Everyone here is probably aware, but still (Also, disroot has a forgejo instance, link in body)

https://git.disroot.org/

235 points · 19 comments · view on lemmy.world

19 Comments

30p87@feddit.org · 12 pts · 1y (11 replies)

How bad is GitLab (selfhosted) in this context?

asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev · 11 pts · 1y (3 replies)

It's developed by an american company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitLab_Inc.

lena@gregtech.eu · 11 pts · 1y (2 replies)

It's open source, open source is global. Doesn't matter where the main dev is from if it's self hosted.

0x0@programming.dev · 10 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Global as the team may be, they'll have to follow laws of the country the company's from.
Self-hosted can ameliorate.

30p87@feddit.org · 6 pts · 1y

Yeah, I just set up Forgejo as base installation, so if GitLab does some bullshit, I can at least easily migrate to it

undone@lemm.ee · 9 pts · 1y (3 replies)
[ removed ]
wewbull@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Forgejo is a hard fork of gitea that occured after the leadership took private control of the logo and branding, started developing proprietary add-ons, and building a business around it.

Forgejo is developed under Codeberg e.v. which is a German non-profit.

I think it's still a drop-in replacement for gitea.

undone@lemm.ee · 5 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
30p87@feddit.org · 2 pts · 1y

Huge parts of the sample config still say "gitea" as parts of names etc.

devfuuu@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y (1 reply)

By what I usually read it's really hard to keep it running since gitlab takes a lot of resources. Go with it if you have the hardware and human resources to maintain it. I used gitlab hosted on premises in a company I worked at some years ago, it was nice, but I was just using it, not the poor infrastructure guy.

30p87@feddit.org · 3 pts · 1y

I already have one, and apart from some clashes with Arch's usual file hierarchy, it was smooth. But I just noticed that dinkleberg.org is ... was available, and I think it would be worth it to set up a forgejo instance, as a comedic pendant to the official codeberg.org instance, and to see which one works better in the end. But at last, once they fully implement federation, I'll switch fully. Arch has a wiki page and a packaged version ready anyway, and it can use my already set up postgres, so just more of a reason to look into it further.

skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl · 4 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
uranibaba@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y (3 replies)

What is disroot.org?

Blaze@feddit.nl · 10 pts · 1y (2 replies)

Disroot is a platform providing online services based on principles of freedom, privacy, federation and decentralization.

They offer email and other services

uranibaba@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y

Nice to see a non big corporate alternative.

lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network · 2 pts · 1y

And they're set in the Netherlands!

houseofleft@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Anyone know of projects getting good traction on codeberg? I reeeeaaally want it to be a success, but github seems to have a bit or a grip on the open source software community which makes anything else have an annoying hurdle for open source projects.

ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 1y

Do you have a good tutorial on how to set up CI/CD on forgejo?

sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 1y

The concentration of open source projects around proprietary services has always bugged me, glad people are making action.

letzlo@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 1y (1 reply)

Do they support some kind of CI/CD? Or is there maybe an external free service that can be recommended? It’s pretty much just for building some docker images or compiling a static site.

skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl · 6 pts · 1y
[ removed ]
ScoreDivision@programming.dev · 1 pts · 1y

Could someone explain disroot & forgejo for me?