Just because they are responsible doesn't mean the have the means to exert their responsibility. Demanding birth-date upon (local) account creation would allow them to better exert that responsiblity.
It can be done like that, but then it'd be (trivially) fake-able by anyone with root permissions on their own computer. But then, my point is that kids shouldn't be root of their computers, so let's just parents vouch for children's age, and leave everything more complicated out.
From what I understood, the rules (in California?) would be :
a) Every operating system provider must collect the user’s age or date of birth during the initial account setup process.
b) The OS must classify the user into one of the four defined age brackets: under 13 years old, 13–15 years old, 16–17 years old, or 18 years and older.
c) This information must be made available to application developers through a real-time API as soon as an application is launched or downloaded.
Unless I've missed something, I could definitely live with that. I haven't seen anything more acceptable when it comes to age verification. Point a) doesn't need to prove age or date of birth.
Now there is a small issue that came to my mind since my first post, which might be quite problematic : if ANY website is able to tell whether ANY user is a child, it'll be as easy to keep children out of certain sites that it'll be easy to keep adults out of others.
Imagine a bulletin board with highly disturbing/predatory content which would ONLY show to kids? Whenever mom or dad checks, website is all normal. And that would be real bad, probably worse than our current, no age verified situation.
Be careful of rocketchat : beside some exotic technology choices (meteor), they seem to be in a dynamic of re-closing previously opensource parts of it. Something like that already occured with their ldap implementation (it needed some love, but sadly they give them closed-source love...)
their snapshots are marked as copy on write, so my assumption is that for every write, there is replication somewhere.
I might be wrong here, but my understanding is that their snapshots are the kind we find in modern filesystems (ZFS/BTRFS/...) : that is a point-in-time kind of functionnality, where a file will be duplicated (and the original version then will only belong to the snapshot) only when it is written to. This is just the way snapshots are implemented here - and a rather common way of doing it efficiently - not a reliability feature.
I don't mean automatically replicate anything, that would be pointless. But I'm still a reddit user myself, and from time to time I stumble onto something interesting, and I'd like to let it live on Lemmy as well.
L'idée est bonne, mais apparemment ça ne prend pas en compte les arrêts des lignes de Transilien. Typiquement, un trajet depuis Dammartin-Juilly-Saint-Mard (Transilien ligne K ET TER HDF K15) ne va montrer que les gares atteignables par le TER K15, pas celles atteignables par le Transilien.
There’s no such thing as a “dating league”. People are selective, but the nature of that selectivity depends on the individual.
Exactly this. I can't deal with anymore "rating" of people's attractiveness, as daily seen on Reddit and the such. Beauty, attractiveness, and overall interest a person generates is highly (if not solely) dependent on said interest's other end.
There is something deeply flawed in trying to put people into small, numbered boxes.
This might already be the case, but the guy deserves is own character and quest in Project Tamriel and/or Tamriel Rebuilt. This is way too young an age to go.
Let's hope they'll use Gendarmerie's almost 20 years of experience on that.
Just because they are responsible doesn't mean the have the means to exert their responsibility. Demanding birth-date upon (local) account creation would allow them to better exert that responsiblity.
It can be done like that, but then it'd be (trivially) fake-able by anyone with root permissions on their own computer. But then, my point is that kids shouldn't be root of their computers, so let's just parents vouch for children's age, and leave everything more complicated out.
From what I understood, the rules (in California?) would be : a) Every operating system provider must collect the user’s age or date of birth during the initial account setup process. b) The OS must classify the user into one of the four defined age brackets: under 13 years old, 13–15 years old, 16–17 years old, or 18 years and older. c) This information must be made available to application developers through a real-time API as soon as an application is launched or downloaded.
Unless I've missed something, I could definitely live with that. I haven't seen anything more acceptable when it comes to age verification. Point a) doesn't need to prove age or date of birth.
Now there is a small issue that came to my mind since my first post, which might be quite problematic : if ANY website is able to tell whether ANY user is a child, it'll be as easy to keep children out of certain sites that it'll be easy to keep adults out of others.
Imagine a bulletin board with highly disturbing/predatory content which would ONLY show to kids? Whenever mom or dad checks, website is all normal. And that would be real bad, probably worse than our current, no age verified situation.
oh, right, that too.... too bad, because UI/UX wise it has been pretty slick at some point
Be careful of rocketchat : beside some exotic technology choices (meteor), they seem to be in a dynamic of re-closing previously opensource parts of it. Something like that already occured with their ldap implementation (it needed some love, but sadly they give them closed-source love...)
Definitely better late than never. But this could have been done years ago.
Sur les 79 années que la France a connues depuis 1947, seules 26 se sont produites au XXIè siècle
you might want to add borg, restic and - more recently - plakar to that list
You could still use them as small, tangible containers.
Potiron (ou potimarron) châtaignes!
Why not something like NAS4Free or OpenMediaVault, then? You don't have to chose between DIY and paid-for, there is a middle-ground
Is RiMusic dead?
Question idiote d'un mec qui a trop joué à F29-Retaliator, mais y'a pas de canon sur un Rafale?
I might be wrong here, but my understanding is that their snapshots are the kind we find in modern filesystems (ZFS/BTRFS/...) : that is a point-in-time kind of functionnality, where a file will be duplicated (and the original version then will only belong to the snapshot) only when it is written to. This is just the way snapshots are implemented here - and a rather common way of doing it efficiently - not a reliability feature.
I don't mean automatically replicate anything, that would be pointless. But I'm still a reddit user myself, and from time to time I stumble onto something interesting, and I'd like to let it live on Lemmy as well.
I don't know how ethical it would be, and maybe it already exists, but a tool to replicate a Reddit post directly on a Lemmy instance could be useful
L'idée est bonne, mais apparemment ça ne prend pas en compte les arrêts des lignes de Transilien. Typiquement, un trajet depuis Dammartin-Juilly-Saint-Mard (Transilien ligne K ET TER HDF K15) ne va montrer que les gares atteignables par le TER K15, pas celles atteignables par le Transilien.
TL;DR it's much more beautiful but won't be free, as it'll need at least to buy some upgrade even if you had the original, switch1 game.
Exactly this. I can't deal with anymore "rating" of people's attractiveness, as daily seen on Reddit and the such. Beauty, attractiveness, and overall interest a person generates is highly (if not solely) dependent on said interest's other end.
There is something deeply flawed in trying to put people into small, numbered boxes.
This might already be the case, but the guy deserves is own character and quest in Project Tamriel and/or Tamriel Rebuilt. This is way too young an age to go.