Raid does not have such a precise definition; most neutral journalists would only describe the execution of a search warrant that way if it was more forceful than average, but there isn’t a bright line.
I think if someone knocks at your door and shows you a search warrant, and then not even proceeding with it, because the accused cooperated is I think clearly distinguishable from someone storming your house.
I think what you’re trying to say is that appointing a special rapporteur is one of the mildest actions that might reasonably be described as “the U.N. has launched an investigation”. True but mild is not “completely false”.
I'm not. I'm clearly highlighting that the claim that the U.N. has launched an investigation is, based on the material I have reviewed and provided, false. If there is official information that proves the investigation was indeed launched by the U.N. itself, then you're right.
Indeed, that is why I specifically stated: “(…) but was unable to independently verify R. Zitelmann’s claims.” As every other source I could find just repeated statements by him, so I though taking a guest article that is directly by him is the most accurate we can currently find. If there is a press release by the police, or similar I would like to see it.
It’s obviously a comparison of Putin to Hitler and I think any reasonable viewer would conclude that both are portrayed unfavorably. If that’s really what triggered a letter from the police, it’s cause for concern about freedom of expression in Germany.
I also represent the point of view that it was unjustified since it's clearly satire. I actually was surprised, that it wasn't about a different law I had in mind. But the comparison Nate has made is still misleading. I now think that including it wasn't worth it, and that I should've rather addressed the Stasi report system comparison Nate has made.
The word “raid” might be a little strong here, but so is “false” when the police actually did show up and seize his tablet because he called a politician an idiot on social media.
Let me make a comparison: If someone break somebody's leg, and a third party then makes a news coverage where they claim that someone has killed somebody. Would you still say that this is strongly worded? I think it's a completely false representation of what has happened.
The special rapporteurs is an independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council and are independent of any government or organization, including OHCHR and the UN, Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
Quote from the document:
Let me begin by thanking the German Government for the invitation and for facilitating this
official country visit.
Also, the accurate term is ”Android distribution” the term “Custom ROM” is outdated and technically inaccurate.
Regarding GrapheneOS I would advice you to read the information on the webpage of the installer on the official GOS website, it's very easy and tells you everything you need to know.
Hi, I checked your profile and it has no history aside this post, I most agree with the other people that seems a bit sketchy, would you mind giving some background info?
My recommendations would be: use normal Firefox if that works for you, install uBlock Origin, enable Strict Tracking Protection in the settings, disable all the telemetry, enable the “AI kill switch” if you do not want any AI (including on-device translations) in your browser.
Projects like GrapheneOS and LineageOS strongly discourage rooting your device.
From my understanding rooting strongly reduces the security of the OS as it allows for exploits and privilege execution which would otherwise not have been possibly.
Rooting is also detectable by some apps, which will therefore block you from using them.
Strict Google Play Integrity can AFAIK not be spoofed with root on your device from my understanding.
As far as I remember, TrackerControl actually says that if it recognizes the app as a browser, the listed network connections are most likely from websites you visit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Source?
In contrast to you two the post actually provides sources. :)
I think if someone knocks at your door and shows you a search warrant, and then not even proceeding with it, because the accused cooperated is I think clearly distinguishable from someone storming your house.
I'm not. I'm clearly highlighting that the claim that the U.N. has launched an investigation is, based on the material I have reviewed and provided, false. If there is official information that proves the investigation was indeed launched by the U.N. itself, then you're right.
Hey there, I appreciate your detailed response!
Indeed, that is why I specifically stated: “(…) but was unable to independently verify R. Zitelmann’s claims.” As every other source I could find just repeated statements by him, so I though taking a guest article that is directly by him is the most accurate we can currently find. If there is a press release by the police, or similar I would like to see it.
I also represent the point of view that it was unjustified since it's clearly satire. I actually was surprised, that it wasn't about a different law I had in mind. But the comparison Nate has made is still misleading. I now think that including it wasn't worth it, and that I should've rather addressed the Stasi report system comparison Nate has made.
Let me make a comparison: If someone break somebody's leg, and a third party then makes a news coverage where they claim that someone has killed somebody. Would you still say that this is strongly worded? I think it's a completely false representation of what has happened.
The special rapporteurs is an independent human rights experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council and are independent of any government or organization, including OHCHR and the UN, Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the UN or OHCHR.
Quote from the document:
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/statements/20260206-eom-stm-europe-central-asia-region-sr-protection-right-en.pdf
I apologize, but have you actually read the document by the special rapporteur? One of the primary concerns highlighted was about hate speech.
https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/statements/20260206-eom-stm-europe-central-asia-region-sr-protection-right-en.pdf
Please keep this discussion civil. And yes, I don't get paid for this type of work.
Both are based on LineageOS and they only support devices that LineageOS doesn't support based on partnerships with the company of the phone.
Did you check if the Samsung device is officially supported by LineageOS?
https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/
Also, the accurate term is ”Android distribution” the term “Custom ROM” is outdated and technically inaccurate.
Regarding GrapheneOS I would advice you to read the information on the webpage of the installer on the official GOS website, it's very easy and tells you everything you need to know.
https://grapheneos.org/install/web
Trustpilot ig.
Mailbox; it's also recommended by PrivacyGuides. Privacy Policy.
I would say that isn't going to happen, if we don't stop fighting.
I live in the European Union.
Hi, I checked your profile and it has no history aside this post, I most agree with the other people that seems a bit sketchy, would you mind giving some background info?
Apparently people can't read: OP is specifically asking for an email app that let you create folders.
Have you tested the other email apps on F-Droid?
My recommendations would be: use normal Firefox if that works for you, install uBlock Origin, enable Strict Tracking Protection in the settings, disable all the telemetry, enable the “AI kill switch” if you do not want any AI (including on-device translations) in your browser.
Projects like GrapheneOS and LineageOS strongly discourage rooting your device.
From my understanding rooting strongly reduces the security of the OS as it allows for exploits and privilege execution which would otherwise not have been possibly.
Rooting is also detectable by some apps, which will therefore block you from using them.
Strict Google Play Integrity can AFAIK not be spoofed with root on your device from my understanding.
Very on-topic: https://loops.video/v/gGFPxjD8Kz
It would be helpful if you would put in the title and description in which jurisdiction you live in.
As far as I remember, TrackerControl actually says that if it recognizes the app as a browser, the listed network connections are most likely from websites you visit.
Source? Also, some spaces do not allow politics; could that have been the reason?