c/science_memes · by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world · 1yFor reference 919 points · 15 comments · view on lemmy.world
15 Comments
muhyb@programming.dev · 53 pts · 1y
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml · 37 pts · 1y
henfredemars@infosec.pub · 27 pts · 1y
How do I know it's not two halves of the same fig?
tabris@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Yeah, it should be "fig 1", "also fig 1, but the other half".
zarqie@feddit.nl · 1 pts · 1y
fig 0.5 and fig 1.0
TachyonTele@lemm.ee · 4 pts · 1y
Because... Science!
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1y
The shape and internal structure are different.
BodilessGaze@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 1y
Do you have a justified true belief they aren't the same fig?
TheGiantKorean@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 1y
Klear@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 1y
Not a lie per se, more of a fib.
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 1y
Hrmf, figures.
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 1y
JayJay@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 1y
Damn, black and white figs look like demons. The paradolia is real.
BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1y
They're both fig 1
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 1y
Damn you.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 1y
Are these sig figs, or just the regular type?
HylicManoeuvre@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 1y
Ceci n'est pas une figue.