by Adam Hillman

130 points · 13 comments · view on lemmy.world

13 Comments

Letstakealook@lemm.ee · 24 pts · 1y (1 reply)

I think there may be a physical aspect to this piece that is lost without the ability to move in relation to it, without shots from multiple angles, or a video.

ritos@startrek.website · 4 pts · 1y

I agree; I've noticed that with art like this a big part of the experience is being able to take in a lot of different angles and decide how to view it. I never thought Jackson Pollock paintings were interesting in photos, but when I got to see one in person the texture and depth from different angles made it a totally different experience.

clickyello@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 1y (4 replies)

is this loss?

ramble81@lemm.ee · 6 pts · 1y

You assholes have me trained to look for that in any square picture with lines now!

zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com · 2 pts · 1y

It's dignity

ICastFist@programming.dev · 2 pts · 1y

I guess? If you squint just right

NerdyPopRocks@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

It… might be

Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 1y (2 replies)

I never really understand art like this. It's unique, and interesting, and fun to look at, but it's really not that special unless I'm missing something.

It's just random shapes, and a unique set up. Like cutting the apples and fruit in certain ways.

Just seems like a lot of work for something to look at for 3 seconds since there's nothing else to it.

CaptSatelliteJack@lemy.lol · 7 pts · 1y

Not all art needs to be a meta-commentary on the duality of man. Sometimes art can just be cool shapes.

BradleyUffner@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1y

It's probably better in 3d

Paradachshund@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 1y

What am I looking at. Coffee with foam?

tyler@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y

Kotlin

blusterydayve26@midwest.social · 1 pts · 1y

The Pac Men rise!