zaknenou

u/zaknenou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
41 posts · 376 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

on Where is the lie? · c/memes · 1 pts · 296d

the more you disagree the more it is apparent, I vote to delete this violent meme

on I got infected like an idiot · c/piracy · 13 pts · 321d

a reminder that you do need an Antivirus in fact as a pirate. Oh People, stop listening to cybersec experts who spend their whole life using foss or buying legit software, they're in a different world from us pirates.

Also a reminder that it happens to the best of us anyway.

on Have a good day · c/adhd · 4 pts · 332d

the problem is when you sign for a job, or postpone it, into a time when this hyperworkmode is required, but it doesn't activate cuz this job ain't one of those things that you get obsessed over.

on Free energy mod! · c/linkedinlunatics · 2 pts · 332d

I remember the one where he uses two magnets, and the one where he wraps his head with a bag and puts a plant inside it, so he can swim with infinite O2 supply.

hmm, it seems to me that I didn't write long paragraphs. I just said that I see "voting for lesser of two evils is consenting for evil". And USA ran a 2 years long genocide in Gaza recently, they're actually running a war close to my country periodically. It makes sense that I don't distinguish much between the politicians who make decisions, and the population that is voting them in repeatedly.

Voting is not consent.

That's where we disagree. And just to make it clear, I'm not from USA, I'm just offering a critic. You might as well recall that I said I'm not your opponent :).

on Free energy mod! · c/linkedinlunatics · 28 pts · 333d

As someone who sucks at physics, I'm convinced that Trollface has proposed so many solutions around the internet to provide free energy, but the capitalists are conspiring to sabotage him, just as they did to N.Tesla.

In my view your idea is consent to the two party system, which is not explicitly forced by the constitution, but is being enforced more and more over time by your own behavior. One needs to have limits at least on what they consent to, even when their choice is neglect afterwards. The fact that not even both parties offered a pro zionist candidate, but even inside the democrat party, both candidates (Biden then Harris) were explicitly pro Zionist, this shows where loyalty to an institution no matter what leads to.
Christianity is often ridiculed for for being fanatic, but even though it is a religion, it had reforms (Martin Luther and the protestant denomination eventually) when the main Catholic church was corrupt (I'm sorry for the Christians reading this if I'm getting history wrong). My point is: this was a religion and accepted reforms, here we're merely talking about a political party, a progressive one if I'm not wrong.