Makes perfect sense

523 points · 24 comments · view on lemmy.world

24 Comments

psx_crab@lemmy.zip · 79 pts · 254d (7 replies)

Which only mean they aren't a frog nor a pig, they're an entirely new species where the male have a frog-like form and female have a pig-like form.

The_v@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 254d

A form of sexual dimorphism. Honestly compared to real examples like the angler fish it's not even that weird.

Deceptichum@quokk.au · 33 pts · 254d (4 replies)
[ removed ]
tetris11@lemmy.ml · 18 pts · 254d

Or they're all chimeras, but the frog part is hemizygous (so has to express the gene) and the piggie part is X recessive heterozygous (so has another allele that can suppress the gene), and the gene controls which end of chimeric scale (frog to pig) the body tips

jimmux@programming.dev · 14 pts · 254d

I never heard of xenoparity before, this is fascinating.

Supposedly it only evolved about 5 million years ago, and some colonies still rely on external populations? Nature is constantly finding new ways to undermine our attempts to think we know how shit works.

rapchee@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 254d

holy wtf

TexasDrunk@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 254d

First, thank you for pointing this out. I had to go and fill my brain hole with a bunch of information about this absolutely fascinating discovery. I really thought you were discussing some science fiction concept initially.

Second, what in the actual fuck did I just read?!?

affenlehrer@feddit.org · 21 pts · 254d

We could call them sometime like puppets or Muppets

jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works · 60 pts · 254d (8 replies)

First off, Hank Green, it's The Muppet Christmas Carol. Second, it is the best film version of A Christmas Carol hands down. I will die on this hill. Finally, we pretty much kicked any scientific accuracy to the curb, starting with pretending that Gonzo is Charles Dickens.

addie@feddit.uk · 26 pts · 254d (1 reply)

Got the most actual quoted lines from the book of any film version, plus you've got all of Dicken's direct-to-reader moralising delivered by Gonzo. And as well as being very faithful to the book, it is a superb film as well.

Michael Caine excels as Scrooge, too. I wouldn't say that he was better than Alastair Sim was in his version - that's a performance that would take some beating - but there's not much in it.

AtariDump@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 254d

Got the most actual quoted lines from the book of any film version…

I think you forgot about the Patrick Stewart version.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Christmas_Carol_(1999_film)

This is my favorite without muppets. Which means it’s my second favorite.

halvar@lemy.lol · 9 pts · 254d (4 replies)

and like also frogs totally cant speak

Klear@quokk.au · 15 pts · 254d (3 replies)

You have to lick them first.

halvar@lemy.lol · 9 pts · 254d (2 replies)

the comment i made my own comment for

Klear@quokk.au · 5 pts · 254d (1 reply)

Perfect setup.

halvar@lemy.lol · 5 pts · 254d

aww thank you

GheeButtersnaps@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 253d

I prefer my Dickens to be as dour and melancholy as possible. Which is why I've always liked the George C. Scott version the best myself. Other than sound volume issues with the blaring horns of doom I think it's great. But that's just me.

tankplanker@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 254d (1 reply)

May be they couldn't have kids because, i don't know, being entirely different species, so they adopted.

optissima@lemmy.ml · 17 pts · 254d

Or they're sexually dimorphic. They all do seem to have a single cloacal-like cavity…

Mr_Fish@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 254d (1 reply)

It's like how in the Shrek universe, dragons and donkeys are the same species.

snooggums@piefed.world · 9 pts · 253d

Nope, all the dragon children are sterile cross species offspring like mules.

hperrin@lemmy.ca · 11 pts · 253d

That’s better than those demon dragon-donkey hybrids from Shrek.

fox2263@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 254d

Sometimes this happens with dogs though doesn’t it. Maybe they just took it to the extreme for puppets

TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 254d

Of course it's Hank Green who would question it lol. But you're not the only one!

azi@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 247d

Uh yeah because it's a movie. They couldn't pass up on casting Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy as Bob and Emily Cratchet (what with Miss Piggy's sheer talent and star power) which left them in a bit of a casting bind. Realistically they had to cast pigs and frogs as the Cratchet children instead of searching high and low for talented half-pig half-frog child actors. Even then they went out of their way in casting Kermit's actual nephew Robin the Frog as Tiny Tim and the other child actors (Peter, Miranda, and Melinda) pretty closely resembled their 'parents'.