There was a cult in the American sitcom Parks and Rec called the reasonablists. They were named as such because if you disagreed with them, that would make you seem unreasonable. I feel Reform is a similar trap.
The name of Reform has always made me think of this too! You may as well call your party Nice Things. "Do you stand against Nice Things." "See this is why we don't have Nice Things."
Tactical voting, if continued by the left, is going to pull the Overton window strongly leftwards, and will ensure right wing parties have an extremely difficult time getting into power
Unlike the low-stakes infighting nonsense that we often have, this is really important.
Multiple polls have shown that not only is Andy Burnham much more popular than Starmer (big surprise, who isn't?), but that he's more popular than Farage. And that is a big deal, because almost nobody else is.
He's an attractive choice for the left, and he's attractive for Northerners who want change - two camps which Starmer has well and truly lost.
I live in a place where, realistically, the next MP is going to be Labour or Reform. I'm a member of the Green Party, but I'd vote Labour if Burnham was leading it. I wouldn't at the moment.
Not really... but I bet there's quite a lot who'll simply follow the current party line, so if the Labour leader were to steer things leftwards towards the centre (or ideally past it), many of them would follow it.
Starmer stood for Labour leadership on a considerably lefter platform than the vague stuff Burnham's been saying. Burnham as PM isn't going to change Labour's current policies. He might be better at campaigning. When people realise that nothing's going to change, helped by the rightwing press, they'll turn on him too.
I, like most people here (Manchester), voted against having a mayor in the first place. When the Tories made the position anyway, I voted against Andy Burnham.
But he's absolutely won me over. In the time he's been mayor, directly because of his policies, Manchester has improved dramatically.
Starmer promised a lot, but Burnham has actually delivered change already.
It just seems like their time could be better spent dealing with problems instead of infighting. Then maybe the deluded fools who've fallen for the Farage con would wake up.
But that's wishful thinking. I'm old enough and cynical enough to see how little really changes. The rich still get richer with the rest fighting over an ever shrinking slice of the pie while politicians tinker around the edges.
This is getting reported much more than the other by-elections that happened specifically because this one is quite likely to bring about a significant change in the UK's national politics
21 Comments
atro_city@fedia.io · 22 pts · 60d
Gary called it and is hopeful that we might get wealth taxes (video). Let's hope that Labour won't be absolute tits on the issue.
davepleasebehave@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 60d
that would be very popular
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 60d
I bet this headline hits VERY different to anyone who hasn't paid attention for the last couple/few years to know about Reform the party.
Without that context, he kinda sounds like a villain from a 1930s play 😄
milkisklim@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 60d
There was a cult in the American sitcom Parks and Rec called the reasonablists. They were named as such because if you disagreed with them, that would make you seem unreasonable. I feel Reform is a similar trap.
TheUnicornOfPerfidy@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 60d
The name of Reform has always made me think of this too! You may as well call your party Nice Things. "Do you stand against Nice Things." "See this is why we don't have Nice Things."
Monzcarro@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 60d
I heard someone pronounce it RE-form, the way you'd say reformed ham. This is now my preferred pronunciation for the reasons above.
fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 60d
What does RE-FORM stand for anyway?
Is it:
Racists
Economic Fraudsters
Oligarchs
Rapists
Morons
or
Raping
England
For
Oligarch's
Russian
Money
or
Robbing
England's
Future
Over
Rape
Movies
or
Ruining
Earth's
Future
Over
Risky
Money
or other?
DakRalter@thelemmy.club · 1 pts · 60d
I pronounce it Deform Ltd.
FishFace@piefed.social · 6 pts · 60d
Well that's probably better than any alternative.
insubstantialpageant@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 59d
Tactical voting, if continued by the left, is going to pull the Overton window strongly leftwards, and will ensure right wing parties have an extremely difficult time getting into power
llamatron@lemmy.world · -19 pts · 60d
So much mega-important, world changing shit going on and we have this media stoked in-fighting nonsense going on.
Fucking politics man.
Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 60d
Would you prefer that Farage wins the next UK general election?
Apepollo11@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 60d
Got to echo this.
Unlike the low-stakes infighting nonsense that we often have, this is really important.
Multiple polls have shown that not only is Andy Burnham much more popular than Starmer (big surprise, who isn't?), but that he's more popular than Farage. And that is a big deal, because almost nobody else is.
He's an attractive choice for the left, and he's attractive for Northerners who want change - two camps which Starmer has well and truly lost.
tenebrisnox@feddit.uk · 5 pts · 60d
Are any of the Left still in the Labour Party?
Apepollo11@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 60d
I meant the general population, really.
I live in a place where, realistically, the next MP is going to be Labour or Reform. I'm a member of the Green Party, but I'd vote Labour if Burnham was leading it. I wouldn't at the moment.
tenebrisnox@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 60d
That's a fair and sensible position.
fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk · 1 pts · 60d
Not really... but I bet there's quite a lot who'll simply follow the current party line, so if the Labour leader were to steer things leftwards towards the centre (or ideally past it), many of them would follow it.
tenebrisnox@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 60d
Starmer stood for Labour leadership on a considerably lefter platform than the vague stuff Burnham's been saying. Burnham as PM isn't going to change Labour's current policies. He might be better at campaigning. When people realise that nothing's going to change, helped by the rightwing press, they'll turn on him too.
Apepollo11@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 60d
The difference is that he's got form.
I, like most people here (Manchester), voted against having a mayor in the first place. When the Tories made the position anyway, I voted against Andy Burnham.
But he's absolutely won me over. In the time he's been mayor, directly because of his policies, Manchester has improved dramatically.
Starmer promised a lot, but Burnham has actually delivered change already.
llamatron@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 60d
No of course not.
It just seems like their time could be better spent dealing with problems instead of infighting. Then maybe the deluded fools who've fallen for the Farage con would wake up.
But that's wishful thinking. I'm old enough and cynical enough to see how little really changes. The rich still get richer with the rest fighting over an ever shrinking slice of the pie while politicians tinker around the edges.
Skua@kbin.earth · 7 pts · 60d
This is getting reported much more than the other by-elections that happened specifically because this one is quite likely to bring about a significant change in the UK's national politics