Yep, agree! That first paragraph is where I'm at now, trying to work with social scientists, business people, economists, who ever is keen. That interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary work is suuuuper interesting and fun and fucking hard.
I don't think that last bit is right, see my other comment to FireRetardant's reply. I think the increase in warming rate is basically instantaneous (maybe a few months for atmospheric mixing), it's the peak of temperature/heat that is delayed (agreeing with your 3rd paragraph)
Yeah.. realising I was not making a distinction between greenhouse effect (e.g. increased rate of warming), and the result (e.g. actual increased heat content/temperature. I think the rate of warming increase is basically instant, but yes, it takes some time for the temperature levels to catch up.
I don't know if I was explicitly taught it at uni, buy I have always understood as a climate scientist that GHG emissions started before the industrial revolution (albeit small). I think that's common knowledge in climate science.
Sure. Right now, everyone has to make a trade-off between accepting a smaller network and engaging with corporate garbage designed to create rage and clicks. Personally I'm happy to sit on the smaller network and contribute a bit and wait for it to build naturally. That's why I'm here on Lemmy too.
Yes, we used to play that way. Basically any attack card could be stacked on top of a previous one (of a matching colour or type), and the first person who couldn't add to the stack got all the effects combined (so you might pick up 6 cards from a stack of +2s)
My intuitive answer is that the collapse of globalised industrial society seems fairly likely (as a result of the end of cheap liquid fuel if nothing else). What that looks like is highly dependent on how we respond - it's not a climate problem, it's a social problem.
I don't think humans are going to go extinct, but a population crash seems likely. And we're taking out a tonne of other species.
I only use it sporadically, but when I do, I often write replies and get replies. I think you need to mutually follow a lot of people before it starts working (like, a thousand or more). I'm not convinced the reply rate is significantly lower than BS or twitter..
Re: your last comment: for sure. To me that's another bonus of fediverse, e.g. since mastodon is at least partially able to interact with Lemmy and other fediverse apps, and that will presumably improve over time, eventually you will be able to do at lot of cross-app interaction from one place.
If you want microblogging social media just use mastodon (or one of it's forks). Even if Bluesky is decent now, it's owned by venture capital, so it's only a matter of time before it enshittifies.
I bought a second hand Intel NUC and put a big harddrive in it (I think only.some models have a slot). Works pretty good.
Um.. Where does the guy in the middle host his shit these days? Asking for a friend.
Yep, agree! That first paragraph is where I'm at now, trying to work with social scientists, business people, economists, who ever is keen. That interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary work is suuuuper interesting and fun and fucking hard.
Also I'm just opinionated in general, you know? 😅
I don't think that last bit is right, see my other comment to FireRetardant's reply. I think the increase in warming rate is basically instantaneous (maybe a few months for atmospheric mixing), it's the peak of temperature/heat that is delayed (agreeing with your 3rd paragraph)
Wow, doubly depressing
That's a cool rule! Kinda destroys that strategy though (TBH I can't even remember if uno has viable strategy)
Yep, plausible, but again, that's a social problem. It's super interesting, but not something a climate scientist can really speak to.
Yeah.. realising I was not making a distinction between greenhouse effect (e.g. increased rate of warming), and the result (e.g. actual increased heat content/temperature. I think the rate of warming increase is basically instant, but yes, it takes some time for the temperature levels to catch up.
I don't know if I was explicitly taught it at uni, buy I have always understood as a climate scientist that GHG emissions started before the industrial revolution (albeit small). I think that's common knowledge in climate science.
Sure. Right now, everyone has to make a trade-off between accepting a smaller network and engaging with corporate garbage designed to create rage and clicks. Personally I'm happy to sit on the smaller network and contribute a bit and wait for it to build naturally. That's why I'm here on Lemmy too.
Yes, we used to play that way. Basically any attack card could be stacked on top of a previous one (of a matching colour or type), and the first person who couldn't add to the stack got all the effects combined (so you might pick up 6 cards from a stack of +2s)
I edited in a reference - it's a thing aparently
My intuitive answer is that the collapse of globalised industrial society seems fairly likely (as a result of the end of cheap liquid fuel if nothing else). What that looks like is highly dependent on how we respond - it's not a climate problem, it's a social problem.
I don't think humans are going to go extinct, but a population crash seems likely. And we're taking out a tonne of other species.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycrisis
Especially if "you and me" includes corporations
Since it started in the mid 2010s, it's probably not AI related. That will be an extra addition..
Really? I've never heard of this, and I'm a climate scientist.. Not saying it's definitely wrong, but a citation would be good.
Edit: Huh, seems it's true: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/031001 although that is for large pulses of CO2, I don't know how that translates into a constant stream of emissions..
There's no way you can make a reasonable diagnosis from a 100 word Lemmy post, and doing so might be putting someone in danger.
Get help, kid
I only use it sporadically, but when I do, I often write replies and get replies. I think you need to mutually follow a lot of people before it starts working (like, a thousand or more). I'm not convinced the reply rate is significantly lower than BS or twitter..
Re: your last comment: for sure. To me that's another bonus of fediverse, e.g. since mastodon is at least partially able to interact with Lemmy and other fediverse apps, and that will presumably improve over time, eventually you will be able to do at lot of cross-app interaction from one place.
If you want microblogging social media just use mastodon (or one of it's forks). Even if Bluesky is decent now, it's owned by venture capital, so it's only a matter of time before it enshittifies.
Chill, bruh. This is literally a comm for asking what games to play. This is a fine question.