Yeah seriously, isn't that how you're supposed to roast a marshmallow? Dip it in the flame and then blow it out once it's cooked to your liking. I don't understand why the bird is upset. It's not a proper roasted marshmallow if it doesn't catch on fire.
You're killing me, Smalls! First you take the graham, you stick the chocolate on the graham. Then you roast the 'mallow. When the 'mallows flaming, you stick it on the chocolate. Then cover with the other end. Then you scarf.
Nah man you gotta toast it low and slow until its all goo inside but carmelized on the outside. You dont even need chocolate or graham cracker at that point
IMO You want to let the fire burn down to coals or at least smaller flames. It slows the rate of heating a bit so you can catch it before it lights, and it means you don’t have the flames moving and changing how close your mellow is to the heat source.
22 Comments
Lexam@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 344d
I like them burnt and let them catch on fire.
HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 344d
Some people just like to watch the mallow burn....
prex@aussie.zone · 11 pts · 344d
There are two types of marshmallow roaster inside me...
Psythik@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 344d
Yeah seriously, isn't that how you're supposed to roast a marshmallow? Dip it in the flame and then blow it out once it's cooked to your liking. I don't understand why the bird is upset. It's not a proper roasted marshmallow if it doesn't catch on fire.
Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 344d
Eat the outer layer then roast it again.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 344d
You can argue about slow-toasted or torched.
but true s'more aficionados know, you start with slow-toast to get the center nice and gooey, and then you torch it.
the_artic_one@programming.dev · 11 pts · 344d
This is the way, "reverse-seared".
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 344d
Seal in those juices.
Wolf314159@startrek.website · 1 pts · 344d
Marshmallows are like ogres, you've got to torch and eat the layers bit by bit before you slurp the gooey center.
shalafi@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 344d
When I was a kid we'd roast marshmallows over the stove coils. It just occurred to me that's probably an odd thing for a family to do.
calliope@retrolemmy.com · 3 pts · 344d
I don’t find this odd at all! Just difficult to clean up if it drips on the coil.
Similarly, I have made a decent number of s’mores in the microwave with marshmallow fluff.
Toneswirly@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 344d
Keep changing the marshmallow out until you get lucky
Baggie@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 343d
How did you get the marshmallow on the stick if the stick has branches on the end?
wizbiz@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 342d
Pushed it all the way down from the handle end
Baggie@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 342d
Very possible, seems impractical to get off the stick once it's molten though
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 2 pts · 344d
You're killing me, Smalls! First you take the graham, you stick the chocolate on the graham. Then you roast the 'mallow. When the 'mallows flaming, you stick it on the chocolate. Then cover with the other end. Then you scarf.
Toneswirly@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 344d
Nah man you gotta toast it low and slow until its all goo inside but carmelized on the outside. You dont even need chocolate or graham cracker at that point
PixeIOrange@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 344d
I also want a clock that appears only if i need it :(
Johnny101@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 344d
In that case mine has completely melted and fallen into the fire
hazardous_area@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 344d
IMO You want to let the fire burn down to coals or at least smaller flames. It slows the rate of heating a bit so you can catch it before it lights, and it means you don’t have the flames moving and changing how close your mellow is to the heat source.
Zoomboingding@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 344d
You have to be constantly diligent or you'll fuck it all up completely in moments
WraithGear@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 344d
i like some mallo on my char