kboos1

u/kboos1@lemmy.world
3 posts · 616 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

On your second question, it's a little bit of propaganda and a little bit idealism. America was still on a high from the victory over the Axis, Russia was the new big bad, and TV was still very new. So Hollywood and the government wanted to capitalize on that by portraying what the idealic American should be and instill trust in the government. Which eventually came to a screeching halt in the 60s.

on PSP 1001 or PSP Go? · c/retrogaming · 9 pts · 2d

I would do the 1000, has less ram and storage but unless you have small hands it is much easier to hold. The PSP is small to begin with, the Go made it worse by putting the buttons less than an inch apart.

3000 was the best in my opinion.

I wonder.

Does this mean that one of the Trump kids will run?

Does he think he can legally run again?

Is he trying to start WW3 so he can stay pres?

Is he admitting that he's going to change the law so that he can run again?

Is this all a joke that's not funny at all?

Why did he try to make himself skinnier? We all know he's a bowling ball with toothpick arms and legs.

$19. I've seen enough evil genie movies. It will never be tomorrow, it's always today. Tomorrow is the promise of today.

It won't.

Driving costs down doesn't drive prices down. You may see prices stabilize and see more sales, but as you see today the digital and physical prices are the same for the first few months/years. With digital you are at the mercy of Sony, with physical you're at the mercy of the retailer.

The only time Sony offered anything to the user as a charity was free online play and PS+ was $40 a year, but that's because they were losing the console war with poor PS3 sales. There's no incentive for Sony to do anything for the consumer.

I mean, do we really need to answer the question? No. But hear me out....I think we need to watch her do whatever the hell she's doing just to be sure.

on Low rating · c/lemmyshitpost · 19 pts · 6d

Letting people off the hook in exchange for foot stuff an entirely different problem. I think the focus misplaced.

Except, AI and AI companies will try to convince you that it is right and legal. So I argue that there is also the fault of AI and AI companies as it in intended to be used that way.

The assumption is that the user is supposed to know better but if the user is gullible then wouldn't some of the fault be with AI and company for taking advantage?

If you don't leash your dog and it attacks your neighbors then are you and the dog not at fault?