Norwegian fish farms polluting fjords with waste likened to ‘raw sewage of millions of people’

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/04/norwegian-fish-farms-polluting-fjords-with-waste-likened-to-raw-sewage-of-millions-of-people

117 points · 17 comments · view on lemmy.world

17 Comments

Kennystillalive@feddit.org · 28 pts · 95d (9 replies)

Meat production causing harm to our enviroment?

HollowedFleshwalker@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 95d
[ removed ]
turdas@suppo.fi · -4 pts · 95d (7 replies)

It's not meat it's fish!

Kennystillalive@feddit.org · 8 pts · 95d (5 replies)

TIL fish is not meat.

turdas@suppo.fi · 2 pts · 95d (3 replies)

It's kinda like how pizza is a vegetable.

In the EU, meat has to come from domestic ungulates, poultry, lagomorphs or wild game, otherwise it's not meat: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319971198_How_meat_is_defined_in_the_European_Union_and_in_Germany

CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 15 pts · 95d (1 reply)

It's traditional. Medieval christians defined fish as "not meat" so they could eat it during fasting (along with finding other creative workarounds, like wrapping meat in dough so the all-seeing, all-knowing entity couldn't see them eating meat (see Herrgottsbescheißerle)

trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 95d

Some of them also came up with creative definitions for "fish", so they could eat a nice roast some humble fish on a Friday or during lent. (A beaver definitely is a fish, just look at it swim around in water all day, also it has a scaly tail, need any more evidence? Now shut up and eat your roast fish.)

P00ptart@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 95d

TIL Germany isn't in the EU.

BryyM@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 95d

You should relearn then: TIL fish is meat

Zacryon@feddit.org · 2 pts · 94d

It's the flesh of a fish, which is an animal. I therefore call it meat.

Hacksaw@lemmy.ca · 17 pts · 95d (2 replies)

I wish the headline was more in line with the actual study. I'm glad at least the conclusion made it into the article:

“The Institute of Marine Research is clear that a significant increase in production in certain fjord systems could increase the risk of eutrophication locally, but that current production is well within nature’s carrying capacity. This provides a basis for strict, site-specific management, but does not document that current operations are destroying the fjords.”

Should be more like "fish farm growth must be strictly managed so that it doesn't endanger the ecology of at risk fjords"

Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 95d (1 reply)

Sounds like a partially-solid (lol) plan chance to set up some aquaculture farms and use some of that poop for plants.

Hacksaw@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 94d

Maybe downstream seaweed farms!

snoons@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 95d

ItS wOrTh It FoR tHe ChEaP sUsHi

trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 94d (3 replies)

Fish do shit in water, more breaking news at 5.

jenesaisquoi@feddit.org · 2 pts · 93d

Water? Never touch the stuff. Fish **** in it.

simomat@feddit.org · 2 pts · 94d (1 reply)

They also copulate in there, you knew?

trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 94d

Yes, it's disgusting, right?