It probably says somewhere in the ToS, which is still a fucking disgrace that those exists, without having to make clear and obvious bullet points you click "consent".
Even having to make consent multiple times should be mandatory for every shit they try to do.
Solution if users shouldnt hit consent multiple times? Dont do shady shit.
Only the EU will ever give those kind of fines in that scale. In the US they will lobby (corrupt) their way out of it to get a symbolic slap on the wrist.
Or just make an AI post with Trump portrayed as God or something.
They could give it to the world, but it will still be for "power".
If this existed, alot of industries would die overnight, and alot of them are in the west, oil states in the middle east and Russia.
Fossil fuels would be almost redundant, as everything would start to run on electricity. (this will take some time ofc) China is also winning the EV race hard, so they will certinatly benefit big time.
China also invested alot of money and time in the third world, and that will all be new markets for them if this shift happens.
The dark horse in this would be the EU, as they are already shifting towards green power and EVs.
The wind power industry in Europe would be the biggest blow, and then ofc Norway would have alot of oil left. BUT Norway has invested heavily in that transition, so they might come out on the other side pretty great.
The point of the article is that they want to develop their own drugs. Not just hand over the model to drug companies for them to use and discover drugs.
The method is not new. But it's new that Antrophic will have a drug division.
Yeah, the US uses no propaganda whatsoever. :)
They didnt grow to it. Nobody just gave a shit before, because it wasnt against all skin colors.
Hasnt it always been like this on TV? If a show had bad ratings, it wasnt up for another season.
Now it's just so much "in your face" because the quantity of new shows has gone up.
Literally insane that you can even put that in an agreement to being with.
Doesnt matter if it's in kindergarten level reading, as long as it's a few paragraphs long, people will accept it.
It probably says somewhere in the ToS, which is still a fucking disgrace that those exists, without having to make clear and obvious bullet points you click "consent".
Even having to make consent multiple times should be mandatory for every shit they try to do.
Solution if users shouldnt hit consent multiple times? Dont do shady shit.
Even if you have to, at least try a little and let it make something that looks non-AI.
This solution makes sense. They need to phase out the existing rules properly, no matter how wrong they were to begin with.
Tax them from 10% til 100% over 5 years, and let them sell off as they go through that time spand maybe?
This is only to replace it with Palintir. Which makes this much, much worse.
In this case I hope for less offerings and a shittier product.
This fee is very impactful. If they are going to pay it.
How do you think users will pay for it?
Only the EU will ever give those kind of fines in that scale. In the US they will lobby (corrupt) their way out of it to get a symbolic slap on the wrist.
Or just make an AI post with Trump portrayed as God or something.
Why tf do they need to order that?! Meta should fucking remove it immideatly themselves!
They could give it to the world, but it will still be for "power".
If this existed, alot of industries would die overnight, and alot of them are in the west, oil states in the middle east and Russia.
Fossil fuels would be almost redundant, as everything would start to run on electricity. (this will take some time ofc) China is also winning the EV race hard, so they will certinatly benefit big time.
China also invested alot of money and time in the third world, and that will all be new markets for them if this shift happens.
The dark horse in this would be the EU, as they are already shifting towards green power and EVs.
The wind power industry in Europe would be the biggest blow, and then ofc Norway would have alot of oil left. BUT Norway has invested heavily in that transition, so they might come out on the other side pretty great.
The point of the article is that they want to develop their own drugs. Not just hand over the model to drug companies for them to use and discover drugs.
The method is not new. But it's new that Antrophic will have a drug division.
Well, AI for drugs is not a bad idea. Only because they can go through possible strings very fast, and then come up with some solutions to try.
AI is not in charge of testing, because how could it.
But drugs developed by AI, SHOULD be royalty free. But we all know it wont.
Haha what you on about. The EU have declined this over and over.
The reason it keeps coming up is because the EU is a democracy, where every member state can propose things.
Your critisism is towards the few politicians proposing this. Not the EU, who, so far, has been on our side.
Very big differences in these laws.
In Sweden they put the responsibility on the consumers. EU is putting the responsibility on the companies.
As you should.
And
If they choose recycle, they would need to do it themselves. But most likely, they will donate.
No matter what, someone is getting something at a lesser price than retail.
Or, they produce less. Which is very, very good.
Scary thing is he didnt really accomplish much with his sacrifies. NSA is much scarier today and things just goes on.