A little fear is good

543 points · 49 comments · view on lemmy.world

49 Comments

TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works · 95 pts · 2y

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 60 pts · 2y (42 replies)

Ive seen this exact joke with another monster

wols@lemm.ee · 22 pts · 2y

Congrats, you've just discovered internet memes.

Bombastic@sopuli.xyz · 15 pts · 2y (2 replies)

But this one make more sense because Tanith keeps her word and goes from "would" to "did"

PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 2y

Does that count if it was before she had a hongri snek boi she was fattening up to have as a pre-made sausage?

ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de · 1 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
TachyonTele@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 2y (35 replies)

Same. Yet another internet comic just blatantly stealing from another one.

fushuan@lemm.ee · 33 pts · 2y (6 replies)

it's a reference to elden ring. That's Tanith and Rickard/the serpent.

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 2y (5 replies)

And the original comic was about A biblically accurate angel. They just ripped it off. I posted it elsewhere in this thread.

samus12345@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 2y (3 replies)

I'd say it's more of a parody/homage, although since the original isn't well-known it needs to be presented along with this one.

TachyonTele@lemm.ee · 0 pts · 2y (2 replies)

the original isn't well known

This comic got called out immediately by multiple people

samus12345@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 2y (1 reply)

But it was called a "rip-off" when it was clearly parodying the original.

Zorque@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2y

That doesn't mean the original isn't well know, just that people often take the worst possible angle.

LazerFX@sh.itjust.works · -4 pts · 2y

No you haven't...

ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y (27 replies)

Idk if either of you are aware of this but sometimes, two different people, who have never interacted in any way, can come up with the same idea.

In a world with 8 billion people it's hard to have an original thought and even harder to put that thought out before someone else does.

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 46 pts · 2y (25 replies)

It's word for word the same comic and the same angles and everything. Stop trying to be a smart-ass if you don't know what you're talking about.

samus12345@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2y (16 replies)

Is this the original? Having the "monster" be an angel and labeling the person "monster fucker" makes it actually make sense to me.

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 2y (15 replies)

Yep. This comic even has its own know your meme page

samus12345@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y (14 replies)

Harsh to call this a "rip-off", then.

TachyonTele@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y

... because it's obviously ripping it off?

jounniy@ttrpg.network · 9 pts · 2y (5 replies)

I still don't get the ,,would".

ICastFist@programming.dev · 14 pts · 2y (2 replies)

In the OP's comic, it certainly takes longer to figure "would what?"

The original above with the angel has "monster fucker" on the person, so it's a bit easier to deduce, "would fuck"

jounniy@ttrpg.network · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Oh. Yeah. But why afraid?

ICastFist@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y

The dragon (and the angel) doesn't want to be seen as someone that a silly human would want to fuck, so it's "you're supposed to be afraid enough of me that you won't want to have sex with me"

TachyonTele@lemm.ee · 10 pts · 2y

Would have sex

Iheartcheese@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2y

Kind of a meme to say that when you are looking at someone you would fuck

samus12345@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y

ceenote@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 2y

He's setting expectations appropriately with that shirt, what more do you want?

TachyonTele@lemm.ee · 8 pts · 2y

That's not what happens when people use the same word bubbles or images and change them.

Scootsindbq@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Meta

ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de · 2 pts · 2y

Meta is self-reference, not just any reference

JayDee@lemmy.ml · 21 pts · 2y (1 reply)

So in this case, is the "Would." Implying "I would fuck that."? Is this another format of "Hear me out..."?

Starkstruck@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y

Yes

Anticorp@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 2y (2 replies)

I don't get it.

nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 30 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I would
(slang, idiomatic) Used to denote that the speaker finds another person sexually attractive.

Anticorp@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 2y

Thanks.

jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 2y

the Biblical Angel/I Forgot Who It Was one was better