I was gonna argue for the left side as each child can be seen as the root of its own tree. But your logic is flawless, it's clearly the correct answer.
I've legit seen somebody wearing JNCOs within the last couple months. I think some people are trying to bring them back into style, and while I still won't wear them, I'd love to see them come back, anyway.
Honestly, I wanna see a lot of late 90s/early 00s fashion come back. I miss some of those looks.
21 Comments
lemmyng@lemmy.ca · 28 pts · 1y
The one on the right, but each branch wears its own pants like a JNCO Matryoshka doll.
HereIAm@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
I was gonna argue for the left side as each child can be seen as the root of its own tree. But your logic is flawless, it's clearly the correct answer.
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 1y
This is adorable and I love it
zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev · 19 pts · 1y
JNCOs are back in!
Chozo@fedia.io · 7 pts · 1y
I've legit seen somebody wearing JNCOs within the last couple months. I think some people are trying to bring them back into style, and while I still won't wear them, I'd love to see them come back, anyway.
Honestly, I wanna see a lot of late 90s/early 00s fashion come back. I miss some of those looks.
v_krishna@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 1y
I don't think they are coming back for those of us who wore them originally but my 16 year old and lots of his friends freaking love them.
prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1y
Just like the 60s came back in the 90s … the 90s are coming back in the 20s
Hint: it’s related to the old clothes people’s parents have in Their closets
Notyou@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 1y
I miss wearing flannels. It might have been more early 90s, but I'm slow to pick up trends.
Linktank@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 1y
I mean, clearly the underwear is worn like the left and the pants like the right.
dingus@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
This is so stupid but I love it
NONE_dc@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Legit question: which requires the less amount of fabric?
zaubentrucker@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 1y
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 1y
It needs a skirt.
Masterkraft0r@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 1y
the right pictures is the equivalent of 31 nodes in a trenchcoat to impersonate a root
yes, fellow root, indeed.
snue@feddit.dk · 3 pts · 1y
I think I like the many individual pants the best ^^
kalpol@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1y
Splay tree gets tangled up pulling a leg out and falls down the stairs
lugal@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 1y
If that's a binary tree, what do non-binary trees look like?
crazybrain@lemmy.spacestation14.com · 9 pts · 1y
Kinda like this:
lugal@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 1y
Each knot has two smaller and one bigger child knot? That's queer
ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 1y
Each branch has however many children, of whichever size, as is required by the application
OpenStars@piefed.social · 1 pts · 1y
Yes or no, we need the answer!
stinky@redlemmy.com · 1 pts · 1y
Whose binary tree? Mine have more than two legs