INAL and even further away from am American one, but I shall inboke the law of Cunningham . Having the company recognising or just generally being okay with the union formation makes the whole process easier. No hiding your unionisation activities and such. I believe the role of the union-buster is to dissuade the employees from signing up to it, see if there's any dirt on union leaders to have then fired, and to just generally be a royal pain in the arse for everyone.
If I got the story right a bunch of Blizzard developers got fired because they shared company secrets/IP in the same discord server they discussed their unionisation work, so Blizzard's lawyers found an easy way to get rid of them.
I do agree it's an odd choice not to fix it, and I do wish they would. But for now it's a risk I'm fine with taking. If my server gets DOSd in the future from multiple unauthenticated streams I sure will be a grumpy git and complain to them, but in the mean time uuh... sharing is caring? 😅
I think you've fundamentally misunderstood some of their communication.
There's the issue I described earlier where it is possible to stream files unauthenticated if you know the folder structure on the video. The devs have responded that they won't fix this. Outside of streaming content, there's no other access through this mean. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/1501
Then there's the release of 10.11.7 that fixed a number of security issues. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/releases/tag/v10.11.7 with no major security issues since then. And all the issues were privilagr escalation for a normal user account on jellyfin. So the attacker would already needed to have an account on your server, and only the data that jellyfin could see was at risk, nothing escaped contagion so to say.
I have no idea where you've got the idea where they themselves claim it's unsecure to open it to the internet. Of course there's always a risk associated with exposing something, but jellyfin doesn't pose any larger risk than anything else you might publish.
That would make sense, but the "+ 1 - 1" both inside the patenethis don't, as he also has the "+ 1" outside. I assume ( making an ass of me along the way) he tried to write the formula you described from memory, but cocked it up a bit.
Good on the three people who wasn't caught, either because the don't use AI or because they at least read the question and the llm output. And gold star if any of them noticed the white text but didn't tell the rest of the students!
I think he was "arguing" (not sure, as there's the added /s) about the pen and paper. Not everyone can use a pen well, there's also accessibility needs for people with severe dyslexia and such.
I don't think it's as complicated as setting up an arr stack (I know it was hyperbole, dw :p). Maybe it's because most of the films I aquire already come with subs, but surely there are plugins that make getting them fairly easy?
I don't think the price of space x shares matter at all to someone who didn't know it released recently. And if they decided they suddenly do care, they could just open the article and read it.
INAL and even further away from am American one, but I shall inboke the law of Cunningham . Having the company recognising or just generally being okay with the union formation makes the whole process easier. No hiding your unionisation activities and such. I believe the role of the union-buster is to dissuade the employees from signing up to it, see if there's any dirt on union leaders to have then fired, and to just generally be a royal pain in the arse for everyone.
If I got the story right a bunch of Blizzard developers got fired because they shared company secrets/IP in the same discord server they discussed their unionisation work, so Blizzard's lawyers found an easy way to get rid of them.
I do agree it's an odd choice not to fix it, and I do wish they would. But for now it's a risk I'm fine with taking. If my server gets DOSd in the future from multiple unauthenticated streams I sure will be a grumpy git and complain to them, but in the mean time uuh... sharing is caring? 😅
I think you've fundamentally misunderstood some of their communication.
There's the issue I described earlier where it is possible to stream files unauthenticated if you know the folder structure on the video. The devs have responded that they won't fix this. Outside of streaming content, there's no other access through this mean. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/1501
Then there's the release of 10.11.7 that fixed a number of security issues. https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/releases/tag/v10.11.7 with no major security issues since then. And all the issues were privilagr escalation for a normal user account on jellyfin. So the attacker would already needed to have an account on your server, and only the data that jellyfin could see was at risk, nothing escaped contagion so to say.
They also officially support a reverse proxy set up: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/post-install/networking/reverse-proxy/.
I have no idea where you've got the idea where they themselves claim it's unsecure to open it to the internet. Of course there's always a risk associated with exposing something, but jellyfin doesn't pose any larger risk than anything else you might publish.
Ah yes, let's just ignore the direct threats of occupation from the commander in chief of the world's largest army.
Do you have any proof that it's not secure?
Is the new mechanic jumping? In which case, yeah, that sure looks like a jump!
You got it all wrong! The wealth tax and billionaires pulling the strings is just a distraction from the Epstein files! /s
Uni-gen? That's my head cannon at least
Unfortunately for a Plex style easy to share library you need it to be centralized, handing over a lot of power to whoever is controlling it.
Why not? Unless you're talking about unauthenticated steaming of media if you reverse engineer a servers folder structure.
That's exactly what someone I shouldn't be trusting would say!
I can see the logic in that 🙂
That would make sense, but the "+ 1 - 1" both inside the patenethis don't, as he also has the "+ 1" outside. I assume ( making an ass of me along the way) he tried to write the formula you described from memory, but cocked it up a bit.
It's like he doesn't realise one of the main reasons people left reddit is exactly because of this type of hidden censorship like shadowbanning.
Good on the three people who wasn't caught, either because the don't use AI or because they at least read the question and the llm output. And gold star if any of them noticed the white text but didn't tell the rest of the students!
I think he was "arguing" (not sure, as there's the added /s) about the pen and paper. Not everyone can use a pen well, there's also accessibility needs for people with severe dyslexia and such.
I don't think it's as complicated as setting up an arr stack (I know it was hyperbole, dw :p). Maybe it's because most of the films I aquire already come with subs, but surely there are plugins that make getting them fairly easy?
Because shops are always full throttle from opening till closing.
Here in the UK it's just plain water that's added.
I don't think the price of space x shares matter at all to someone who didn't know it released recently. And if they decided they suddenly do care, they could just open the article and read it.