cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42211261
Nato chief says continent cannot afford to replace American security umbrella
WTF Mark!
https://www.ft.com/content/e2f6cd48-2f89-4b75-9aae-fb9e70e773fd
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42211261
Nato chief says continent cannot afford to replace American security umbrella
WTF Mark!
34 Comments
Denixen@feddit.nu · 40 pts · 209d
Is this even for real? We are not doing it just for fun, it is a necessity forced on us by Trump using the USA security leverage against us to conquer territory.
What the fuck does he want us to do? Just roll over and do what Trump wants? On whose side is he? Because he is not on Europe's side.
huppakee@piefed.social · 14 pts · 208d
He is on Nato's side, which is like 60% US' side and 40% Europe's side. Those numbers could be a bit off considering Nato didn't have sides until recently.
Denixen@feddit.nu · 7 pts · 208d
That's what I am thinking. NATO is a USA centered alliance for looking after US interests. European interest happened to coincide with theirs for a long time, but clearly the USA is growing increasingly disinterested. Europeans should probably take over most of it, make it a Europe centered alliance.
huppakee@piefed.social · 2 pts · 208d
I was thinking we could keep the name if we focus on the north of the Atlantic, e.g. Greenland. Makes more sense to have loyal Canada as a member :)
Denixen@feddit.nu · 2 pts · 208d
Yeah the Arctic and North Atlantic are important to Europe without a doubt. No name change needed, just Europe taking more initiative, leadership and becoming more central in the organization.
Canada is a natural partner in the Arctic and North Atlantic. So is of course also the USA, but they cannot be trusted: (
mapto@feddit.bg · 2 pts · 208d
The sad part is that Canada is probably in Europe's share in the numbers above.
huppakee@piefed.social · 1 pts · 208d
Yeah it's more like US' side and everybody else's side
AlexLost@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 208d
Yes, that's the angle he's being paid to spin. Don't think it will work, but a mans gotta get paid, ammirite?!
Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 209d
He want Europe to start actually spending on defense so the US isn’t required for NATO to be a threat.
Denixen@feddit.nu · 5 pts · 208d
But he said that it is pointless to try, that it is too expensive to try to defend Europe without the USA. Read the article. He ridiculed the idea of European defence without the USA.
Szewek@sopuli.xyz · 18 pts · 209d
Rutte is a clown
blinfabian@feddit.nl · 6 pts · 208d
and he has been one ever since he was leading my country
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social · 10 pts · 208d
Security from who, jackass?
I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 208d
Russia.
DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social · 0 pts · 207d
Russia isn't the Soviets, and they can't threaten NATO even without America.
That paranoia was reasonable enough before Ukraine put them in a meat grinder and started cranking but Russia's out of Soviet surplus and they're running out of kids to throw away for Putin's ego.
Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca · 8 pts · 209d
Tonight's top story in metaphorical news at 11. The US bent itself in half to suck its own dick and broke it's spine. Doctors were unable to ascertain the nature or extent of the injury as America is both paraplegic and unable to speak because of the cock in its mouth.
The nations top physicians are consulting on what can be done. The nations top philosophers, having already debated what should be done, have released their final report concluding "Why bother".
ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 208d
With this at least, we now know he's working against the EU and is actively supporting Donald Trump, he said as much. I can't stand citizen saboteurs, no matter if they're American or Russian, these cunts wouldn't survive an anti-corruption probe.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club · 6 pts · 208d
It is going to be kind of expensive for the EU to replace the non-expeditionary capabilities of the US military. There are also some parts, like a nuclear umbrella, which are going to need to be worked out.
It isn't impossible, but it is going to be pretty expensive and a lot of it should be built at the supernational level, preferably the EU.
huppakee@piefed.social · 8 pts · 208d
The thing is, it will not likely get any cheaper while it will likely be become more necessary.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club · 8 pts · 208d
Yeah, I agree.
One thing that would help is defining European defense policy. I feel like a lot of countries are spending money without a target for what they should be trying to build.
vane@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 208d
France have enough nuclear weapons to start judgement day so I don't see the point.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club · 1 pts · 208d
Yes, France has it. The question is how it gets used to protect the rest of Europe.
vane@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 208d
You don't use it, that's the point. The moment someone fires one it's end of world situation.
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club · 1 pts · 208d
You don't use it, but you need to be able to use it for the threat to be credible.
blackn1ght@feddit.uk · 4 pts · 208d
His job is to keep NATO together and strong, of course he wants the US to remain a part of it.
skepller@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 209d
gnutrino@programming.dev · 13 pts · 209d
Did no one tell him France has already done this? (And the UK to a lesser extent but we still rely on a US delivery system)
HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club · 3 pts · 208d
The big questions with France's nuclear umbrella are whether France will provide a nuclear guarantee to the rest of Europe, who makes the decision to launch nukes, and who will pay for it.
France has the best military in the EU and would likely form the core of the EU's defense strategy, but it shouldn't hold key competencies in defense.
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net · 1 pts · 208d
Far right will most probably take over power in France very soon. Hoping they will still defend Eastern Europe with their nukes after that makes as much sense as relying on Trump. EU needs a new defense pact what will build up and share their nuclear capability. It will be expensive but Europe can afford it. The problem is no one is planning to do it yet.
Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 209d
Rutte only gave a half answer. He spoke of duplication and cost of building a sovereign defense. He never said what the costs of not doing so were.
mapto@feddit.bg · 3 pts · 208d
Well, Trump keeps showing it and people still seem not to believe it.
FreddiesLantern@leminal.space · 2 pts · 208d
I know the article probably reports him meaning the opposite but the title sure reads like “stop dreaming, start today”.
Can do attitude 👍
xuakzon@lemmings.world · 1 pts · 208d
not totally wrong. personally i look at it as we need to influence the world to understand that colaboration is more beneficial to everyone than confrontation. that doesn't mean to not fight roge and detrimental actions. wip and carrot.
sober_monk@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 208d
Paywall. Here's another article on the same topic, in case anyone else needs it.