publication maxxing

319 points · 28 comments · view on lemmy.world

28 Comments

LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 127 pts · 234d (8 replies)

What about, y'know, doing the actual research you're supposed to be writing about?

Lumidaub@feddit.org · 68 pts · 234d (1 reply)

Just ask chatgpt to do that.

BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 39 pts · 234d

And why write 4000 words that makes sense every day when the LLM can hallucinate 120 papers every day.

MarriedCavelady50@lemmy.ml · 41 pts · 234d
[ removed ]
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 233d (4 replies)

Could be a mathmatician writing about numbers and such.

NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml · 16 pts · 233d (3 replies)

We still do research and have lots of work to do before a paper even begins lol

a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 233d (2 replies)

Like, on your favorite number?

NewOldGuard@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 233d (1 reply)

Lmaoo, I see your name now you’re funny

a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 233d

Lol.

socsa@piefed.social · 67 pts · 233d (5 replies)

At my peak, I easily posted a million words a year to Reddit. The idea that I wasn't putting that effort into actual productive writing is definitely an idea I've had many, many times.

discocactus@lemmy.world · 55 pts · 233d

It was productive, just not for you. The LLM trainers are happy for all that VC money you helped them get.

fossilesque@mander.xyz · 41 pts · 233d (3 replies)
[ removed ]
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 233d (1 reply)

Yeah, what ever happened between you two, anyway? You guys used to be so lovey dovey!

fossilesque@mander.xyz · 9 pts · 233d
[ removed ]
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 233d
[ removed ]
Sergio@piefed.social · 67 pts · 233d (1 reply)

I wish I knew this when I was starting out:

  • write grant proposals instead of articles
  • use the winning grants to support grad students
  • get the grad students to do the research and writing which motivate new grant proposals
  • keep writing grant proposals until the entire world is either your grad students, or people funding your research
100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it · 15 pts · 233d

Ego the Living Planet, but it's just academia

reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net · 41 pts · 233d

Love it when people publish just to publish, really improves the whole academic enterprise!

user1234@lemmynsfw.com · 23 pts · 233d

This seems like it should be in the LinkedInLunatics community.

bhamlin@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 233d (1 reply)

Bonus points if you take all those words you wrote, sort them alphabetically, and publish them as ~3k word works. Challenge the STEM community to reconstruct your original papers.

tburkhol@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 233d

Fun fact: Hooke's law (f= kx for springs) was originally published as an anagram - all the letters in alphabetical order. Latin, of course.

https://spark.iop.org/puzzle-hookes-law

boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 18 pts · 233d (1 reply)

4000 words? That's only like 40 minutes a day at 100 wpm, a speed anyone writing professionally should easily be able to maintain. Spend half the workday writing. 24000 words a day. 6 times the articles. Thank me later.

sukhmel@programming.dev · 15 pts · 233d

Ah, a man of culture management, I see

jol@discuss.tchncs.de · 15 pts · 233d

This is like the myth of the 10x AI developer. Even if I could code 10x faster, coding is only maybe 25% of what I do at best.

dugmeup@lemmynsfw.com · 15 pts · 234d

Lol someone is equating writing the next twilight saga to research, which requires (checks notes) ... research

tomiant@piefed.social · 12 pts · 233d (1 reply)

/insanelinkedinposts

slappyfuck@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 233d

That’s exactly what I thought this was at first. Reminds me of an old video, maybe TikTok, where some guy is like “ok get two fast food jobs and live in your car. Work 80 hours a week. Buy a duplex and then rent it out.”

ornery_chemist@mander.xyz · 10 pts · 233d (3 replies)

I know of a manager who unironically believes this for internal corporate technical reports (ours are academic style and more rigorous and formal than they need be...). It's not quite to this extent, but I've overheard conversations where the manager apparently can't fathom why their subordinates are incapable of double digits over a year.

fossilesque@mander.xyz · 12 pts · 233d (2 replies)
[ removed ]
deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz · 10 pts · 233d (1 reply)

Liberal mem- bers of the credentialed classes love to use the word empower when they talk about “people,” but the use of that verb objecti- fies the recipients of their help while implying that the people have no access to power without them.

I'm loving just the introduction.

fossilesque@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 233d
[ removed ]
Zerush@lemmy.ml · 5 pts · 233d (1 reply)

I remeber something about monkeys and typewriters 🤔

fossilesque@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 233d
[ removed ]
Skullgrid@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 233d

Was even Paul Erdös that productive?

amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 234d

Easy there Mr. Hubbard!