Looks like both died in 2020, when they were 25. Katelyn and Sarah Lothrop. Katelyn was killed in a hit and run. I couldn't find a COD for Sarah, only an obituary.
Sometimes when there’s no CoD given for a young person it’s suicide or overdose. People are more willing to share something like “after a courageous battle with cancer…” and not share something that might be considered tarnishing like an addiction.
That's sad to hear, I think I liked it better when I thought they were fictional characters in my head. But I guess TheStrangerTheDanger was making jokes in a scenario where they probably shouldn't have
Tbf rogue rapist robot is kind of funny in an absurd horrific way. Like as a concept.
But yes some days you're a macho man, and some days you're just a statistic of the out of control mech-on-man.
Yes, it's a disgusting joke, but it's no more possible to rape a dead body than it is to for JD Vance to rape his couch. It's no more possible to rape a dead body than it is to kill a dead body.
As an individual on the Internet that has no idea if your gender, to me you're just a text (which I am to you as well).
Point being, you sound absolutely fucking insufferable, regardless of gender, you sound like a terrible personality to deal with, which is unfortunate. You should strive to be better than what you hate.
Honestly fucking doubt it, have you seen this site? Even then, internalized misogyny and transmisogyny is a thing. I also don't give a shit if they are.
Is this comment meant for another thread...? I don't know what the sweet shit you're referring to. Nowhere here or anywhere have I said anything in support of porn bans.
Is this written with like, the assumption that being anti-misogyny is somehow synonymous with being pro-state? Either you've got the brainrot from all the bots that feed you your own viewpoints all the time, or this is seriously meant for someone else.
Feminists are often anti-porn on the basis of challenging the male gaze and recognition of the inherent coercion within a capitalist system eroding the ability of women to consent... is that what you think you're referring to? I agree with these feminist views, but they in no way directly correlate with something like the anti-porn ban in the UK, exactly because it is obviously puritanical in nature and therefore patriarchal.
You have a very clear and consistent pattern in your responses. I’m not going to dig through your comments again to pull specific examples of where you opposed the porn ban.
My point is your hypocrisy, it’s been consistent from your very first comment in this exchange.
You repeatedly place blame on men for a wide range of issues, while going out of your way to emphasize that you’re not from the United States. Then you pivot into ongoing gender-based talking points, which come across as an attempt to justify what is, frankly, a weak position.
There are more women than men globally, yet you still default to framing men as the problem in nearly every context.
Which brings us back to the core issue: people generally don’t like you.
More importantly, it seems like you intentionally provoke these kinds of exchanges because you enjoy this type of discourse.
Just so you know, I am not one of the downvotes, but I still strongly disagree with your comment and it rubbed me the wrong way.
The asking for directions "to stay away" is a running joke that (I think) originated in "It's always sunny in Philadelphia" and neither in the show, nor at any other point does this running joke make fun of the victims, it specifically makes fun of the hypocrisy of the statements.
The late sex workers are not the butt of the joke and so I strongly believe that your disgust is misplaced.
You're trying to add nuance so this will probably not go over well in this dumpster fire of a comment thread, but you are correct. The butt of the joke is the person asking the questions because they look like a creep/pervert/overly horny.
This is a form of self-deprecating humor on part of the original commenter in the screenshot, but apparently the internet is still where humor goes to die.
The butt of the joke is the person asking the questions because they look like a creap/pervert/overly horny.
Sure, but people explicitly use the excuse of "it was just a joke" to cover for bigotry and to (successfully) move the Overton Window right.
On the internet, it's a coin toss as to whether or not the person posting that was poking fun at themself (or a fictional version of themself) like you say
I already knew you weren't. Could you explain how you think you're in a position to determine if something is misogynistic? Like, you believe that you can tell women they aren't harmed by a thing? Why? What are the consequences of this assertion that diminishes the voice of women?
68 Comments
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 58 pts · 109d
If they were working as a team, I bet that would have been very lucrative for them.
starik@lemmy.zip · 46 pts · 109d
Yes, people probably enjoyed having sex with them.
jballs@sh.itjust.works · 40 pts · 109d
Still do! At least that one guy...
hOrni@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 109d
From this article:
https://bossip.com/1001156/talented-twin-teen-ginger-hoes-popped-for-selling-box-on-the-net/
It would seem it is what they did.
oascany@lemmy.world · 56 pts · 109d
What an insane way to report on any type of news
Tangent5280@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 109d
Right? It's like the ghetto-est ghetto you can imagine progressed to the point of having its own news network without losing it's cultural identity.
Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works · 11 pts · 109d
Yeah, it's pretty gross.
teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 108d
I am impressed at the level of trashiness in every word.
Andonyx@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 108d
I know! I thought the NY Post was rock-bottom for that sort of thing, but it seems like there's a new bottom everyday for something.
tias@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 109d
Apparently it's not too late
Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works · 40 pts · 108d
I actually remember this exact thread, I was calling out all the disgusting losers and got downvoted to hell.
SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 14 pts · 108d
The internet is where intelligence, decency, and nuance go to die. I learned that the hard way.
Malyca@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 108d
Me too, that was a dark day
Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -13 pts · 108d
No matter how yuck it actually is, you were still yucking their yum.
teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 20 pts · 108d
Some yums deserve a good yucking now and then.
Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 0 pts · 108d
Lol yes I didn't say I'd be down voting him
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 108d
What if yucking yums is my yum? Stop yucking my yum-yucking yum!
WillFord27@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d
Funnily enough, so is arresting someone for child pornography!
red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 40 pts · 109d
Looks like both died in 2020, when they were 25. Katelyn and Sarah Lothrop. Katelyn was killed in a hit and run. I couldn't find a COD for Sarah, only an obituary.
RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 108d
Sometimes when there’s no CoD given for a young person it’s suicide or overdose. People are more willing to share something like “after a courageous battle with cancer…” and not share something that might be considered tarnishing like an addiction.
LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 108d
That's sad to hear, I think I liked it better when I thought they were fictional characters in my head. But I guess TheStrangerTheDanger was making jokes in a scenario where they probably shouldn't have
andros_rex@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 109d
HA HA HA NECROPHILIA
samus12345@sh.itjust.works · 23 pts · 108d
sangeteria@lemmy.ml · 22 pts · 108d
Actually quite tragic, RIP 😢
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 12 pts · 109d
"The only thing hotter than a red head is a dead head."
Grateful Dead intensifies
AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 108d
I'm here for it
mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de · 11 pts · 108d
If I'm not mistaken they are both dead. One by OD and be got hit by a car
😃😃😃
BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 107d
the pearl clutchers out in full force today it seems
diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 107d
Pacattack57@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 108d
ivanafterall@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 109d
lol such a messed up joke it makes you wonder if we ever got an answer?
orioler25@lemmy.world · -13 pts · 108d
Wow, that's so funny how that guy made the joke about raping those dead sex workers' bodies. What a mad lad and one of the boys.
This is why people don't like men.
mechoman444@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 108d
No no. This is why people don't like you.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · -7 pts · 108d
Man, it would be really hilarious if someone named "mechoman" got raped by an out of control robot. That would be fucking hilarious.
WillFord27@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 108d
Tbf rogue rapist robot is kind of funny in an absurd horrific way. Like as a concept. But yes some days you're a macho man, and some days you're just a statistic of the out of control mech-on-man.
WoodScientist@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 108d
Like that child molesting robot Dwayne 'the Rock" Johnson built!
pfried@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 107d
Yes, it's a disgusting joke, but it's no more possible to rape a dead body than it is to for JD Vance to rape his couch. It's no more possible to rape a dead body than it is to kill a dead body.
orioler25@lemmy.world · -11 pts · 108d
Why men* don't like me.
hateisreality@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 107d
As an individual on the Internet that has no idea if your gender, to me you're just a text (which I am to you as well).
Point being, you sound absolutely fucking insufferable, regardless of gender, you sound like a terrible personality to deal with, which is unfortunate. You should strive to be better than what you hate.
WillFord27@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 107d
What made them come across as insufferable? Honestly all this defensiveness is pretty disconcerting.
orioler25@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 107d
Good, then stop trying to talk to me, dummy.
mechoman444@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 107d
I'm pretty sure if we took a look at all the people down voting you some of them will be women. (Or any other gender other than men)
orioler25@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 107d
Honestly fucking doubt it, have you seen this site? Even then, internalized misogyny and transmisogyny is a thing. I also don't give a shit if they are.
mechoman444@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 106d
Right. But you do care about other things like them banning step-bro porn in the UK. That is something you're apparently ok with.
So which is it? When they're against something they're good but if they're doing something you don't like they're libs?
You do realize that the same people banning the porn that you dislike are the same people that don't like transgenders either.
orioler25@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 106d
Is this comment meant for another thread...? I don't know what the sweet shit you're referring to. Nowhere here or anywhere have I said anything in support of porn bans.
Is this written with like, the assumption that being anti-misogyny is somehow synonymous with being pro-state? Either you've got the brainrot from all the bots that feed you your own viewpoints all the time, or this is seriously meant for someone else.
Feminists are often anti-porn on the basis of challenging the male gaze and recognition of the inherent coercion within a capitalist system eroding the ability of women to consent... is that what you think you're referring to? I agree with these feminist views, but they in no way directly correlate with something like the anti-porn ban in the UK, exactly because it is obviously puritanical in nature and therefore patriarchal.
mechoman444@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 106d
You have a very clear and consistent pattern in your responses. I’m not going to dig through your comments again to pull specific examples of where you opposed the porn ban.
My point is your hypocrisy, it’s been consistent from your very first comment in this exchange.
You repeatedly place blame on men for a wide range of issues, while going out of your way to emphasize that you’re not from the United States. Then you pivot into ongoing gender-based talking points, which come across as an attempt to justify what is, frankly, a weak position. There are more women than men globally, yet you still default to framing men as the problem in nearly every context.
Which brings us back to the core issue: people generally don’t like you.
More importantly, it seems like you intentionally provoke these kinds of exchanges because you enjoy this type of discourse.
Another user called you insufferable. I agree.
Holyginz@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 108d
Ragebait elsewhere
WillFord27@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 108d
What gross corner of the internet have I found myself in? What is this, 2016?
Holyginz@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 107d
I dont know what corner you are in, but stay isolated over in it.
orioler25@lemmy.world · -8 pts · 108d
Wasn't rage bait tbh, serious disgust I have for men like this and also you.
Holyginz@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 107d
Who gives a shit what you do or don't have disgust for. Go be disgusted somewhere else.
orioler25@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 107d
Make me.
Holyginz@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 107d
I have better things to do
orioler25@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 107d
lol, go do them then loser.
kwarg@mander.xyz · -1 pts · 107d
hahahahahahhahaha +100 Damage
toastus@feddit.org · 4 pts · 107d
Just so you know, I am not one of the downvotes, but I still strongly disagree with your comment and it rubbed me the wrong way.
The asking for directions "to stay away" is a running joke that (I think) originated in "It's always sunny in Philadelphia" and neither in the show, nor at any other point does this running joke make fun of the victims, it specifically makes fun of the hypocrisy of the statements.
The late sex workers are not the butt of the joke and so I strongly believe that your disgust is misplaced.
ZC3rr0r@piefed.ca · 4 pts · 107d
You're trying to add nuance so this will probably not go over well in this dumpster fire of a comment thread, but you are correct. The butt of the joke is the person asking the questions because they look like a creep/pervert/overly horny. This is a form of self-deprecating humor on part of the original commenter in the screenshot, but apparently the internet is still where humor goes to die.
prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 0 pts · 107d
Sure, but people explicitly use the excuse of "it was just a joke" to cover for bigotry and to (successfully) move the Overton Window right.
On the internet, it's a coin toss as to whether or not the person posting that was poking fun at themself (or a fictional version of themself) like you say
BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 107d
This just in: edgy jokes are for conservatives only.
orioler25@lemmy.world · -8 pts · 107d
Cool, are you a woman?
toastus@feddit.org · 2 pts · 107d
Why does it have to matter?
But no, I am not.
orioler25@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 107d
I already knew you weren't. Could you explain how you think you're in a position to determine if something is misogynistic? Like, you believe that you can tell women they aren't harmed by a thing? Why? What are the consequences of this assertion that diminishes the voice of women?
toastus@feddit.org · 4 pts · 107d
I had hoped for an honest conversation.
This is not that.
I am not interested in defending the strawman you made out of my short comment.
orioler25@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 107d
chunes@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 108d
orioler25@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 108d
I'm sure this was very funny in a lonely misogynist sort of way.