António Guterres urges two powers to quickly sign new deal as New Start expires
The UN secretary general, António Guterres, has urged the US and Russia to quickly sign a new nuclear arms control deal, as the existing treaty expired in what he called a “grave moment for international peace and security”.
The last nuclear treaty between the two powers, the New Start agreement, ended on Thursday, formally releasing both Moscow and Washington from a raft of restrictions on their nuclear arsenals and triggering fears of a global arms race.
“For the first time in more than half a century, we face a world without any binding limits on the strategic nuclear arsenals of … the two states that possess the overwhelming majority of the global stockpile of nuclear weapons,” Guterres said in a statement on Wednesday.
14 Comments
CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works · 28 pts · 205d
What's stopping Russia from having just ignored the deal anyway?
breakfastmtn@piefed.ca · 14 pts · 205d
They'd at least be limited by having to hide the fact that they're ignoring the deal. And they realistically wouldn't be able to hide much from US intelligence. I can't imagine avoiding international outrage being a huge motivator for them at this point but they probably don't want the US and Europe being even more motivated to destroy the Russian economy or increasing military support for Ukraine.
jldg89@piefed.social · 8 pts · 205d
As if they cared about international outrage
TheOctonaut@mander.xyz · 8 pts · 205d
What a weirdly specific question. What's stopping America?
CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 205d
Given that Russia is a dictatorship, Putin can do whatever he wants; and because Putin was the ex head of the KGB, he has the best knowledge on how to run large operations in complete secrecy.
Compared to America, the US
hashad better self regulation, and is also pretty bad at keeping secrets.What's stopping America? Self regulation (in the past), and that someone would have blown the whistle if something was going on; so we probably would have heard about it by now.
Thats why I didn't ask why either of them would follow this deal; but specifically why not Russia
suddenlyme@lemmy.zip · 7 pts · 205d
Agree. They don't follow agreements like this
Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz · 9 pts · 205d
I haven't looked into this particular agreement, but historically arms treaties included verification, limited by what both parties would accept for verification. IIRC, since neither country wanted to let foreign inspectors into their ICBM silos, SALT had the US and USSR dismantle ICBMs where satellites could see.
prex@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 205d
They won't follow when its in their interest but if they can't/don't anyway then its better to get a deal so the US doesn't too.
MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 205d
Canadian geese.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 205d
Don't got no money. I genuinely don't think they can afford to build too many new nukes.
SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 205d
they already have 1000x more nukes than they need to burn the Earth.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 11 pts · 205d
We need a new start for New Start!
#ANUSTART
pipi1234@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 204d
Don't they have enough warheads to scorch the whole planet twice already?
What will be worse without this deal?
MutantTailThing@lemmy.world · -8 pts · 205d
Oh look more fear porn. I don’t even give a fuck anymore, blow it all to hell.