Aggressive AI scrapers are making it kinda suck to run wikis

https://weirdgloop.org/blog/clankers

Cross posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/66285192

51 points · 7 comments · view on lemmy.world

7 Comments

poVoq@slrpnk.net · 22 pts · 85d

Not only wikis sadly. Anything that has public facing deep links that trigger extensive database operations are being hammered by these bots and few servers can take the load.

thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 85d (1 reply)

We use NGINX’s 444 response A LOT.

In coordination with careful rate-limiting, it’s been a dramatic improvement.

The worst of the bots don’t advertise their User Agent (or worse, attempt to present they’re a normal user making 100s of requests a second) but there’s lots of low hanging fruit.

grrgyle@slrpnk.net · 6 pts · 85d

We use NGINX’s 444 response A LOT.

Hmm interesting. I wasn't aware of this one

Tiresia@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 85d (2 replies)

On the plus side, this isn't a problem with AI, this is a problem with AI companies having more investment money than they know what to do with. The moment the hype fades and they don't want to hemmorage money scraping every wiki on the internet thousands of times per day, this traffic will go back to a far more sane amount.

rasterweb@fedia.io · 3 pts · 83d

So we should make more wikis filled with poison data… got it! ;)

poVoq@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 85d

It will probably go down, but the process itself is kind of unavoidable for training LLMs, so I doubt things will go back to how they were before.

altphoto@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 65d

Maybe we should have 2 factor authentication to read wikis. A person would have to come here and seek a public key from other people. If you can get 2 Public keys by proving you are human, then you get a month of wiki access unless you keep proving you are human or if you prove to be AI then you're totally banned unless you get a public key in real person at the local Walmart or Safeway.