c/programmer_humor · by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 161duhn 🥺 https://gts.apicrim.es/@awoo/statuses/01KJ63PQJVH2MH1F87B0K4VW9T 487 points · 20 comments · view on lemmy.world
20 Comments
morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de · 59 pts · 161d
sidelove@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 161d
zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev · 44 pts · 161d
That's legacy code from the 80s. Please update it when you get the chance.
Redjard@reddthat.com · 18 pts · 161d
Luccus@feddit.org · 4 pts · 160d
I will use this to make my code unattractive for AI.
Speiser0@feddit.org · 32 pts · 161d
KISS in unsafe blocks does make sense.
baduhai@sopuli.xyz · 26 pts · 161d
Pregnant ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
blackn1ght@feddit.uk · 31 pts · 161d
I think that's the result of dependency injection.
Laser@feddit.org · 20 pts · 161d
👉👈
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 161d
Ziglin@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 161d
The
unsaferust keyword basically just lets you declare a scope in which some memory checks do not need to pass for the program to compile.tetris11@feddit.uk · 6 pts · 161d
Some people write their entire codebase within those parentheses.
^me.^ ^I'm^ ^talking^ ^about^ ^me^
peoplebeproblems@midwest.social · 8 pts · 161d
Why?
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 7 pts · 161d
They like to live
dangerouslyunsafelyvithigar@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 161d
Also exists in C#, where it allows you to use pointers.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 161d
Nah I know I was just shitposting lol
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 160d
:3 idk should we try the unsafe code?
Jayjader@jlai.lu · 7 pts · 160d
You can use me after
free()all you want, baberiskable@programming.dev · 6 pts · 161d
It would turn into a prince! An unstable prince of undefined behavior.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 161d
Reply hazy, try again.
(eventually something will catch)
Michia66@programming.dev · -2 pts · 161d