BirdyChat Becomes Europe’s First WhatsApp-Interoperable Chat App

https://www.birdy.chat/blog/first-to-interoperate-with-whatsapp

125 points · 19 comments · view on lemmy.world

19 Comments

in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social · 54 pts · 198d (2 replies)

I don't see any source code, also can anyone confirm if it's E2E and if it routes through meta servers? A statement from Meta doesn't give me any confidence in it's validity until there's open source.

bdonvr@thelemmy.club · 25 pts · 197d (1 reply)

It's also important to know that E2E is a great step, but having Meta knowing who you talk to and how often is still bad.

And as long as Meta has control over the frontend that receives the messages, they could compromise your "E2E encrypted" messages at any time.

But hey it's a step in the right direction.

in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social · 3 pts · 197d

Yes routing through Meta servers is a big problem as they often collaborate with US intelligence.

huppakee@piefed.social · 36 pts · 198d (2 replies)

WhatsApp introduced Third-Party Chats in Europe earlier this year. BirdyChat connects through this official DMA interface and does not use any workarounds. All communication between BirdyChat and WhatsApp users is end-to-end encrypted.

Nice

Bababasti@feddit.org · 11 pts · 197d (1 reply)

I mean, yeah, but WhatsApp probably didn’t do this out of generosity but because regulations forced them to, so it’s actually: Nice

huppakee@piefed.social · 5 pts · 197d

Yeah my view of meta isn't changed the slightest by this. The Dutch court ruled against Facebook last year and they had to make a change 'before the end of the year' to avoid being fined, they rolled out the update with the fix literally the last hour before midnight december 31st. If they can profit, they will. If the fine was low enough, they might just as well have decided to just (continue to) break the law and pay the fines.

pasdechance@jlai.lu · 31 pts · 197d (1 reply)

No thanks. Not gonna use that.

Terms and Conditions contains minor typos. Sounds like it creates shadow profiles or collects info of non-BirdyChat users, data is still being sent to WhatsApp. On Android the CHECK_LICENSE permission is used, so you need to have an active Google account on your device. I don't use any alternative ROMs, but I don't have a Google account. Usually, that means I won't be able to use the application.

Anekdoteles@feddit.org · 12 pts · 197d

This whole thing is nothing more than malicious compliance by Meta anyways. If BirdyChat was an honest competition, they would just buy it.

homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 198d (5 replies)

What’s the one that has nothing to do with WhatsApp

LowtierComputer@feddit.org · 12 pts · 197d

Signal?

freeman@feddit.org · 4 pts · 197d

Beeper?

ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org · 3 pts · 197d (1 reply)

Threema?

birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 196d

Wired?

ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 197d

ICQ?

copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 197d (1 reply)

One problem is that WhatsApp users need to opt-in to communicate with BirdyChat: https://i.imgur.com/0gKY76z.png

Kissaki@feddit.org · 3 pts · 196d

That smells illegal. That's not interoperability as intended.

Malicious compliance. Another round of demands, lawsuits, and pressuring with fines, I guess.

Since WhatsApp is releasing interoperability as part of a gradual rollout, availability may differ slightly from country to country.

Let's hope the opt-in is an intermediate state and part of a gradual rollout.

Damarus@feddit.org · 5 pts · 198d

Is it good? How do you get in?

v3r4@lemmy.org · 1 pts · 197d

I really hope you aren't spending tax money on this shit

TechieDamien@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 197d

Mautrix side eyeing the article