Last time i checked china was mostly reliant on coal ? They shifted the energy production to something else ? Genuine question, if they took impactfull measures i'd be hapy to hear about it
I love it, i would just rename day runner in night runner, ad obviously the best moment to send scouts in an overheating planet is at night. You can still make it dangerous by adding night predators that roam the surfaces now, like dogs, bugs etc...
This is a more general situation but not exactly the same i think
"Everyone is a villain" says, a pov exists where you're the villain.
Here is more "one will fake a story where you are the villain" (a specific case where the pov in which you are the villain is faked to protect someone's interests)
I've seen the second a lot in breakups were one will find every excuse possible to not think they are the asshole, including gaslighting themselves into thinking the other is a monster respinsible for the whole thing.
Fun facts animals are not innocents. Rape, war and baby murder is quite common among them. Im vegan but blindly believe "mother nature" is perfect, peaceful and that animals lives in harmony is blatantly false lol
They didn't say food, they said cattle. Meat is as unecessary (except pzarticular health condition) as ai, and pollute more. Opposing ai for environnemental issues but not opposing meat at the same time is kinda contradictory
As if meat industry where not also driven by stock manipulation, exploitation, destruction of natural habitat, to grow food for developped country consumers, when a lot people still don't have safe access for food.
Meat delicious is based on personal taste. This argument is as valid as "using ai is so fun", so argument rejected
Palm oil gives nutrients, yet its cultivation pollute. Meat production pollute, and it's consumption can be reduced or replaced.
All I've seen AI do is concentrate wealth to the top 1%tech bros.
I agree. Also consider that meat industry has it's own big evil shareholder that exploit farmers to produce shit for consumers
My whole point is not ai good meat bad.
Its : if your argument against ai is water, energy and pollution (which i agree with, all this datacenter, hardware and energy consumption is nonsense compared to the little scope of where ai is useful), don't oppose it to farming industry, or also fight against intensive meat production, which also involves a john shareholder that destroys the planet
Meat is worse than AI for the environnement, and you can go without meat (except some health condition)
I work daily with my company's hosted LLM, and the last 6 months of use had the same environnemental impact as eating 10g of beef
Also i use an old model, in a country with mostly decarbonate electricity, and not with agentic mode, so it may have worse impact elsewhere
This is not an argument for ai though, pushing for ai use where it shouldn't be used is dumb, wasteful and armful for society, just saying that if you are a dev using llm for occasional help and prototyping, eating less meat will be far more helpful for the environnement
Last time i checked china was mostly reliant on coal ? They shifted the energy production to something else ? Genuine question, if they took impactfull measures i'd be hapy to hear about it
I love it, i would just rename day runner in night runner, ad obviously the best moment to send scouts in an overheating planet is at night. You can still make it dangerous by adding night predators that roam the surfaces now, like dogs, bugs etc...
This is a more general situation but not exactly the same i think
"Everyone is a villain" says, a pov exists where you're the villain.
Here is more "one will fake a story where you are the villain" (a specific case where the pov in which you are the villain is faked to protect someone's interests)
I've seen the second a lot in breakups were one will find every excuse possible to not think they are the asshole, including gaslighting themselves into thinking the other is a monster respinsible for the whole thing.
The most showery thought i'seen so far
Oh wow this is definitely something i was looking, thank you !
That's quite the point of lemmy, block instance you don't want to interact with, or better, open up to views that are not curated by US
And why are they all upside ? Space battle in star wars don't take full advantage of the verticality
Isn't all game interactive powerpoint with 30-60 slides a second ?
I've seen people buy second hand ps4 just to play Bloodborne then sell it again
Pffff nonsense, orange man don't keep ALL the ressources for him, like he shares a lot with Israel too !
Fun facts animals are not innocents. Rape, war and baby murder is quite common among them. Im vegan but blindly believe "mother nature" is perfect, peaceful and that animals lives in harmony is blatantly false lol
They didn't say food, they said cattle. Meat is as unecessary (except pzarticular health condition) as ai, and pollute more. Opposing ai for environnemental issues but not opposing meat at the same time is kinda contradictory
As if meat industry where not also driven by stock manipulation, exploitation, destruction of natural habitat, to grow food for developped country consumers, when a lot people still don't have safe access for food.
Meat delicious is based on personal taste. This argument is as valid as "using ai is so fun", so argument rejected
Yes
Palm oil gives nutrients, yet its cultivation pollute. Meat production pollute, and it's consumption can be reduced or replaced.
I agree. Also consider that meat industry has it's own big evil shareholder that exploit farmers to produce shit for consumers
My whole point is not ai good meat bad.
Its : if your argument against ai is water, energy and pollution (which i agree with, all this datacenter, hardware and energy consumption is nonsense compared to the little scope of where ai is useful), don't oppose it to farming industry, or also fight against intensive meat production, which also involves a john shareholder that destroys the planet
Meat is worse than AI for the environnement, and you can go without meat (except some health condition)
I work daily with my company's hosted LLM, and the last 6 months of use had the same environnemental impact as eating 10g of beef
Also i use an old model, in a country with mostly decarbonate electricity, and not with agentic mode, so it may have worse impact elsewhere
This is not an argument for ai though, pushing for ai use where it shouldn't be used is dumb, wasteful and armful for society, just saying that if you are a dev using llm for occasional help and prototyping, eating less meat will be far more helpful for the environnement
Kind of thought that makes the water bill explode