Have this on my camera roll from 2016 lmao
Those moles have seen some shit.
Americans will use anything but the metric system.
At least they tried using it this time
I'm pretty sure we used this textbook in my highschool chemistry class. Or at least it also used that illustration.
i distinctly recognize those weird eyes
That's clearly more than a litter of mole
Is it? What if you press them down to fill the gaps?
Okay, but how many moles of mole per mole are we talking about?
At least 1
And yet, no more than 1
Wüge
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wug
For anyone else confused about this comment. :)
Wow, you guys are abstract!
It was a running gag in a linguistics meme page on The Other Side. I'm impressed you made the effort to research it!
Ok but why are they naked?
Maybe they just feel more comfortable that way, don't yuck their yumm my dude!
Stupid question. Why are you?
I’m uhh
Just two? We build whole societies, you know.
Standardized mole.
This is a conjecture, at best.
How do I verify the beaker’s volume is actually a litre?
Pokemon?
23 Comments
Rongbipper@lemmy.ca · 44 pts · 2y
Have this on my camera roll from 2016 lmao
don@lemm.ee · 25 pts · 2y
Those moles have seen some shit.
scaryjelly@lemm.ee · 24 pts · 2y
Americans will use anything but the metric system.
RandomVideos@programming.dev · 9 pts · 2y
At least they tried using it this time
lgmjon64@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 2y
I'm pretty sure we used this textbook in my highschool chemistry class. Or at least it also used that illustration.
Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 2y
i distinctly recognize those weird eyes
sirico@feddit.uk · 11 pts · 2y
That's clearly more than a litter of mole
oce@jlai.lu · 2 pts · 2y
Is it? What if you press them down to fill the gaps?
rtxn@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y
Okay, but how many moles of mole per mole are we talking about?
Natanael@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 2y
At least 1
RobMyBot@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 2y
And yet, no more than 1
lugal@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 2y
Wüge
perishthethought@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 2y
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wug
For anyone else confused about this comment. :)
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2y
Wow, you guys are abstract!
lugal@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 2y
It was a running gag in a linguistics meme page on The Other Side. I'm impressed you made the effort to research it!
watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 2y
Ok but why are they naked?
SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 2y
Maybe they just feel more comfortable that way, don't yuck their yumm my dude!
Nacktmull@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
Stupid question. Why are you?
watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 2y
I’m uhh
Nacktmull@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y
Just two? We build whole societies, you know.
MonkderZweite@feddit.ch · 2 pts · 2y
Standardized mole.
AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y
This is a conjecture, at best.
How do I verify the beaker’s volume is actually a litre?
pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 2y
Pokemon?