The 77Ah solid-state battery cells provided an energy density of 375 Wh/kg with over 600 cycles. According to Stellantis, the cells cut charging time from 10% to over 90% in just 18 minutes with discharge rates of up to 4C.
Isn't Waymo and others doing this as well? They do much more simulated training than real-world data to scale up use cases.
The article makes it seem only Chinese AVs are doing it
I don't think we're past all the climate tipping points; that'd start to cause runaway changes. Swift action right now would still provide a chance to lessen the impact.
The worst case scenarios would be truly disastrous though, and would cause secondary human conflicts due to unavailability of basic resources.
I fail to understand why they stick with fossil fuels even though renewable deployments are cheaper than ever. Although there's misinformation and politics, they should look at long term profits..
Damn it looks even more likely as per this article:
At the moment, there is a major obstacle to Musk’s self-driving ambitions: Federal regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have been hesitant to lay out a path for approving the next generation of robotic vehicles.
But with Musk now firmly in Trump’s inner circle, the billionaire is in a stronger position to influence development of federal rules that would put more of the cars on the road — an approach he proposed in a recent call with financial analysts.
Probably mandated by law to have those beepers.
They explain the problem very well imo.
From the linked sources:
Isn't Waymo and others doing this as well? They do much more simulated training than real-world data to scale up use cases.
The article makes it seem only Chinese AVs are doing it
I don't think we're past all the climate tipping points; that'd start to cause runaway changes. Swift action right now would still provide a chance to lessen the impact.
The worst case scenarios would be truly disastrous though, and would cause secondary human conflicts due to unavailability of basic resources.
And now even plans to do AI-generated ads:
It has to be Tesla that's liable I guess, when there's no safety driver. Although I didn't find any good example of a legal precedent in such cases.
More reporting:
https://youtu.be/ypj2ii--1Uc
The video has a link to all the sources used for it:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fifRcyUFtlKNvd8sVH_IU2iE1bpgxhDWqVVFcGmVyYY/edit?usp=drivesdk
Also the oceans:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a63612575/warming-ocean-temperatures/
There was too little rain this year which made the fires much worse.
I fail to understand why they stick with fossil fuels even though renewable deployments are cheaper than ever. Although there's misinformation and politics, they should look at long term profits..
It's crazy how they left HW3 and below cars abandoned. Tesla's promises are worthless.
https://v.redd.it/ir9jmtt3u65e1
Damn it looks even more likely as per this article:
It's alright. Yeah sites have caught up with tools like 12ft these days.
Still doesn't work lol.
Paywall..
From their Twitter: