Even the right-wing reviewers who hate the premise admit it's a well written film in the vein of heist thrillers.
It's a really good movie. Not particularly useful if you actually want to destroy something - they were careful to get a consultant to make sure they didn't break any laws or create liability for themselves or the studio. If you didn't see it in theatre, you missed out! I'm really glad the feds are wringing their hooves over it, it deserved much better marketing. It is destined to become a cult classic.
It's a good story, and would be extremely bad to follow as a recipe. But it would be a good movie to watch with a very small group of like-minded friends.
The beauty of it is -- the people you go with don't have to be 'like-minded.' You can enjoy Oceans Eleven without endorsing theft, you can enjoy HTBUAP without endorsing sabotage. If your friends feel it crosses a line, that's a very interesting post-film discussion: Why isn't it disturbing for people to root against the 'house' in Oceans? Is it okay to break the law to get rich, but not to do it for justice?
It's a good movie, but like others have noted, this is not how you do it. 90% of blowing up a pipeline is community building, being able to get the gear you need and carry it out with a lot of people knowing and being able to trust that they won't rat you out. But it turns out when you have a community like that, well, you don't need to blow up the pipeline, you can just lobby the government.
Yes, exactly this. The book by Andreas Malm had a review which read like "this book is less how to blow up a pipeline, and more why to blow up a pipeline", and the movie is working on a metaphorical level to argue the case. You're not meant to emulate it directly.
Well, lobbying in the US means "bribing" and if you're just going to talk to them without money in hand they don't give a fuck. Since the film is set in the US, that kind of matters. Lobbying against oil anywhere in the world is basically just ignored. Again, direct action gets the goods.
Wow, I really hope no one writes "How to Blow Up a Fractionating Column With a $20 Drone." Pipelines are pretty easy to mass produce, but attacks on distillation towers like we've seen come out of Ukraine can knock out a refinery for years.
I liked it. Not exactly a "how to" movie but a nice escape fantasy. The East has similar eco terrorism vibes but it tries to focus on too much and misses the mark. HTBUAP is dead on focused on destroying a pipeline and tells that story well.
I enjoyed the movie. I like how it shows concrete ways in which people can be affected by the matter at hand. Not a "polar bears on thin ice" or similar, but actual effects on everyday people (not that polar bears don't matter)
Boy, it sure would be a real shame if people did that sort of thing. Like tragic even.
Hell I might even shed a tear! (If I'm chopping onions when I hear about it)
57 Comments
7eter@feddit.org · 119 pts · 356d
Movie ads are getting smarter these days
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz · 37 pts · 355d
nurunuru@leminal.space · 82 pts · 356d
sounds like it's the movie to see this year :~)
idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works · 41 pts · 355d
The movie is from 2022: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Blow_Up_a_Pipeline_(film)
nurunuru@leminal.space · 14 pts · 355d
yeah...... I looked that up as soon as I commented haha
bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 355d
The audio book is on Spotify too.
Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 355d
Not the same though - the book is non-fiction. Still great though. And no reason not to enjoy them together.
TRock@feddit.dk · 62 pts · 356d
FBI must not be familiar with the Streisand effect
Five@slrpnk.net · 54 pts · 355d
Even the right-wing reviewers who hate the premise admit it's a well written film in the vein of heist thrillers.
It's a really good movie. Not particularly useful if you actually want to destroy something - they were careful to get a consultant to make sure they didn't break any laws or create liability for themselves or the studio. If you didn't see it in theatre, you missed out! I'm really glad the feds are wringing their hooves over it, it deserved much better marketing. It is destined to become a cult classic.
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net · 29 pts · 355d
Related, there's actually a rundown on a bunch of the opsec problems with it: https://anarchist-archive.org/library/en/hakan-geijer-popsec-how-not-to-blow-up-a-pipeline
It's a good story, and would be extremely bad to follow as a recipe. But it would be a good movie to watch with a very small group of like-minded friends.
Five@slrpnk.net · 20 pts · 355d
The beauty of it is -- the people you go with don't have to be 'like-minded.' You can enjoy Oceans Eleven without endorsing theft, you can enjoy HTBUAP without endorsing sabotage. If your friends feel it crosses a line, that's a very interesting post-film discussion: Why isn't it disturbing for people to root against the 'house' in Oceans? Is it okay to break the law to get rich, but not to do it for justice?
Zachariah@lemmy.world · 49 pts · 356d
one reason solar is a great energy source is it’s decentralized
MintyFresh@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 356d
But then a couple dozen bros can't hoard wealth and power. It's like you don't even care about the capitalists. Bruh
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz · 16 pts · 355d
You already had me at decentralized, but now I am fully erect.
far_university1990@reddthat.com · 7 pts · 355d
Came
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 355d
Also, How to blow up a solar panel seems a bit boring, honestly.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 355d
Those giant solar arrays where they focus all the energy up at one tower would be badass to blow up.
Don't do it, we desperately need more of those, but I imagine it would be sparkly.
sga@piefed.social · 1 pts · 355d
Zachariah@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 354d
all power sources have the same problem of centralized sources of materials and manufacturing, so it doesn’t make solar any worse than the others
but the other energy sources have the problem of centralization once they’re implemented
sga@piefed.social · 2 pts · 354d
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 34 pts · 355d
dillekant@slrpnk.net · 15 pts · 355d
It's a good movie, but like others have noted, this is not how you do it. 90% of blowing up a pipeline is community building, being able to get the gear you need and carry it out with a lot of people knowing and being able to trust that they won't rat you out. But it turns out when you have a community like that, well, you don't need to blow up the pipeline, you can just lobby the government.
jerkface@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 355d
I'm sure they're less worried about the "hows" of it all, than just the promotion of the idea in popular thought.
dillekant@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 355d
Yes, exactly this. The book by Andreas Malm had a review which read like "this book is less how to blow up a pipeline, and more why to blow up a pipeline", and the movie is working on a metaphorical level to argue the case. You're not meant to emulate it directly.
explodicle@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 355d
I haven't seen the movie yet; in which country is it set?
dillekant@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 355d
USA.
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 355d
Lobbying is "begging for permission" from people who have been paid to not care. "Direct action gets the goods."
dillekant@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 355d
Lobbying, protest, etc. These are effective. Money matters less than you think*. Often organising gets the job done.
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 354d
Well, lobbying in the US means "bribing" and if you're just going to talk to them without money in hand they don't give a fuck. Since the film is set in the US, that kind of matters. Lobbying against oil anywhere in the world is basically just ignored. Again, direct action gets the goods.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 355d
It's on Hulu or was It's where I watched it not long ago and it was good.
umbrella@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 355d
SirMaple__@lemmy.ca · 32 pts · 355d
Hey FBI....
Wolf@lemmy.today · 7 pts · 354d
Is that Barbie Streisands house?
WrittenInRed@piefed.blahaj.zone · 29 pts · 355d
Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 354d
I would like to thank the federal government for raising awareness that this movie exists. Wouldn't have happened without them.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 354d
the book is also good
buddascrayon@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 355d
The producers of the movie: "Thank you for the free publicity! Now far more people will watch our movie than every would have otherwise."
Scavenger_Solardaddy@lemmy.ml · 9 pts · 355d
The Streisand effect all over again.
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net · 20 pts · 355d
Wow, I really hope no one writes "How to Blow Up a Fractionating Column With a $20 Drone." Pipelines are pretty easy to mass produce, but attacks on distillation towers like we've seen come out of Ukraine can knock out a refinery for years.
PieMePlenty@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 355d
I liked it. Not exactly a "how to" movie but a nice escape fantasy. The East has similar eco terrorism vibes but it tries to focus on too much and misses the mark. HTBUAP is dead on focused on destroying a pipeline and tells that story well.
Valmond@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 355d
So do they destroy the pipeline or merely damage a part of it?
PhoreTwunny@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 355d
Someone please make "How to dismantle the Federalist Society"
hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 355d
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26184
ngdev@lemmy.zip · 17 pts · 355d
and violent video games inspire kids to become murderers
humanspiral@lemmy.ca · 15 pts · 355d
haven't seen it, but trailer very good: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt21440780/
Anyway. explosives. detonator optional. Fire can work.
lemmyknow@lemmy.today · 8 pts · 355d
I enjoyed the movie. I like how it shows concrete ways in which people can be affected by the matter at hand. Not a "polar bears on thin ice" or similar, but actual effects on everyday people (not that polar bears don't matter)
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 355d
I don't say carry sand in your pockets because pocket sand shashasha. Well not just because that. It's because of the OSS Manual of Subtle Sabotage.
ohellidk@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 356d
Oh no, how awful........
Wolf@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 354d
Boy, it sure would be a real shame if people did that sort of thing. Like tragic even. Hell I might even shed a tear! (If I'm chopping onions when I hear about it)
barnaclebutt@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 355d
Have they put it up on a torrent tracker?
shalafi@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 355d
https://thepiratebay.org/description.php?id=68275226
barnaclebutt@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 355d
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 355d
it's available through a lot of libraries through kanopy
lmdnw@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 355d
Hopefully.
Coolkat@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 355d
Great movie btw
kilgore_trout@feddit.it · 6 pts · 354d
It seems that government agencies recommend very good stories with their warnings and bans.
Technotica@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 354d
Should have called it "How to 'Not' blow up a pipeline".
Would probably have fooled the powers that be (stupid).
millie@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 352d
Wouldn't blowing up a pipeline just be like, an ecological disaster? Or is this a pipeline that isn't active yet?
thermal_shock@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 355d
I'm sharing it on soulseek if anyone wants it. Use nicotine++, better client.
commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 355d
cool
macafouchette@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 355d
Maybe don’t bring this book