I'm not sure if he's actually controversial, but Enrico Tartarotti is a youtuber with at least one video about software design where the comments said it was inspired by the sponsorship in it, and a different one that seemed to subtextually deny that it is imprtant for designers to know what experts want.
Ah yes, the two most communist institutions in the world: centrist political party and dictatorship with central planning elements that hates oligarchs
Also Tris 'No Boilerplate' Oaten got me into programming some random stuff in Rust, which is a very cool language because it has enums and a type system and a distinction between borrowing an object via a pointer and giving it over via a pointer (really sucks to implement a lisp in C because it doesn't have this, or at least it requires new C experience I don't have that borrow checking elegantly replaces)
Also you might read https://browser.engineering/
or you might read https://wayland-book.com/ to implement what browser engineering does while importing less other peoples code, or watch Handmade Hero, though I haven't personally gotten very far on that.
I get very motivated to program things in pointless sandboxes, like ComputerCraft, Fancade, Logo (programming language), Geometry Dash. This might train my brain and teach me some basic concepts like SoA vs AoS (fancade, but accidentally), network architecture (ComputerCraft), but I'm also not really sure what to do for relevant reality topics.
I also do codegolf.stackexchange.com which has some pretty cool challenges.
I fundamentally don't understand being a script kiddie (scripts from other people) because my number two Pain Causing Learning Activity is using other peoples libraries (after University Writing Projects), but I share the want/need discrepancy between how much I want to learn and how much might be good for me if I just got started.
If I were a really smart philosopher, i would know which level of knowledge received wisdom about sports belong on, and would probably say something witty about climate change relative to it
If you're german, you might know about TheJoCraft. A minecraft youtuber redstone enthusiast who doesn't really do anything bad, but I've stopped caring about their content, and also he hilariously had an old video complaining about specifically clickbait that has untrue statements in it, and then later his thumbnails are very mid cringe, though maybe they're technically not lying.
No, I was tagged when we went inside when the next lesson started, so it was unfair and didn't count, but I tagged them back and that also didn't count
As you seem to allude, the ontology of something like magnetism is an unknowable thing in the details of how it works, like whether the magnetic field exists and influences and is influenced by magnetic things, or whether magnetic things can (or "have the disposition to") react to the presence of other magnetic things in their environment, somehow directly; I imagine this as a relation that magnetic things have with each other that influences their movement and electric current.
I agree that disagreement about which one it is is not heresy as you describe. But only when you can name what your ontological view does better than a different one will I start to care about it.
Every "ontological view" seems to only have value for explaining how to understand the empirical science being done. This might sound weird to people who really want to have a belief about how things actually are, but I think it only makes sense to say how things are when it has been verified, and everything below that gets designed by theoretical physicists to make the calculations easier, or by you or other philosophers to try imagining how much sense it would make. When brought to reflect about it, I will always say that I don't hold any absolute beliefs about how things are, I just entertain them when they are consistent and useful to me. I think this makes me a pragmatist.
Because I don't want to autodidact every bit of Draftout strategy before playing it? Or do you mean larger teams where there is insufficient communication between teammates that have been randomly assigned?
Oh no! He has accidentally produced AI != God sentiment
programmierer, wenn sie ein platzhalter-muster brauchen:
I'm not sure if he's actually controversial, but Enrico Tartarotti is a youtuber with at least one video about software design where the comments said it was inspired by the sponsorship in it, and a different one that seemed to subtextually deny that it is imprtant for designers to know what experts want.
Ah yes, the two most communist institutions in the world: centrist political party and dictatorship with central planning elements that hates oligarchs
Also Tris 'No Boilerplate' Oaten got me into programming some random stuff in Rust, which is a very cool language because it has enums and a type system and a distinction between borrowing an object via a pointer and giving it over via a pointer (really sucks to implement a lisp in C because it doesn't have this, or at least it requires new C experience I don't have that borrow checking elegantly replaces)
Also you might read https://browser.engineering/ or you might read https://wayland-book.com/ to implement what browser engineering does while importing less other peoples code, or watch Handmade Hero, though I haven't personally gotten very far on that.
I get very motivated to program things in pointless sandboxes, like ComputerCraft, Fancade, Logo (programming language), Geometry Dash. This might train my brain and teach me some basic concepts like SoA vs AoS (fancade, but accidentally), network architecture (ComputerCraft), but I'm also not really sure what to do for relevant reality topics.
I also do codegolf.stackexchange.com which has some pretty cool challenges.
I fundamentally don't understand being a script kiddie (scripts from other people) because my number two Pain Causing Learning Activity is using other peoples libraries (after University Writing Projects), but I share the want/need discrepancy between how much I want to learn and how much might be good for me if I just got started.
If I were a really smart philosopher, i would know which level of knowledge received wisdom about sports belong on, and would probably say something witty about climate change relative to it
If you're german, you might know about TheJoCraft. A minecraft youtuber redstone enthusiast who doesn't really do anything bad, but I've stopped caring about their content, and also he hilariously had an old video complaining about specifically clickbait that has untrue statements in it, and then later his thumbnails are very mid cringe, though maybe they're technically not lying.
No, I was tagged when we went inside when the next lesson started, so it was unfair and didn't count, but I tagged them back and that also didn't count
Thanks for clarifying so much that I now agree
14:03
As you seem to allude, the ontology of something like magnetism is an unknowable thing in the details of how it works, like whether the magnetic field exists and influences and is influenced by magnetic things, or whether magnetic things can (or "have the disposition to") react to the presence of other magnetic things in their environment, somehow directly; I imagine this as a relation that magnetic things have with each other that influences their movement and electric current.
I agree that disagreement about which one it is is not heresy as you describe. But only when you can name what your ontological view does better than a different one will I start to care about it.
Every "ontological view" seems to only have value for explaining how to understand the empirical science being done. This might sound weird to people who really want to have a belief about how things actually are, but I think it only makes sense to say how things are when it has been verified, and everything below that gets designed by theoretical physicists to make the calculations easier, or by you or other philosophers to try imagining how much sense it would make. When brought to reflect about it, I will always say that I don't hold any absolute beliefs about how things are, I just entertain them when they are consistent and useful to me. I think this makes me a pragmatist.
Are you going to diss every sin and every virtue?
Because I don't want to autodidact every bit of Draftout strategy before playing it? Or do you mean larger teams where there is insufficient communication between teammates that have been randomly assigned?
Not smoking when you haven't started is really easy, because it smells awful
worrying whether I subconsciously worry too much or am stressed too much, because I'm bad at inspecting my emotions and my subconscious weirds me out