rule

463 points · 24 comments · view on lemmy.world

24 Comments

Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world · 126 pts · 243d (3 replies)

This sounds very fast and efficient.

kopasz7@sh.itjust.works · 102 pts · 243d (2 replies)

Very private, much stable.

kotauskas@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 26 pts · 242d

tbf it could be alright privacy-wise if you use encrypted swap

abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 24 pts · 242d

The design is very human.

groet@feddit.org · 65 pts · 242d (6 replies)

I keep all my swap on a ramdisk its much faster than disk IO. /s

Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de · 35 pts · 242d (4 replies)

That's pretty much zram

groet@feddit.org · 20 pts · 242d

TIL: and its actually useful due to compression.

AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 242d

Looked this up, turned on zswap on my cheap laptop and now it's so much more usable, thanks

kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 242d

Wow, someone finally let us download more ram in linux

sludgewife@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 241d

at work i made a rpm to set up zswap on our rhel 7 (ughhhh) workstations and the description was "download more ram!"

ragas@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 242d

You kid, but this is actually true.

fossilesque@mander.xyz · 54 pts · 243d
[ removed ]
Jankatarch@lemmy.world · 51 pts · 242d

Some google data center out there is questioning what the actual fuck.

Ephera@lemmy.ml · 38 pts · 242d (1 reply)

Reminds me of pingfs, which stores data in in-flight ICMP packages: https://code.kryo.se/pingfs/

Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 24 pts · 242d

I love how absurd pingfs is. It's also one of the few cases where network congestion actually improves capacity.

cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 30 pts · 242d (3 replies)

put all your swap on google drive so google chrome can use it all

Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 242d (2 replies)

Stop, I can only get so erect.

Spider89@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 242d (1 reply)

msage@programming.dev · 2 pts · 242d

The famous 16 words...

horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · 10 pts · 242d (4 replies)

As the speed of your internet connection increases, there will be a point where disk I/O becomes the limiting factor. At this point you'll want to rent a VM with a decent amount of RAM and use tmpfs to host your local machine's swap space in memory.

anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 8 pts · 242d (3 replies)

While bandwidth will increase, latency won't.
Data centers would be constrained by an unchanging constant of physics, the speed of light. A modern consumer ssd taking 20us to load a page can't be outperformed by a server more than 3km away for swapping (random access, latency sensitive) workloads.
If you want to outsource your stuff to a server, either just do persistent storage or go all the way and send your keystrokes and receive back video.

horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 241d (2 replies)

It's a joke, just like the original post.

spujb@lemmy.cafe · 5 pts · 241d (1 reply)

jokes of this type are fun to disect and no single party gets a monopoly on the fun

horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 241d

I just got the impression that the respondent missed that point.

Fleur_@aussie.zone · 9 pts · 242d

We're reaching levels of based that shouldn't even be possible