In my current understanding instance admins have the power to delete posts in third party communities for the users on the instance they administer. This would not affect other instances, since they are other servers, where a third party instance admin has no power. At least that's how I remember the global moderation tools being when I used to run my own instance.
So in my current understanding it would not matter, if this post is in a 3rd party community, or directly on this instance. If the admins were to disapprove of this post as much as implied, they would've removed this post from feddit.org directly. The "only" difference being that if this post was on feddit.org and they were to delete it, it would probably also be removed from all the other instances, but this point does not matter, since that is not the case.
My whole argument here is, that my instance administrators would've deleted this post on my end already and I wouldn't see and interact with this post right now. This point requires that my understanding of the moderation tools are correct, which I currently can't verify easily.
Feel free to correct me, if my understanding of Lemmys moderation tools are incorrect.
So while in theory Thunder could add support for these Links, I really just whished that Voyager would stop advertising themselves whenever somebody shares a link with their client.
The actions of Voyager seem malicious; no other Lemmy (or mastodon client) that I know of does not directly link to the post in question and rather just advertises itself like an adfly page.
I get redircted outside of my Lemmy App (because it is a 3rd party URL) and then get advertised a Lemmy client, which I don't even like, only for its page to only show a preview and in order to actually view the linked post I have to open the original WebUI of the Lemmy instance linked on the advertising page of voyager?
And it got the balls to tell me that its the best experience?
This is what finally pushed me to move all coding I can away from Jetbrains products. I wanted to to that for a while, because I didn't want to depend on a closed system and wait until it enshitified. Now it happened. Sad to see, but it was inevitable.
I'm gonna throw the rythm game Osu! into the ring. The lazer client works natively on linux and is available in the AUR. (The -bin version is required for score submission).
In my current understanding instance admins have the power to delete posts in third party communities for the users on the instance they administer. This would not affect other instances, since they are other servers, where a third party instance admin has no power. At least that's how I remember the global moderation tools being when I used to run my own instance.
So in my current understanding it would not matter, if this post is in a 3rd party community, or directly on this instance. If the admins were to disapprove of this post as much as implied, they would've removed this post from feddit.org directly. The "only" difference being that if this post was on feddit.org and they were to delete it, it would probably also be removed from all the other instances, but this point does not matter, since that is not the case.
My whole argument here is, that my instance administrators would've deleted this post on my end already and I wouldn't see and interact with this post right now. This point requires that my understanding of the moderation tools are correct, which I currently can't verify easily.
Feel free to correct me, if my understanding of Lemmys moderation tools are incorrect.
Here's a link.
Nothing happened. Its still up, hasn't been taken down, did not get downvoted to hell.
I honestly don't know what they were expecting.
It's still up. With only 4 downvotes. 21h after posting. What's your point?
Ah wait. You can't read this anyway, since your admin defederated the instance. Shucks.
Only tangetally related, but I'm still gonna drop it here:
https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/index2.html
That makes way more sense. I would question it, since my client (Thunder) manages the same without requiring to rewrite the URL.
Voyager made this website and probably added these URLs as supported links.
I am not on voyager, but on thunder and it does not work, since there links are not the standard share link. I tested using normal links in a comment and it works there.
So while in theory Thunder could add support for these Links, I really just whished that Voyager would stop advertising themselves whenever somebody shares a link with their client.
The actions of Voyager seem malicious; no other Lemmy (or mastodon client) that I know of does not directly link to the post in question and rather just advertises itself like an adfly page.
Test comment with link to other Lemmy post
Sorry to be like this, but what is this link?
I get redircted outside of my Lemmy App (because it is a 3rd party URL) and then get advertised a Lemmy client, which I don't even like, only for its page to only show a preview and in order to actually view the linked post I have to open the original WebUI of the Lemmy instance linked on the advertising page of voyager?
And it got the balls to tell me that its the best experience?
What the fuck Voyager??
Habe auch an Patreon gedacht, will aber nicht unbedingt 10% an die Platform donaten. Da finde ich ko-fi's approach deutlich besser.
Wäre gut, wenn man auch mit PayPal zahlen könnte. :|
Meine Bank supported leider noch kein Wero und ich kann mit einer Debit Card nicht online zahlen bei ko-fi. :(
Is the warranty still only 30 days?
Damn. That's a lot of telemetry data.
Its always fun to see what she does next.
Thanks for taking the time!
This is what finally pushed me to move all coding I can away from Jetbrains products. I wanted to to that for a while, because I didn't want to depend on a closed system and wait until it enshitified. Now it happened. Sad to see, but it was inevitable.
I'm gonna throw the rythm game Osu! into the ring. The lazer client works natively on linux and is available in the AUR. (The -bin version is required for score submission).
Project repo on GitHub
No. Sadly they lack the security requirements for GOS. Source
Lets see how much better it will run when Linux comes into the picture.
Just out of curiosity, do you have a source for your claims that Nintendo has a bad work environment?
I'd love to learn more about it and verify this claim.