US Supreme Court rejects Virginia's bid to restore congressional map favoring Democrats

https://www.scrippsnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-virginias-bid-to-restore-congressional-map-favoring-democrats

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected Virginia’s bid to restore a congressional map that would have given Democrats a chance to pick up four seats in the closely divided House of Representatives.

The court’s order, issued without any noted dissent, is the latest twist in the nation’s mid-decade redistricting competition. It was kicked off last year by President Donald Trump urging Republican-controlled states to redraw their lines and was supercharged by a recent Supreme Court ruling severely weakening the Voting Rights Act that opened up even more winnable seats for the GOP.

In recent days, the justices have sided with Republicans in Alabama and Louisiana who hope to redo their congressional maps to produce more GOP-leaning seats following the court’s voting rights decision.

But the Virginia situation was different, stemming from a 4-3 ruling by the Virginia Supreme Court that struck down a constitutional amendment that voters narrowly passed just last month.

The Supreme Court typically doesn’t intervene in state court proceedings unless they present an issue of federal law. Virginia Democrats had hoped to persuade the justices that the Virginia court misread federal law and Supreme Court precedent that hold that, even if early voting is underway, an election does not happen until Election Day itself.

24 points · 5 comments · view on lemmy.world

5 Comments

etherphon@piefed.world · 14 pts · 114d (5 replies)
[ removed ]
Taokan@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 114d (1 reply)

Oh, no the Democrats quite intentionally did what the Republicans have done in Texas and 5 or 6 other red states, all coincidentally the same ones that condoned slavery. That was kind of the point. Really the best case scenario would have been the SCOTUS used the opportunity to not only strike down Virginia's map but also all the other newly crafted spaghetti districting going on. But of course, none of that. Just tossed Virginia's while leaving all the red states to do what they want.

etherphon@piefed.world · 0 pts · 114d
[ removed ]
reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 114d (2 replies)

Or was it just a fair map for a change

I’m not sure about the VA ones but several ‘blue’ states incl. california have tried to pass gerrymandered redistricting under the argument that the republicans are doing it so democrats should too to remain competitive. I get it, but it also feels pretty short-sighted in terms of pretending anyone cares about democracy anymore.

Most of these bills aren’t written to be temporary or to revert to fairer districting at a later date or anything like that. To me that would have been a simple way to prevent long term damage to ‘democratic’ processes.

etherphon@piefed.world · 5 pts · 114d (1 reply)
[ removed ]
reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 114d

I’m very suspect that southern states ever had fair election maps ever.

I wouldn’t be surprised at all if this were true

QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 114d

But Texas can keep their map?

CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 114d

It's not the Supreme Court. It's the Supreme "Court"(TM), brought to you by Exxon, fascism and pedophiles.

No law is practiced here. Only power. Deeply misguided power.