We won't film you having sex, we will just know that you are having sex, at what time and whether if on the bed or on the kitchen counter. Oh and we can also map the positions you prefer but that is fine.
My sensor is much simpler. If I see emoji in headings or bulleted lists, I assume it's shit. It might be AI slop, or it might just be kids getting overexcited with the little pictures, but both deserve suspicion and scrutiny.
If a bunch of the emoji don't even make sense it can get in the bin.
As an ancient husk of a person, it all looks crack-addled to me. I don't really see how you can parse out headings from emoji because their usage isn't consistent.
I like putting the little pictures in my readmes sometimes. In my biologically generated repositories. Please don't discriminate against neat little pictures you can just put in text 🐑.
I have a project with a bunch of compose files that define the services I self host. I "deploy" the project by sshing into my server and doing "git pull" which means I'm often making changes that don't get tested before committing to source control. As a result I have long chains of commits like:
refactor the sproingy widget
refactor the sproingy widget v2
refactor the sproingy widget working
maybe the sproingy widget works this time?
ok finally found the issue with refactor sproingy widget
fix formatting of sproingy widget
And now I'm wondering if I've been an llm this whole time
This also means modifying your git pull command to pull the correct branch. A small change perhaps, but may be harder than just committing to main lol.
I had a similar problem with GitHub actions, it was hard to test without messing up the main repo history.
Maybe it's just me but most times I try to compile a software project from source, it's gonna take a long time figuring out stuff not mentioned in the readme and I will probably give up in the end.
To be honest, I don't think that changes anything. Once you got the relation Z = 0, O = 1, etc., or whatever symbol you represent "1", "2", etc., you just have to do algebra.
It doesn't comprehend anything. That's the damn point.
Though it WILL "understand" what you did by the algorithms that break down code turning the variable into another token. So all you're really doing is costing yourself more time and money in the slop machine.
I don't participate in the slop machine yo. I'm just a regular human goober, just goofing off. I dunno how effective or not it might be, but feel free to do whatever you want, or don't want, with my code.
Performance Benchmarks (Validated)
yup, 100% totally validated.
It's like when you buy something thats wayy too cheap for what it should be off of Temu and it shows up with a QC and Validation card that they clearly just print on a large sheet and cut down that says QC OK
You can track/identify people in range of a wifi router based on how the wifi signal is disrupted.
I believe that the original people claimed you could ID individual people using their approach, but I suspect that's under ideal conditions and/or with some training against individual people.
It is true when the repo is of consequence. Repos with ~20K stars generally have ~1000 open issues. But I assume even if not bots, people starring this could be trigger happy from AI coding and star everything that is related to vibe coding.
"In the fast-paced world of artificial intelligence, I'm constantly finding new ways to harness the power of technology. One of the most captivating aspects of AI models like GPT is their ability to "hallucinate" – generating completely new ideas and concepts that go beyond mere data processing. This capability underscores AI's potential to create, not just analyze."
First time I am seeing someone sell hallucination as a "feature not a bug"
65 Comments
ns1@feddit.uk · 187 pts · 193d
Genius
GreenKnight23@lemmy.world · 43 pts · 192d
so much brainrot they burned themselves on accident
MNByChoice@midwest.social · 38 pts · 192d
For those wondering, yes, that was a real issue submitted. There are other issues, and they are great.
markz@suppo.fi · 34 pts · 193d
Pure gold
ulterno@programming.dev · 12 pts · 192d
Owner does not plan on getting their brain to function properly
horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de · 108 pts · 192d
That's not how privacy works.
Avicenna@programming.dev · 3 pts · 188d
We won't film you having sex, we will just know that you are having sex, at what time and whether if on the bed or on the kitchen counter. Oh and we can also map the positions you prefer but that is fine.
kadu@scribe.disroot.org · 90 pts · 193d
I have a visceral "AI" sensor that triggers when I see these:
"Rust Implementation (v2)"
"Performance Benchmarks (Validated)"
Human beings don't self-validate explicitly like that. AI loves doing it.
You generate code, there's a bug, you ask for a fix, your AI of choice will always output with:
*** Fix build issue ***
*** End fix ***
and then call it "Version 2 (Validated)".
Sometimes it's more subtle, but you can feel it, it loves adding "confirmed", "working", "validated".
over_clox@lemmy.world · 60 pts · 193d
This comment has been confirmed and validated by an actual human being 👍
FishFace@piefed.social · 58 pts · 193d
My sensor is much simpler. If I see emoji in headings or bulleted lists, I assume it's shit. It might be AI slop, or it might just be kids getting overexcited with the little pictures, but both deserve suspicion and scrutiny.
If a bunch of the emoji don't even make sense it can get in the bin.
eskuero@lemmy.fromshado.ws · 38 pts · 193d
This comment is so true 🚀🚀🚀
Steve@startrek.website · 22 pts · 193d
💪
GreyCat@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 191d
Ahhh idk, I saw a lot of genuine repos do emojis, at least for headings. Even before LLMs.
I like them 'cause with the right amount, it makes a README easier to parse when quickly scrolling over it.
yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip · 5 pts · 191d
My changelog generation tools output emojis because our lives are too short to not use 🚀
FishFace@piefed.social · 2 pts · 191d
As an ancient husk of a person, it all looks crack-addled to me. I don't really see how you can parse out headings from emoji because their usage isn't consistent.
PlexSheep@infosec.pub · 1 pts · 191d
I like putting the little pictures in my readmes sometimes. In my biologically generated repositories. Please don't discriminate against neat little pictures you can just put in text 🐑.
FishFace@piefed.social · 2 pts · 191d
Your whimsy hurts me
MajinBlayze@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 193d
I have a project with a bunch of compose files that define the services I self host. I "deploy" the project by sshing into my server and doing "git pull" which means I'm often making changes that don't get tested before committing to source control. As a result I have long chains of commits like:
And now I'm wondering if I've been an llm this whole time
exu@feditown.com · 13 pts · 192d
Make your changes in a new branch and rebase/squash when you push it to main.
IronKrill@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 192d
This also means modifying your
git pullcommand to pull the correct branch. A small change perhaps, but may be harder than just committing to main lol.I had a similar problem with GitHub actions, it was hard to test without messing up the main repo history.
housedogpartyfavor@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 192d
No the AI would have called it fixed, “production-ready,” committed, and pushed after the first refactor.
yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 191d
Let me introduce you to Ansible
kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 191d
Why not just edit the YAML directly on the server via a command-line text editor or SSHFS and then push from there when it works?
BenjiRenji@feddit.org · 3 pts · 191d
"I'm confident in my solution."
Alarm bells.
Avicenna@programming.dev · 3 pts · 188d
👉: mission acquired
👊: bugs squashed
👍: code validated
👏: congratulations on this exquisite piece of software
✍️: ready to do more!
Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 192d
Also the repo image
DaddleDew@lemmy.world · 55 pts · 193d
I am no programmer and understand almost nothing of the documentation and yet somehow I can tell it's all bullshit.
It reads like a kid making up words in an attempt to sound smart mixed up with the description for a shady Amazon product.
markz@suppo.fi · 28 pts · 193d
I guess it's reading comprehension. Utter bullshit reeks the same regardless of the field.
over_clox@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 193d
That's absolutely awesome!
I'm gonna start referring to this as 'smelling AI slop'
You got the sense to sniff it out, even without programming experience. And that's a damn good sense to have these days 👍
SGforce@lemmy.ca · 42 pts · 193d
All of YC got bamboozled by this slop.
Xylight@lemdro.id · 32 pts · 192d
anyone gonna cop the $1500 hour session for agentic engineering
ohshit604@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 191d
GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 191d
gkaklas@lemmy.zip · 31 pts · 193d
😆
(Turns out it does exist! But it's just a chemical https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melem )
Noja@sopuli.xyz · 33 pts · 193d
Melem/s
dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de · 6 pts · 193d
I think it’s meant to be short for Mega-elements, so millions of elements.
markz@suppo.fi · 4 pts · 193d
Maybe the bot was just being sarcastic
Blackmist@feddit.uk · 30 pts · 192d
Forgot to put "make sure the project compiles" in his .md files. What an amateur.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 193d
I mean well before AI, it was pretty common that a GitHub repo wouldn't compile.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 20 pts · 192d
Maybe it's just me but most times I try to compile a software project from source, it's gonna take a long time figuring out stuff not mentioned in the readme and I will probably give up in the end.
over_clox@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 193d
And this is why I come up with stupid concepts like this, coding without numbers, just to fuck up artificial intelligence...
https://lemmy.world/post/43158470
Sorry I said it was Friday, it was actually Sunday 🤦♂️
flango@lemmy.eco.br · 10 pts · 193d
To be honest, I don't think that changes anything. Once you got the relation Z = 0, O = 1, etc., or whatever symbol you represent "1", "2", etc., you just have to do algebra.
over_clox@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 193d
Also, how is AI gonna interpret such code without running it first?
Its kinda easy for human eyes to see what I did, but how is AI gonna comprehend what letter equals what number?
LurkingLuddite@piefed.social · 4 pts · 193d
It doesn't comprehend anything. That's the damn point.
Though it WILL "understand" what you did by the algorithms that break down code turning the variable into another token. So all you're really doing is costing yourself more time and money in the slop machine.
over_clox@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 193d
I don't participate in the slop machine yo. I'm just a regular human goober, just goofing off. I dunno how effective or not it might be, but feel free to do whatever you want, or don't want, with my code.
Here's an update...
https://lemmy.world/post/43646761
over_clox@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 193d
Exactly. But it totally throws off AI..
I've got a more extended version I'm still casually working on when I get bored, which includes ELRUIYDAMB
Care to guess what those letters mean numerically?
I'll drop a clue, B=Billion
rem26_art@fedia.io · 19 pts · 193d
Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz · 10 pts · 193d
Oh the fancy ones are separate bits of paper. Mostly they print a qc check with a tick right onto the packaging
idunnololz@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 192d
It's at 9k stars now
MaggiWuerze@feddit.org · 4 pts · 191d
11k now
ramble81@lemmy.zip · 17 pts · 193d
Everyone’s talking about the different things that give it away and here I am with “WiFi dense human pose…” wtf
jacksilver@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 191d
You can track/identify people in range of a wifi router based on how the wifi signal is disrupted.
I believe that the original people claimed you could ID individual people using their approach, but I suspect that's under ideal conditions and/or with some training against individual people.
fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 17 pts · 192d
My impostor syndrome suddenly vanished :)
Bazell@lemmy.zip · 15 pts · 192d
Apparently, these stars indicate that this is a good joke.
ohshit604@sh.itjust.works · 14 pts · 191d
Dropping this here for shits and grins.
Willdrick@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 181d
Fitting read for the throne, thanks
exu@feditown.com · 13 pts · 193d
"production ready" sure you are
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 pts · 191d
No project legitimately gets that many stars while having so few issues open
Avicenna@programming.dev · 1 pts · 188d
It is true when the repo is of consequence. Repos with ~20K stars generally have ~1000 open issues. But I assume even if not bots, people starring this could be trigger happy from AI coding and star everything that is related to vibe coding.
GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 191d
sylver_dragon@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 193d
AI Slop code base. Did Microsoft go open source?
Avicenna@programming.dev · 4 pts · 189d
"In the fast-paced world of artificial intelligence, I'm constantly finding new ways to harness the power of technology. One of the most captivating aspects of AI models like GPT is their ability to "hallucinate" – generating completely new ideas and concepts that go beyond mere data processing. This capability underscores AI's potential to create, not just analyze."
First time I am seeing someone sell hallucination as a "feature not a bug"
ohshit604@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 191d
Welp, no longer using the work wifi.
markz@suppo.fi · 3 pts · 193d
Amazing
Avicenna@programming.dev · 2 pts · 189d
~24000 stars as of now. Stars might possibly be bots too or techbros on AI overdrive
Fmstrat@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 189d
GitHub could ban a lot of bots of they took a close look at that repo and who starred it. Bet they will. Mmhmm. Yup. Any time now.
ozymandias@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 193d
8k bots like it
irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 191d
15k now