lonerangers1

u/lonerangers1@lemmy.world
4 posts · 99 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

Following three strikes on data centres, Iran has signalled that technology infrastructure will continue to be in the firing line.

Boasting political stability and access to cheap energy, the UAE was supposed to be ground zero for the next wave of AI development.

In the space of four days in May 2025, US President Donald Trump toured Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, and announced more than $2.8 trillion in investment pledges.

The centrepiece was a $700 billion AI data centre in Abu Dhabi, to be built in partnership with Open AI, NVIDIA, Oracle and Cisco. OpenAI claimed the facility could eventually serve half the world’s population.

In October 2025, Australia’s AirTrunk also announced a separate $4.2 billion deal to build a data centre in nearby Saudi Arabia.

The future of AI in the Gulf seemed bright. But that all changed in the space of three drone strikes.

This region is no longer a secure place to build this kind of infrastructure, says Jessie Moritz, senior lecturer in political economy at the ANU. “No country wants to put its data centres in an unstable environment.”

The strikes were part of Iran’s strategy of “asymmetrical warfare,” says Dr Moritz.

Iran has launched attacks on civilian infrastructure across the Gulf states — from hotels to oil refineries to water desalination plants — in an attempt to make the conflict costly for its adversaries.

Already, the price of oil is rising. Key shipping routes have been brought to a standstill. Air travel is in disarray.

Now, data centres have become strategic targets, too. Big tech added to Iran’s list of targets

The US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, has been sounding a bit like a tech executive lately.

The US military will become “AI-first”, he said. It will “unleash experimentation” and “eliminate bureaucratic barriers”.

The US and Israeli militaries are also using AI to identify targets.

Big tech firms — including Amazon — have long worked with the US military, which has turned them into targets in the conflict with Iran.

Military use was cited by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard in justifying one of last week’s strikes on the Amazon data centres. On Thursday, that dynamic only deepened.

According to Al Jazeera, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard published a list of “new targets”, including data centres and offices for several US-based tech companies.

A spokesperson for a state-affiliated media agency said that, since the US had struck a bank branch in Tehran, these technology assets were now the legitimate targets of retaliatory strikes. War raises costs, risks for data centres

The task of running a reliable data centre is expensive, even under normal circumstances. They consume significant amounts of water and electricity, require highly trained workers to be on-shift around the clock, and need to be secured against cyber attacks.

The costs will only rise when caught up in a conflict zone.

“Protecting it against missiles, drones, blast effects, shrapnel, fire, water damage, and cascading utility failures is another order of difficulty,” says Kristian Alexander, lead researcher at the Rabdan Security & Defence Institute in Abu Dhabi.

These strikes may “drive up insurance premiums, [and] may make it harder to attract engineering talent”, as Sam Winter-Levy, a fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, told Bloomberg TV.

Data centres are also notoriously difficult to hide. They are massive structures that emit a large heat signature and have a distinctive look in satellite imagery.

The costs of fortifying the largest data centres against these new threats could run into the “low hundreds of millions of dollars” per facility, estimates Dr Alexander.

It is wise to spread the risk around, and these systems are already built with redundancy in mind. Amazon has three data centres in each of the UAE and Bahrain, which should be able to gracefully handle the loss of a single facility in both.

But that still wasn’t enough to keep services running.

The two centres hit in the UAE went down at the same time and caused severe outages. There were disruptions to all sorts of services in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, including banking, taxi and food delivery apps.

This kind of coordinated attack reveals the vulnerability of these systems, even when considerable redundancy is built in — which only raises the risks and costs higher.

“If data centres become increasingly targeted in war,” says Zachary Kallenborn, a PhD researcher at King’s College London, “it is reasonable to expect tech companies to weigh that risk in deciding where they build future centres”.

And the threats to digital infrastructure in the Middle East don’t start and end with data centres either. There’s another piece of digital infrastructure, just as critical, that could also be put at risk.

Whether the targets are data centres or undersea cables or another kind of digital infrastructure, disruptions in the Middle East can ripple outwards.

Last year, Dr Kallenborn spoke with senior officials in the US about these risks.

He concluded that “infrastructure protection policy is very nationally focused”, and doesn’t often extend to foreign infrastructure, even when it is critical to that country’s interests.

Since publishing his research, though, he has been heartened to see officials recognising that “a real, unaddressed problem exists”.

“The open question is what comes next,” he says, “what specific policies, programs, and regulations can best reduce the risks?

“Honestly, I do not know.”

In silicon valley there is an episode where a bunch of phones explode because of a software problem. A lot like the pager attack trump got a trophy for. And musk could take any of these cars and "self drive" them to where ever, and "update" their discharge parameters or something, then boom. The trucks are 10k lbs too. Bet you could take a small building down with one without much fuss. They are pretty fast. Scary shit. Musk is a huge problem. Watch all gov envoys being his swasticars and then he can take people out russian style. opps, accident, again.

on fun series · c/mk4_volkswagen · 2 pts · 1y

Nice, I bet the junk yard has a bunch of fender extension options, and maybe even a car to test fit them on. I love the junk yard for the no risk try. I agree, if I went any bigger on the tires I would have some rub issues. Any higher and it starts looking obvious. I don't know if I would be adding more function either. I think doing a body lift from where I am at would be best. spacers between unibody and subframe, matching spacers at the trans and engine mounts to lower the engine and trans,same at top of struts, and plates in the back. This way the suspension can still function more correctly. Not end up with camber problems. Would help keep weight lower also. Maybe some camber plates on top of the struts and adjustment at the control arms would compensate though. More than one way to get it done.

wagon trailer is perfect.

I will post up some stuff on my jetta. I have a homemade rack on it that I use for ladders and couches and shit. The way VW did the factory rack mounts you can remove those points. I used them to bolt mine to the car. I have 2 versions. I have plans for a v3. I want to make it easier to move plywood sheets.

I spent years working out of my jetta. I loved the contrast with the truckbros. I worked a few high rise condo gigs and all the truck bros had to pull up and unload, have someone stay with all the gear on the sidewalk while driver goes off to find a spot, I was the only one with a vehicle that could fit in the buildings parking garage. It was privately gated so I knew no one was going to steal anything, and 30ft from the elevator. Ladders on the roof no problem. Oh, shit also fits in a garage no problem with shit on the roof. Best was that it cost me like 45 cents a mile to drive and the irs kicked back like 60 cents a mile, so I came out ahead every mile.

Can't you ban the entire domain from the network at the router level? I think it would be very fitting to block them on your network in retaliation to them blocking you on theirs.

on My golf · c/mk4_volkswagen · 2 pts · 1y

TDI TT would be sweet. I love when one gets put together in a way VAG overlooked. Like vr6 beetles.

on fun series · c/mk4_volkswagen · 2 pts · 1y

Funny how VWs multiply. So many of us have a few around and a history of more. Like the guy in the video. 1 car, now its 2, then there are 3 cars,.....

My lift is vr6 springs with a spacer between spring top hat and bearing on the front struts, and in the back I found the heaviest stock springs at the junk yard and threw some urethane spacers under them. Then some 205/70r15 geolander A/Ts. It works out to 2-3 inches of lift. I get a smidge of rub on the back where the liner bumps out for the charcoal canister and LDP. I think past this I would be looking to do lift plates on the back hubs, which would also add some width. And up front I don't know. mk5 strut mounts with spacers, sub frame and engine mount spacers, tubular control arms with some extra reach. Maybe a modded subframe and rear swing arm.

For the trailer you might look at throwing some airbags in the back instead of springs, or some tow bags inside them. I have seen some heavy duty hitch installs also. Mounted off the rear bumper mounts instead of sheet metal like a curt.

Please make a matching trailer. That set up is so sweet. I always thought 2 golf asses together would be cool.