As long as the fractions balance each other out, the recipe stays the same, right?

141 points · 11 comments · view on lemmy.world

11 Comments

pdxfed@lemmy.world · 48 pts · 257d (3 replies)

"irregardless" says enough.

Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 257d (1 reply)

The lack of verbs in the same sentence underscores the point.

yannic@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 255d

I wonder how many cobwebs surround their keyboard's comma key.

goondaba@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 257d

While I agree, it’s technically been in the dictionary since 1934:

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/07/887649010/regardless-of-what-you-think-irregardless-is-a-word

crank0271@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 257d

The fact that two people found this "helpful." Maybe for judging Moureen's capacity for general good sense.

DredPyr8Roberts@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 257d (1 reply)

Carrots have a lot of moisture, which you did not account for.

baggachipz@sh.itjust.works · 10 pts · 257d

They also didn’t account for their own idiocy

edgemaster72@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 257d (2 replies)

Well there's the problem. You subtracted half a cup of 4 ingredients (coconut, pecans, pineapple, raisins), thus -2 cups total. But then you only put one extra cup of carrots instead of 2 extra cups.

mech@feddit.org · 18 pts · 257d (1 reply)

That's it. The cake texture is inside the missing cup!

edgemaster72@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 257d

I bet they just added the carrots all together instead of in half cup increments for each replaced ingredient individually. You might be able to fool a cake on the content of ingredients you add, but never on the number of steps. Pretty sure I've read that in a cookbook somewhere.

Pat_Riot@lemmy.today · 10 pts · 257d

"try again?" They didn't try a first time. Most cooking allows for a bit of fuckery and experimentation, but baking is like building a model, skipping steps and kit bashing are only for truly advanced builders.