No one was debating whether malware should be installed. If companies don't want their data nuked, they shouldn't give nuking powers to AIs that execute anything they read.
Most people you'd meet in real life were still jerks, but there was less existential dread. It was more "you win some, you lose some" and less "humanity is doomed and the human condition is irredeemable."
Products were designed to last.
Most of the people you'd chat with on the internet were curious, benevolent nerds, not narcissistic political hacks.
OP post wife asked about "kids, families, jobs." There are plenty of families where there would be no news about those subjects. But furthermore, there are plenty of topics that were probably mentioned but then forgotten because they were mundane.
You just admitted the "girl" was an AI video persona, which is possible to identify with a trained eye. Thus, there was video evidence that the "girl" was being deceptive and all traits they claimed about themselves were suspect. To quote Ready Player One, "she could be a 300-pound dude named Chuck."
The defendant could claim actual 14 year olds would be unable to orchestrate such a setup with AI personas. Thus, it must have been an older person doing it.
You understand that that is a pedantic point and practically useless and irrelevant, yes?
Fixed, thanks.
The r-word in the top commenter's first sentence is a slur against the developmentally disabled.
Or the band? Or the flora?
Professors do train, too
Is that guy a Pokemon trainer or what
Starting a war only kills certain demographics, namely young poor people, as well as anyone who lives in a place that gets bombed.
Police handle other demographics.
In the Gog character text box, the symbol on the far right is the symbol for the SS
No one was debating whether malware should be installed. If companies don't want their data nuked, they shouldn't give nuking powers to AIs that execute anything they read.
Most people you'd meet in real life were still jerks, but there was less existential dread. It was more "you win some, you lose some" and less "humanity is doomed and the human condition is irredeemable."
Products were designed to last.
Most of the people you'd chat with on the internet were curious, benevolent nerds, not narcissistic political hacks.
Someone calling their own take hot is how you know they're an irrelevant chode
If the AI bootlicking wasn't clear enough
Note to self: make shoes to sell to rich people
I read your comment in Dale's voice
OP post wife asked about "kids, families, jobs." There are plenty of families where there would be no news about those subjects. But furthermore, there are plenty of topics that were probably mentioned but then forgotten because they were mundane.
Looks over at my wife ok bro
... for not boring each other with mundane anecdotes? Lol
I'm sure your friends totally love when you talk about yourself, though
Don't credit unions have desktop sites? Can't you use an e-mail for authentication?
Maybe they think shaming will be effective
Therapy doesn't fix reality.
You just admitted the "girl" was an AI video persona, which is possible to identify with a trained eye. Thus, there was video evidence that the "girl" was being deceptive and all traits they claimed about themselves were suspect. To quote Ready Player One, "she could be a 300-pound dude named Chuck."
The defendant could claim actual 14 year olds would be unable to orchestrate such a setup with AI personas. Thus, it must have been an older person doing it.