Jensen Huang says there is '0% chance' AI destroys the world by 2030 — 'We should go as fast as we can, irrespective of anyone else,' dismisses Anthropic doom warnings and rejects new regulations

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/jensen-huang-says-there-is-0-percent-chance-ai-destroys-the-world-by-2030-we-should-go-as-fast-as-we-can-irrespective-of-anyone-else-dismisses-anthropic-doom-warnings-and-rejects-new-regulations

288 points · 133 comments · view on lemmy.world

133 Comments

stoy@lemmy.zip · 178 pts · 4d (6 replies)

What he means is:

"You should keep buying our expensive product as fast as possible, no matter what anyone else says!"

deeprlyeh@lemmus.org · 9 pts · 4d (4 replies)

If AI wins or doesn’t, he will still make all the money. No, reason to not trust him.

snooggums@piefed.world · 17 pts · 4d (1 reply)

He willl make less money if AI slows down, so his opinion can't be trusted.

Malica@lemmy.zip · -1 pts · 3d

No, his GPUs are here to stay in the world on computing

JcbAzPx@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d

They've got so much money tied up in chatbot infrastructure that when the bubble pops, they'll be in a bad way. They've got to desperately prop it up to survive.

M137@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

What's with that comma? It makes no sense.

jystfact@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 4d

Right? Like this should be obvious and shouldn't need explaining. Shovel seller saying to keep digging deeper.

eestileib@sh.itjust.works · 103 pts · 4d (4 replies)

"buy my shit buy it buy it buy it"

sundray@lemmus.org · 10 pts · 4d (2 replies)
jballs@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 4d

This album got me through highschool. And still rocks hard as balls to this day.

eestileib@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 4d

Fuck yes

tacosanonymous@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 4d

“The only way for the bubble not to burst is for me to make it so much bigger.”

RodgeGrabTheCat@lemmy.ca · 66 pts · 4d (9 replies)

While I do see AI usage as a danger, I don't see an AI gaining super intelligence within 3 years and killing everyone.

The pollution from the data centers is the bigger threat as is the cognitive decline of the users.

Goodeye8@piefed.social · 20 pts · 4d (2 replies)

The problem isn't AI gaining intelligence, it's allowing AI to have agency and then it gets an potentially dangerous prompt that leads it to hack into, just for the sake of being funny, a bunch of places to delete the entire stock market. As funny as it would be it would lead to a complete economic collapse. I'd actually feel safer if it did have actual intelligence. We're talking about a technology where if you have broken unit tests (software term meaning a certain set of tests the code has to pass to be considered functional) and you tell AI to "fix the unit tests" there's a non-zero chance of it just deleting the tests and saying it's fixed.

AI is dangerous not in the way movies present it where it gains sentience and wipes us out. It's dangerous in the opposite way where it doesn't have intelligence and wipes us out because it doesn't understand it's doing something that's going to kill us.

ElChinchilla@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Exactly. Water issues/food issues/breathable atmosphere... not a problem if there are no more living things!

toynbee@piefed.social · 3 pts · 3d

Yeah, but we need paperclips! How else do you reset things?

moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com · 11 pts · 4d (1 reply)

The reason AI is a danger is because it's dumb.

They're literally giving it bombs and complete autonomy in drones already

What happens when you give a very unintelligent baby a chambered pistol with the safety off? Now do that with tens of thousands of babies.

toynbee@piefed.social · 2 pts · 3d

I think that's how you get the populace to talk about The Simpsons for an entire summer.

atrielienz@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d
dreamkeeper@literature.cafe · 0 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Those are both valid threats however we've also seen LLM agents so some really dangerous stuff with hacking already. They can do a lot of damage to the world just by messing with software. If they attacked the right places the global economy could literally collapse. We're thoroughly dependent on software to keep nearly everything running these days.

snooggums@piefed.world · 6 pts · 4d

Like junior devs being handed too much access and being told if they don't make eveeyone happy they will be fired.

But faster.

zidanerick@lemmy.patton.id.au · -1 pts · 4d

AI Usage should almost be like that teacher that was really good at school. Engaging you to make you better, not replacing you or brainrotting to hell.

I do think the two professions that are likely about to die however are customer service (not all, just 90% of call centre workers) and non-tool assisted programmers.

AI coding is going to be the future but instead of just big corporations doing it people should be using it for building out tools they need. AI in it's current state is just a smart printer and I'm sure there are a lot of business ideas we haven't even come up with yet that will make humans and AI complementary, not one to replace another.

I would rather not have AI at all, but pandora's box is already open and if we don't at least try and integrate it into our workflows we will be left behind.

RustyNova@lemmy.world · 55 pts · 4d (2 replies)

TBF, he's right. AI won't destroy the world. Humans using AI will.

Rothe@piefed.social · 8 pts · 4d

And especially humans peddling AI.

oce@jlai.lu · 1 pts · 4d

They are called AI because they are made to simulate humans, so I guess they will also be able to do that by themselves at some point.

Rookeh@startrek.website · 42 pts · 4d (7 replies)

Something tells me that he might not be completely objective...

RustySharp@programming.dev · 16 pts · 4d

Leopards say there's 0% chance they would eat everyone's faces by 2030. Advocates accelerating leopard breeding programs, despite local leopard breeder warnings.

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 4d

Man selling shovels in a gold rush says there's gold out there, and it is in no way uranium that will give you cancer if you fill your pockets with it. Just keep buying shovels.

The_v@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

Maybe if we knew what the forecast for sales is from AI until 2030 we would know for sure: 60%, 70%, 80%, even 90%?

SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 4d (1 reply)

"and you should all be wearing black leather jackets!!"

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

Motherfucker ended the coolness of leather jackets in one swell foop.

laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Well he is kinda right you'd don't want to give epe files linked morons evaluator power

Agrivar@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

epe files linked morons evaluator power

come again?

Randelung@lemmy.world · 36 pts · 4d (2 replies)

No, the gold rush isn't over, says shovel salesman.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 3d

its the jackets, he wants it solid gold.

Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d

Definitely no need to regulate my shovels!

houndeyes@toast.ooo · 36 pts · 4d (1 reply)

We should go as fast as we can

Stockton Rush vibes.

realitaetsverlust@piefed.zip · 13 pts · 4d

I, for one, would appreciate the demise of another billionaire

FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 30 pts · 4d

You’re so close to the gold bro, just buy a couple more shovels.

dudeface@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 4d (13 replies)

I agree with him purely because an LLM is not intelligent, any time you hear about it doing something like hacking on its own it was a marketing stunt

CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 4d (3 replies)

I didn't read this as AI sentients but as AI killing the world through its irresponsible use of resources like water and electricity.

Basically, he's saying "I need to get as rich as possible so that I can have enough money to survive the water wars."

Palerider@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Problem with that kind of thinking is that once society has gone down the pan, money is worthless...

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d

I only plan 5 seconds ahead and it's worked for me for thirty years and all I've got to say is that when anoAAAAAAAAARGGHHHHHHH AAAAAAH MAKE IT STOP MAKE IT STOP

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d

That's such a weak attack. The water and resources are being depleted by the second and irreparably because of capitalism and infinite exponential growth, the real problem is that it is a means to influence and control billions of people, take away their jobs, and decide how wars are waged and how our societies are run, and it's all up to some dumb cunt with an engineering degree who never got laid or read a book that wasn't all equations in their life.

That's not democracy, that's feudalism. That's a private citizen determining the fate of humanity because they were good at making money.

Because, like, as we all know, being greedy makes you the perfect candidate for being in charge of a planetary society, right?

MehBlah@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 4d (7 replies)

My son in law doesn't believe that. You can tell he is down the rabbit hole on it. Its pretty clear this is all happening to create the lie that these algorithmic word salads have volition.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d (6 replies)

The lack of volition is not a problem, the volition of those owning the means of information is.

"Guns don't kill people, people do."

Yeah, sure, so let's make sure not every fucking rando has an AK ok?

MehBlah@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d (5 replies)

The volition is entirely human. Its a grift. a scam. Where they set up their little games and claim the their scripts did it on their own.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 4d (4 replies)

Hey listen I'm with you all the way. I just think the problem goes deeper than AI. They're abusing the power of money to get away with anything- we shout "hey stop that you could get us all killed!" and they're like "Sure but think of the money I'll make!" and go ahead with it because they kick back to the rulers who let them.

It's like the atom bomb. Whoever gets it first will get to dominate everyone else, why do you think they're sprinting?

MehBlah@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (3 replies)

Yeah, That is a large part of it. The problem is that the type of people willing to do this should not be allowed in a position of power. They and other like them are the reason why mental health has been systemically dismantled in the US. After all when you know there is something wrong with you the last thing you want is a system that can spot you and prevent you from being a horrible person.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (2 replies)

Preach. But genuinely I think that the reason they defund all that shit it's because they want people to buy it from them instead, ignoring the fact that those who most need help often lack the means to pay for private alternatives.

Proper funding of nental health would drastically reduce the numbers of school shootings in the USA.

But we won't do that, because why spend money when you can earn money instead?

Capitalism is the bane of a just democratic society where we pool resources to help each other out so that everybody gets a fair chance and a good life.

MehBlah@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

I worked for a mental health system for seven years. The cause of the decline in the mental health system can be traced directly back to Reagan. They want to pray the demons away but most of all they don't want their victims to realize who is really to blame for their pain.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 4d

Most people are not intelligent and will do as they're told. They're still an army of dangerous morons capable of committing war crimes.

Jaysyn@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 4d
Sordid_Seraphim@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Single handedly made leather jackets feel infinitely lamer.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

he should just go full gold jacket.

kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 15 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Shockingly the CEO of the company that would benefit from regulatory capture of AI says that, and the CEO of the company that would suffer from regulatory capture of AI says this. What a shock...

massacre@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 4d

Man who sells shovels very concerned about digging regulations and notes that digging a hole to the center of the earth unlikely to kill all humans by 2030.

bigbangdangler@reddthat.com · 13 pts · 3d

The time to trust what anyone with a profit motive says is long over.

sundray@lemmus.org · 13 pts · 4d (1 reply)
nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 3d

It’s likely a tool they want to use to accelerate it though.

Although there’s a distinct possibility that they are dumb enough to think that ai can really do it all for them.

A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 4d (2 replies)

"Man who has funded scam says scam must continue unabated despite warnings"

Its almost like nvidia has so much imaginary valuation tied up in the whole AI bullshit that they know when it crashes, it could very likely take nvidia with it.

and I, personally, think it will be a good day for nvidia to die as a company. They've been at the forefront of making shit worse for customers for well over a decade now.

boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 4d (1 reply)

and I, personally, think it will be a good day for nvidia to die as a company

Now, I'd agree with you, but that would leave us just two options again. I'd prefer there to be more competition, not less. AMD isn't our friend any more than nvidia, they'll raise prices even more when there's essentially no competition.

A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

with nvidia gone there will absolutely be room for other competitors to rise.

melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 4d (3 replies)

Just another big talking fool, saying unknown things with confidence.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d (2 replies)

"I am great at making money and I can build things, therefore I am also the arbiter of right and wrong and can make decisions on behalf of the rest of humanity"

melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Every single person with too much money thinks that way. It's just weird.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

When you're rich you're surrounded by people who praise you. Propaganda works the same way- you just repeat something continuously and over time whoever hears it will eventually start believing that it is true.

Plus you don't have to be worried about consequences, that's a big part of it.

chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 3d

Shovel and casket maker says there is nothing to worry about. Now help me lift this dead body. Use your legs.

TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 3d

lol the guys entire business model is selling the components that make this bullshit spin. Of course he would say that. His opinion isn’t worth shit.

bw42@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d

Ah yes, the "Legitimate" Lord Neverwinter wants us all to stay and watch the games until the end. There will be a gift for each of us.

matlag@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 4d (1 reply)

That's a crack in the AI-bros alliance.

On one side, AI companies running out of cash for their expansion race and looking for excuses to pause everything but more importantly everyone else with them.

On the other side, the only corp that actually sells something, invested shitload of money in the AI hype and needs making profit on hardware at an insane rates to recoup his investments otherwise he's toast.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

they want to pause to give them time to regroup so they can peddle the AI shtick as surveillance tech to governments.

stoly@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 4d

He personally makes more money this way, so this is not a surprise.

Spiregarden@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 4d (1 reply)

His denial actually makes the warnings more credible. For a while I was worried why they'd all agree.

crispbacon99@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 4d

Large language models have plateaued is something they won't admit plus they wanna do the regulations while the Israeli controlled us government is still in power

hendrik@palaver.p3x.de · 7 pts · 4d (4 replies)

I seriously doubt it as well. Chances AI destroys humanity within the next 3 years and 3 months should be close to zero. The conclusion, though! Why would we do that if it destroys us for example by 2034?!??

PonyOfWar@pawb.social · 19 pts · 4d (3 replies)

OpenAI/Anthropic want regulation to make sure they dominate the market and prevent any competition. Nvidia wants no regulation so they can sell as many GPUs as possible and keep driving the prices up. That's pretty much all there is to this supposed debate about the dangers of AI.

hendrik@palaver.p3x.de · 4 pts · 4d (2 replies)

Thanks for pointing it out! And seems they're doing a phenomenal job. I currently get like 3 articles each day with someone beating the drums and spreading this exact narrative.

dmir@gehirneimer.de · 5 pts · 4d (1 reply)

I personally believe there's also publicity reasons here: fearmongering has been working so well for so many, so something as ghoulish as AI companies are sure to use it as well.

hendrik@palaver.p3x.de · 3 pts · 4d

Sure. I guess next to what PonyOfWar said, it's also going to attract investor money if people think their product is super powerful, like being able to extinguish an entire civilization. I mean we do know they phrase something like the report on how that "agent swarm" hacked Huggingface to sound like a thriller movie script. I bet that's done deliberately and all about publicity.

Hawanja@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Just watched a majority report video, the gist was the A.I. companies want regulations to prevent other companies (like say from China) competing in the US, so they're spreading this b.s. alarmist drivel about how we're 6 months away from skynet.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

they want people in the us using free models.

SwooshBakery624@programming.dev · 7 pts · 4d

NVIDIA recently acquired HuggingFace for a huge sum. It makes perfect sense that Huang would say something like that.

Cheebus@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 3d

I just wanted to play fucking video games, not fund eugenics

Jensen, take your stupid fucking jacket, shove it up your ass

DonkeyStar@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 4d

Jensen Huang should be forced to wear a polo shirt whenever he does this shit. I genuinely think he’d stop.

Kolanaki@pawb.social · 5 pts · 4d (1 reply)

0% chance by 2030.

But a 100% chance by 2031.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d

Planned obsolescence.

Of humanity.

GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 4d

Huang, Pictured here trying to suck his own dick, says 'Buy more of my product. I'll never get off until I destroy the world.'

cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 3d

luigi really was onto something

sanguinepar@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 4d

Wow, so good to have a guarantee of at least 4 years... 🙄

fartographer@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 4d (3 replies)

That'll show us!

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d (2 replies)

If we are all going down with the ship, I will make damn fucking sure to get the fucks who did this through their narcissism and psychopathy and greed GOOD before we go.

fartographer@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d (1 reply)

I'm struggling to understand what your comment is saying, but I enjoy the vivacity. Should the ship sink, I'll eagerly await your demonstration.

Pre-posting edit: I think I'm starting to get what you're saying, but I'm still pretty confused. I imagine this is more my own deficiency than yours.

anarchy79@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 3d

Hey I'm sorry, sometimes I get carried away. I'm just feeling like that, we can't let them get away with this shit. If we have nothing left to lose, then I'll put every effort into making sure that they also lose something on the way out.

Is that too dramatic? I don't mean it like that, that's just my emotions speaking for me, right?

melfie@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 3d

“As fast as we can” isn’t as fast as it was a year or two ago. Looking at LLM benchmark scores over time, it appears exponential gains stopped as of mid-2025 and now it’s just small, incremental gains. OpenAI and Anthropic are aware of this, which is why they want regulations to kneecap competition, but it seems Jensen didn’t get the memo.

Or maybe he did, and that’s why he bought Huggingface. Now that the frontier is crawling along, open models are rapidly catching up and he doesn’t care whether people are using open or closed models, so long as they’re running on Nvidia hardware.

Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 3d (1 reply)

Remember that Edison would kill animals with ac current to teach the dangers of ac current...

So he could sell DC current...

Just saying... people can be turned against anything for dumb reasons.

Asidonhopo@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1d
[ removed ]
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 3d

Just like economists...every AI guru has a different opinion.

nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Did this dildo realize that 2030 is only just over 3 years away?

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

he realizes he need to buy his diamond, and gold jackets later.

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 3d (3 replies)

AI doomerism is designed to distract us on genAI's real problems.

crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub · 0 pts · 3d (2 replies)

Ur a bot

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d (1 reply)

No U!

altphoto@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 3d

Completely agree except for this important fact...

DarkFuture@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

"Greedy Fuck Continues Being Greedy"

Avicenna@programming.dev · 3 pts · 3d

I guess he missed the memo about this being a PR attempt

kingkong@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 4d

more ai slop and hallucinations. he just wants more circular financing no we need to just make nvda and ai datacenters go bankrupt. no tax subsidies no contracts for them we need to get trump out of office first. make them pay taxes on ai datacenters and subsidize locals for tolerating their datacenters.

at this point nvda is producing NEGATIVE value. almost all ai datacenters are now producing negative value while stealing resources tax and making lives of all worse not better.

more censorship ai bots used to filter real users banning them for their elites that go against their narrative have 1 intern manually un banning people better to make new accounts or leave completely wasting our time and energy and more spam by ai slop that is allowed because they paid the website to spam agendas. all ai is being used is fraud waste abuse. notice meta using ai to generare 15 billion in scam fraud ads last quarter with no penalty.

Smaile@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 4d

He's right cuz the market will crash before then

lechekaflan@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d

操你妈!你瞎了吗?Motherfucker.

roboflop@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 3d (1 reply)

I feel like both positions are wrong (and obvious attempts to either make this product more impressive than it currently is or avoid meaningful regulations). There is not currently evidence that LLMs pose such an existential threat to humanity, but that's not to say there won't be.

A much bigger threat as it stands is these companies having such terribly safety processes that their technology keeps acting in unexpected ways. These are not companies that should have a financial stake in energy infrastructure, not to mention the further consolidation of power by these douchebag billionaires.

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 3d

Nuclear weapons -- and probably some other things i dont even know about -- pose an existential threat to humanity. AI is simply the newest popular technology, every time that happens there's a threat of evil people using it for evil means.

jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 3d

Oh no! He has accidentally produced AI != God sentiment

Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 4d (1 reply)

Hey, Jensen... Relax with all that security. There's zero chance anyone will assassinate you before 2030. You can go wherever you like without security.

Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d

he will probably pass away buried under the unusused ai chips he cant sell in the future.

RattlerSix@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d

W...w...wh...what about after 2030?

moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com · 2 pts · 4d

So long as one asshole with power takes this route, we're all doomed.

We were lucky that nuclear weapons had more of a barrier to entry than AI. I guess it was just a matter of time before we'd develop a new tech capable of destroying our whole species, which was more accessible

rounding_error@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d (1 reply)

It's hilarious how both AI companies and Nvidia are both going each other's way in "AI progress" when really it's all about their bottom lines.

postmateDumbass@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d

They have do say that to maximize shareholder value, aa legally required of a publicly traded company.

altphoto@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 3d

We just won't have a job.

UsernamesAreForSuckers@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 4d

Gee, I’m sure he has a completely unbiased opinion here. In other news, rapists don’t think roofies are a problem.

humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 3d

as fast as we can

This does let him sell the most gpus. Must be coincidence.

There are many issues with too fast.

  1. financial crisis from overspending. There is myth that there is GPU capacity shortage. A recent model, Jev, is a low compute cheaper way to do classification

  2. continued scarcity of useful products/ram

  3. end result of government bailing them all out with compute for military and surveillance

  4. ...

  5. Profit from end of world.

Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 3d

I also don’t think it will destroy the world by then but probably for different reasons.

01189998819991197253@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 1h

And in other shocking news, capitalist megacorp says their product, DeathForSure, will definitely not cause death immediately and should absolutely be purchased with haste. Tonight at 2300.

Zerush@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 3d (6 replies)

Chinas T800 bot 18 September in San Francisco vs human fighter

https://youtube.com/shorts/J1OVezavKwc

Ad4mWayn3@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 3d

we should get a bunch of unnarmed tech billionaires inside there

vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 3d

Not what you wanna see

ramenshaman@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 3d (2 replies)

I make robots for a living (yes I've worked with humanoids) and that is absolutely fake.

Zerush@lemmy.ml · 0 pts · 2d (1 reply)

Sadly not. In this fight the T800 was drived by an human with VR because security, but in fights with other bots it use the own AI. The T800 is also used by the Chinese Police among with another one with the form of a ball.

Chinese bot industry is really scary

ramenshaman@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d

110% false. I would list all of the reasons why I know this but since I'm on mobile and I don't want to type that many paragraphs, and because you're probably the only person who will read this and you'll probably refuse to admit that you're wrong, I'll only list a couple.

  • Regardless of how a human would be controlling the robot, the human would have no way of getting feedback of how the robot is balancing. That ridiculous kick that pushes the dude into the wall (humanoid robots can't kick that hard yet) would absolutely cause the robot to lose it's balance and fall over.
  • Have you seen the Unitree humanoid robots? They look like toys compared to this. They weigh 77 lbs, they fall over all the time, their walking is clunky. Not saying it's a bad robot, it is impressive in it's own way, especially for the price. If this T800 robot was real we would be seeing them all over YouTube, China would be shoving them in everyone's face.
  • That little hop/stretch the robot does just before the fight starts is very obviously fake. Look at it again.
Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d

Okay to be fair that guy sucks at fighting lol

mrsilkworm@piefed.social · 1 pts · 4d

Jensen be like

Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 3d

I agree with him, im not saying everything is gonna be peachy keen but if we start a third world war, it'll just be our fault. We already had two world wars last century without any help from ai. Ultimately, the problem with ai is the flawed nature of human beings, just like every technology that came before it and every technology that will come after.

CovfefeKills@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 4d

So many anti-vaxx tier stupid people around here. Be better