DOJ addendum to Trump settlement bars IRS from auditing him and his family
https://abcnews.com/US/doj-addendum-trump-settlement-bars-irs-auditing-family/story?id=133124367
https://abcnews.com/US/doj-addendum-trump-settlement-bars-irs-auditing-family/story?id=133124367
39 Comments
Jimbabwe@lemmy.world · 67 pts · 97d
Ah the corruption cherry on top of the corrupt, shitty sundae
radiofreebc@lemmy.world · 47 pts · 97d
Thteven@lemmy.world · 38 pts · 97d
I'm fuckin tired boss, and like most Americans I'm in no position to effect any real change.
What am I supposed to do as a poor that lives 3000 miles away from where all these decisions are being made? We have protests and marches all the damn time, Trump gets booed and (supposedly) shot at during public events, his stooges get made fools of in congressional hearings, bills get submitted and voted down, and none of it actually leads to anything.
We all know there won't be any justice here for a long time, he's just shitting on top of the pile now.
JasonDJ@lemmy.zip · 35 pts · 97d
We were raised our whole lives told that, contrary to all historic precident, violence solves nothing and peaceful protest is the way.
Meanwhile, MLK wasn't shit without Malcom.
I don't think Malcom X was mentioned at all in my public school career.
Okokimup@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 97d
MLK was effective enough to get assassinated. Violent revolution is statistically not as effective as nonviolent revolution; Americans just don't know what that looks like. Highly recommend the book Blueprint for a Revolution by Srdja Popovic.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 97d
FTFY
0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 97d
Citation required.
Okokimup@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 97d
From BfaR:
Jax@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 96d
Seems like those that use violence as an engine to drive change inevitably see that violence inflicted back upon them.
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 97d
You see I'm not so sure about that. I think after the Civil Rights era the oligarchy changed Society so something like that would not be possible again. And when I say I think that it's more like I know that there has been some reporting on this decades back.
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 97d
Aaron McGruder gave a talk to some university students around 2000 that laid out this exact idea. He didn't sound hopeful that change would happen.
Edit: it seems to have been 2003
FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 97d
Because they're overwhelmed
They have been beaten into apathy
They simply accept that they're going to get fucked
It's not helped by the fact that a huge number of them are stupid and hateful
This is all by design
obelisk_complex@piefed.ca · 13 pts · 97d
🙄
mycodesucks@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 97d
It's the fantasy of people who grew up with too many movies.
"Why don't you just violently overthrow your own government?"
Meanwhile people with any actual knowledge of history or human nature knew this is EXACTLY what was going to happen if fuckface won again. The conditions for violent revolution are not even CLOSE to satisfied in the US, and no amount of trying to break the system is going to get that to happen in the lifetime of anybody currently alive.
Whether you're brimming with hope, or buried under despair, or some kind of non-participating magical thinking idiot whackjob/Russian troll - the only potential way this ends is at a ballot box.
IronBird@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 97d
dont really need violent revolution tbh, just kill the 20 or so rich fucks that fund the overhwhelming majority of "conservative" media and the various political power brokers.
shit, AIPAC? like...6-7 people fund half of all their $, addresses and everything are pretty easy to track down
ThunderQueen@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 97d
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 97d
But we're already past the ballot box, and the Jury box doesn't seem to hold any water. That leaves one more box
PunnyName@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 97d
What can we do? Seriously.
Juniperus@infosec.pub · 7 pts · 97d
I would say fight back economically by forming cooperatives. This guy and his criminal enterprises are stealing massive amounts of wealth from us, which realistically means prices are just going to keep going up and up and up. Not to mention Hormuz being closed with no end in sight. We need people to become more economically self-reliant ASAP.
Let me know if you want more specific ideas about managing cooperatives (or look at my post history).
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 97d
I wholeheartedly endorse your position here.
I as well have spent a good deal of time evangelizing on the need to set up our own sort of companies that do not operate solely on the profit margin in areas where the private sector is not providing a societal need well.
Juniperus@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 97d
Thanks! Glad to find allies.
How would you feel about a worker's cooperative (1share/1vote) with an elected board and president, but also a CEO who gets elected based on a business plan? The CEO would build a management hierarchy to implement the business plan, something that's missing from typical co-ops.
Equity of socialism with the productivity of capitalism, or at least that's the hope.
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 97d
I would actually love to talk about this more when I am able I would love to share some of my ideas and hear yours. I think there's a lot of good possibilities in your ideas sound good I have mine too but am just unable to do by myself.
But basically your last paragraph is my thinking, we're obviously not going to get socialism and industries where we need it, we could do it privately. We obviously need to.
Hupf@feddit.org · 7 pts · 97d
Muskets?
Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca · 9 pts · 97d
Tally ho lads!
JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 97d
Sigh, I don my powdered wig and tripoint hat
figjam@midwest.social · 4 pts · 97d
Things are hard and people who are barely getting by don't want to make their lives worse.
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 97d
Now they got these new things called the rifles, apparently they're more accurate I've been meaning to look into it.
Hupf@feddit.org · 3 pts · 96d
Yeah, but those are also much more regulated. Last I heard, for muskets, certain gun laws don't apply.
teyrnon@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 96d
Sure but hear me out here, this is new things called drones, autonomously controlled you can put explosives on them and run them into shit, maybe we should look into that.
PunnyName@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 96d
Certain SCOTUS housing, to my understanding, is very welcoming of such packages.
go_go_gadget@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 97d
Because we're told we can't expect politicians to serve us. 🤷♂️
Ioughttamow@fedia.io · 29 pts · 97d
But if you have done nothing wrong you have nothing to hide? Isn’t that one of their favorite mantras?
BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 97d
Justice for me, but not for thee
fox2263@lemmy.world · 16 pts · 97d
Ah they wrote it down which means it’s law.
Never mind all those other laws they break.
Archangel1313@lemmy.ca · 10 pts · 97d
So, they just gave him and his family a blank check to commit tax fraud. Cool.
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 97d
If there's another administration later they could pull the rug and go after them for tax fraud. That would however require a whole lot of people to grow a pair.
CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 97d
Well mostly he himself gave it to himself. But yea they (republicans) pretty much just let him.
chaogomu@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 97d
Also included, any business or person with close financial ties to Trump or his family.
Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 97d
A country of oligarchs, not laws.
Abyssian@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 97d
All of this is totally sane and normal and we are definitely not in bizarro world.
bmebenji@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 97d
DOJ: Department of Jerkingoffthepresidentuntilhisdickisrawerthansteaktartareanddeaderthanthedodobird