to you, but me asking about responses to my coding project isn't?
It's on topic (literally about the place I'm posting it in, and about programming) but you want it removed. What would happen if both of you said that instead of lying? Would it be unbearable for you to handle your feelings that way instead?
It's weird how after complaining you couldn't understand such a short post, you gaslight me about how "good" my reasons have to be for noticing obvious things.
Regarding the tools - currently using zint, ffmpeg, and zxing as I continue trying to do this. Was zbar instead of zxing at time of the original post.
Idea definitely should be easy for someone with more knowledge/expertise than me, and if anyone got the idea from my removed post, they can get it done faster than me and pretend it had nothing to do with me, thanks to my post being removed. But that's totally aside from the point of whether people think it seems like bots or just regular human stupidity driving vote patterns like these.
If so, is it run by gangstalkers like the one on reddit?
Kinda strange topic to try to make online discussion hubs for, except on nostr
This github repo will make you a millionaire
The readme does not mention real world use cases
I said I would need to see proof of it working, why the fuck would I let everyone that hates me make me spend hours doing a 10x more than needed investigation of every fucking irrelevant link they can come up with
Showcase it working in real world conditions (you can't because it definitely doesn't) or shut the fuck up moron
I was waiting for someone to just lie and pretend the github link is more than a proof of concept. Didn't read past that part but feel free to show the thing working in the real world if you want, retard.
The readme page doesn't even slightly imply it's designed to work in real world conditions, because it's only a proof of concept. Real world use cases are literally not even mentioned by the dev. But knock yourself out trying to showcase functionality that doesn't exist
Inb4 you reply with either no showcase at all, or a showcase of what is definitely not real world conditions and only a proof of concept (while you continue lying about it)
Blocked for gaslighting
Have passed this info onto the dev but it didn't seem useful to them.
Also, based on your other comments in this thread like the ones where you pretended onion services should never be used due to traffic - blocking you now, no longer interested in seeing if you have anything useful to contribute. If you need to say anything else, feel free to reach out to the dev directly or reach out to me on nostr, where there are no blocks and I'm more patient.
also:
When I tell you you come across as an insufferable asshole, I'm not lying like you are when you say it to me
Btw, I notice how you're incredibly obvious about your connection to the other user that just made a similar comment - that's on purpose, surely, meant to be noticed right? Another layer of the gaslighting, being incredibly obvious about fucked up harassment behaviors but knowing you can deny them while Nazi herd mentality will also deny the obviousness
also:
When I tell you you come across as a dick, I'm not lying like you are when you say it to me
Do you get paid for this or are you just getting practice by trying to gaslight me?
Didn't read past first few words either way
One (of three) is a Palestinian flag, they said "overuse" as a Nazi dog whistle for not liking that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_whistle_(politics)
What about you, I assume you're a Nazi too based on your initial reply?
Possibilities:
A. The screenshot didn't load for you and you're getting way ahead of yourself making shit up presenting it as reality without loading the actual image
B. (obvious real one) The screenshot did load for you but you're trying to gaslight me by pretending you thought it was really "prickly" or had some extreme "tone" - conflating my replies for hostile disingenuous time wasting dumbasses like you with my reply for someone who posted an irrelevant link under possibly good intentions
It's on topic (literally about the place I'm posting it in, and about programming) but you want it removed. What would happen if both of you said that instead of lying? Would it be unbearable for you to handle your feelings that way instead?
Read more carefully, I explained the context.
It's weird how after complaining you couldn't understand such a short post, you gaslight me about how "good" my reasons have to be for noticing obvious things.
Regarding the tools - currently using zint, ffmpeg, and zxing as I continue trying to do this. Was zbar instead of zxing at time of the original post.
Idea definitely should be easy for someone with more knowledge/expertise than me, and if anyone got the idea from my removed post, they can get it done faster than me and pretend it had nothing to do with me, thanks to my post being removed. But that's totally aside from the point of whether people think it seems like bots or just regular human stupidity driving vote patterns like these.
Nostr is the only thing worth a shit
No it's not, stop whining child
If we're talking names, I've always liked Apache for its name
I'm too based to have a github account
Would be cool, but my thinking has been it's just not feasible yet with current hardware