Off to a great start! They are trying to lose right? That’s the goal? Just making sure. Cuz if not all of this is the dumbest fucking thing they could have done.
Wait, I thought we all agreed titles like "Project YYYY" felt totalitarian and too reminiscent of Stalin's 5 Year Plans for comfort.
Personally, I felt the "Deal" moniker was a good one (Square Deal, New Deal), even if the Green New Deal felt derivative and should have been called just "The Green Deal".
Anyway, stop making political initiatives sound like they're coming from the bad guys.
Edit: oh, its just a censorship initiative to pRoTeCt ThE cHiLdReN. Maybe leaning into the "bad guys" feel of the label is what they should be doing.
6 Comments
TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip · 24 pts · 70d
Off to a great start! They are trying to lose right? That’s the goal? Just making sure. Cuz if not all of this is the dumbest fucking thing they could have done.
harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 pts · 70d
Don't worry. I'm sure they'll do something even dumber.
diffaldo@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 70d
That is the plan.
therealdries@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 pts · 70d
FTFY. See how easy it is to make yourself relevant again, legacy media?
DahGangalang@infosec.pub · 14 pts · 70d
Wait, I thought we all agreed titles like "Project YYYY" felt totalitarian and too reminiscent of Stalin's 5 Year Plans for comfort.
Personally, I felt the "Deal" moniker was a good one (Square Deal, New Deal), even if the Green New Deal felt derivative and should have been called just "The Green Deal".
Anyway, stop making political initiatives sound like they're coming from the bad guys.
Edit: oh, its just a censorship initiative to pRoTeCt ThE cHiLdReN. Maybe leaning into the "bad guys" feel of the label is what they should be doing.
buliarous@piefed.social · 10 pts · 70d
Really hoping this is just click bait bullshit and not reality