when i try to reach out, if i even find someone that listens..well. it doen't end well or they just stay silent and leave basically, like never to contact me again unless they need something (which i don't indulge anymore, thus i realized i was alone for a long time before i realized)
This post is a perfect example of everything people criticize about the modern “left.” Not because it disagrees with Charlie Kirk, but because it reduces an entire person to race, gender, and resentment instead of engaging with ideas.
You can think his views were wrong, shallow, or even outright harmful, but dismissing someone as just “a mediocre white man” is exactly the kind of identity based tribalism the left claims to oppose.
And regardless of how much people hated his politics, Charlie Kirk openly debated people who disagreed with him. He went onto hostile campuses, argued face to face, answered questions, and defended his positions publicly. That already puts him above a huge part of modern political culture, where too many people prefer censorship, deplatforming, mob shaming, or labeling disagreement as “harm.”
As for myself, I didn’t agree with everything Charlie Kirk said, and I still don’t. But I deeply respect what he was doing. Peaceful exchange of ideas.
I’m an atheist myself, raised Christian, and honestly I would have loved debating him about religion. Not because I think I would magically “win,” but because that kind of respectful clash of ideas is healthy. People sharpen each other through discussion. Through challenge. Through disagreement.
No person is an island. We’re social creatures. People grow by debating, listening, challenging each other, and trying to understand different perspectives. Open discourse is infinitely healthier than censorship and ideological purity tests.
Ironically, many of the people constantly screaming “fascist” are the same ones trying to silence, deplatform, shame, or censor anyone who disagrees with them. That mentality, “agree with me or you are evil and must be silenced,” is itself authoritarian.
A real democracy requires tolerance for disagreement. It requires accepting that there can be multiple ways to solve problems, even if you strongly prefer one over another.
The post itself proves the point more than it refutes it. Instead of counterarguments, it goes straight to race, identity, and contempt. No discussion, no nuance, no engagement with why millions of people listened to him in the first place. Just “white man bad.”
You can despise someone’s ideas and still defend their right to speak and debate openly. In fact, that’s the entire point of free discourse and freedom of speech.
Most people aren’t ready to be unplugged. Their minds struggle to process the kind of reality the scientific method has revealed, truths that are often counterintuitive, unsettling, and far removed from everyday intuition.
Even something as fundamental as the certainty of death, the idea that consciousness may simply cease, can be too much to fully confront. For many, that is not just uncomfortable, it is existentially destabilizing. So they turn to belief systems, often inherited early in life, that provide structure, meaning, and emotional security.
That does not necessarily make those systems wrong, but they can discourage questioning when taken as absolute truth. It is easier to accept a fixed narrative than to sit with uncertainty. Very few people are willing to seriously question what lies beyond their own beliefs, about reality, the human condition, or the universe itself.
So yeah, most people are not ready to be unplugged. Many will defend the very frameworks that keep them from questioning, because those frameworks are what make reality feel stable and livable.
was being sarcastic, trying to represent the majority of people that, as history shown time and time again, doesn't matter is we see it coming, we go full throttle ahead
Me TOO!! i sent emails to support, posted on a google forums thread, this was like what, 13 years ago already?, eventually the thread got deleted, reach out to google support, they told me to take it with them, they never ever replied. so since then i never purchased a "lifetime" of anything
fuck them.
the app was very good though, and while typing this i got myself worked out and realized im still livid
edit: bought cerberus un 2015, got the
Hi xta,
Your Cerberus license will expire soon. If you want to continue to use our services please consider buying a license.
Click here to buy a license through secure payment!
Thank You
The Cerberus Team
no way this is not gonna backfire for them somehow or somewho
at least op has
when i try to reach out, if i even find someone that listens..well. it doen't end well or they just stay silent and leave basically, like never to contact me again unless they need something (which i don't indulge anymore, thus i realized i was alone for a long time before i realized)
Waitl until she discovers the bidet
This post is a perfect example of everything people criticize about the modern “left.” Not because it disagrees with Charlie Kirk, but because it reduces an entire person to race, gender, and resentment instead of engaging with ideas.
You can think his views were wrong, shallow, or even outright harmful, but dismissing someone as just “a mediocre white man” is exactly the kind of identity based tribalism the left claims to oppose.
And regardless of how much people hated his politics, Charlie Kirk openly debated people who disagreed with him. He went onto hostile campuses, argued face to face, answered questions, and defended his positions publicly. That already puts him above a huge part of modern political culture, where too many people prefer censorship, deplatforming, mob shaming, or labeling disagreement as “harm.”
As for myself, I didn’t agree with everything Charlie Kirk said, and I still don’t. But I deeply respect what he was doing. Peaceful exchange of ideas.
I’m an atheist myself, raised Christian, and honestly I would have loved debating him about religion. Not because I think I would magically “win,” but because that kind of respectful clash of ideas is healthy. People sharpen each other through discussion. Through challenge. Through disagreement.
No person is an island. We’re social creatures. People grow by debating, listening, challenging each other, and trying to understand different perspectives. Open discourse is infinitely healthier than censorship and ideological purity tests.
Ironically, many of the people constantly screaming “fascist” are the same ones trying to silence, deplatform, shame, or censor anyone who disagrees with them. That mentality, “agree with me or you are evil and must be silenced,” is itself authoritarian.
A real democracy requires tolerance for disagreement. It requires accepting that there can be multiple ways to solve problems, even if you strongly prefer one over another.
The post itself proves the point more than it refutes it. Instead of counterarguments, it goes straight to race, identity, and contempt. No discussion, no nuance, no engagement with why millions of people listened to him in the first place. Just “white man bad.”
You can despise someone’s ideas and still defend their right to speak and debate openly. In fact, that’s the entire point of free discourse and freedom of speech.
Most people aren’t ready to be unplugged. Their minds struggle to process the kind of reality the scientific method has revealed, truths that are often counterintuitive, unsettling, and far removed from everyday intuition.
Even something as fundamental as the certainty of death, the idea that consciousness may simply cease, can be too much to fully confront. For many, that is not just uncomfortable, it is existentially destabilizing. So they turn to belief systems, often inherited early in life, that provide structure, meaning, and emotional security.
That does not necessarily make those systems wrong, but they can discourage questioning when taken as absolute truth. It is easier to accept a fixed narrative than to sit with uncertainty. Very few people are willing to seriously question what lies beyond their own beliefs, about reality, the human condition, or the universe itself.
So yeah, most people are not ready to be unplugged. Many will defend the very frameworks that keep them from questioning, because those frameworks are what make reality feel stable and livable.
you are using the word billion incorrectly, a billion is a million million, and it was 20 thousand millons, not 40.
you are using the word billion incorrectly, a billion is a million million, and it was 20 thousand millons, not 40.
the "media" doesn't "think" they all just push their current agenda
Twice.
The IT Crowd
Also, china is not comunist.
and manipulated to fight against each other, against your own interests
I'd rather he be prosecuted to the full extend of the law and spent the rest of his days in jail, like not being a menace to society anymore.
RDR2 (PC)
how dare you to assume it´s gender?
/s
i welcome death by snu snu
if you can afford lip filler, you can afford in a babysitter instead of put their lives at risk, just my 2 cents....
was being sarcastic, trying to represent the majority of people that, as history shown time and time again, doesn't matter is we see it coming, we go full throttle ahead
Me TOO!! i sent emails to support, posted on a google forums thread, this was like what, 13 years ago already?, eventually the thread got deleted, reach out to google support, they told me to take it with them, they never ever replied. so since then i never purchased a "lifetime" of anything
fuck them.
the app was very good though, and while typing this i got myself worked out and realized im still livid
edit: bought cerberus un 2015, got the
Hi xta, Your Cerberus license will expire soon. If you want to continue to use our services please consider buying a license. Click here to buy a license through secure payment! Thank You The Cerberus Team
email on late dec 2019.
so worry but not panicking yet. gotcha, nothing will be done then.