sidelove

u/sidelove@lemmy.world
3 posts · 148 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

C'mon, man, at least pour one out for the homies who waited to update and landed in the period where it was live and undisclosed.

on *Crrreeeak* · c/memes · 12 pts · 80d

God, there really is something there with that "problem!" signal that our brains can give off before any conscious dots have been connected. And this is for abstract shit that you'd figure our monkey brains wouldn't give a damn about.

I'm going to copy my original comment:

Not for nothing, but the tendency for people who get along purely by being conventionally attractive to starfish isn't like, a secret. Lack of effort isn't really a gendered thing.

Where I very specifically narrow it down to vapid people who are in it for self-pleasure as opposed to mutual enjoyment.

The acrobatic inception of the idea that we're talking about people reliving trauma instead of just being emotionally checked out like the entire previous thread implied is what I take issue with, it's some legitimately heinous fake ally shit to use that as a non-sequiter argument.

And yes, implying that I or the guy before me continued on through a partner reliving trauma IS nonconsent which IS rape. You can't imply one without implying the other.

Wait, what? How? It compiles down to bare metal without a runtime. People write OSes and program microcontrollers with it. For any arbitrary C program, it's possible to write Rust code such that it compiles down to the same bytecode. Am I missing something?

on Scromit · c/memes · 25 pts · 116d

Raises hand meekly... I do in fact get this if I've been consistent for a long-ass time, not necessarily the dose size, but I swear to god you could replace my pen with ipecac and it would be the same experience. That said, long breaks "reset" it for me.

And while I don't personally know anyone with the same problem, there are thousands of stories both online and IRL for me of "friend of a friend can't smoke weed anymore because of it".

To add on to the points here, hantavirus is lethal in a way that doesn't translate to widespread pandemics easily. Coronavirus is unique in that while it was 5:1 more lethal than similarly transmissible airborn viruses, that was the "Goldilocks zone" for a virus with its lethality and transmissibility to do maximum damage. Lots of excess death, but the average person generally only had a slightly rough go of it. Hantavirus has >30% lethality in many forms, and is extremely likely to burn itself out before any sort of epidemic status.

So ultimately, very unfortunate for those that contract it, but its characteristics put it way below pretty much every other airborn illness in terms of what keeps me up at night.