prorule

627 points · 35 comments · view on lemmy.world

35 Comments

alekwithak@lemmy.world · 79 pts · 34d (2 replies)

Know what? Fair.

pentastarm@piefed.ca · 42 pts · 34d (1 reply)

enchantedgoldapple@sopuli.xyz · 12 pts · 34d

Few word enough, lot word not

Zachariah@lemmy.world · 76 pts · 34d (2 replies)

dude uses amateur nouns I guess

Quokka@quokk.au · 26 pts · 34d

Noobnouns

fartographer@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 34d

Took me a minute. I had to come back to upvote this

GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 37 pts · 34d (1 reply)

If I'm just trying to unwind and have a good time I stick to casual nouns. But when it's time to lock in I go with ranked competitive nouns.

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 3 pts · 34d

Sweat nouns are the worst!

cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 35 pts · 34d (3 replies)

the only good and acceptable pronoun joke is hobbes saying "a noun that lost it's amateur status" :3

SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org · 11 pts · 34d (2 replies)

No it's not, because I'm too daft to get it. Checkmate

mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 34d (1 reply)

::: spoiler The joke the noun is no longer an amateur it went pro, so now it's a pronoun. :::

cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone · 13 pts · 34d

and the comic in question (i was on my phone last night, sorry)

a calvin and hobbes strip. calvin says i need help on my homework whar's a pronoun. hobbes says a noun that lost its amateur status. calvin looks straight ahead while hobbes looks pleased. calvin says maybe i can get a point for originality

sushi@thelemmy.club · 28 pts · 34d (3 replies)

he uses nonouns

frigge@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 34d (2 replies)

after i accidentally use the wrong pronoun i just add a contranoun which annihilates the pronoun resulting in a nonoun!

EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 34d (1 reply)

Yes but this releases a burst of energy that destroys the conversation.

zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 33d

This is getting really technical. I'm half expecting you to tell me that there is something called Quantum Semantics that has totally different rules for nouns and pronouns and all the rules change.

strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 27 pts · 34d (4 replies)

Hard to not use pronounce, think. Very difficult. What should say? Can't think of examples. Think, therefore am.

kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 33d (3 replies)

kolmaskommentoija notes strawberry_enjoyer42 can just use strawberry_enjoyer42's name or some different noun descriptor as a replacement, so no pronouns needed

strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 pts · 33d (2 replies)

true. strawberry thinks, therefore strawberry is.

kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 33d (1 reply)

Also, perhaps ironically, because Latin is an agglutinative language, the original "cogito, ergo sum" does not have pronouns either. The -o ending in cogit-o, tells it is "I" who thinks, and "sum" tells it is "I" who is ("being" being completely irregular verb). So it is "(I) think, so (I) am".

strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 33d

It's so neat :3 It's survived into modern Latin languages, like Italian and Spanish. It kinda exists in English, since you can frequently drop some pronouns, but the person-perspective (there's gotta be a proper word for that) not encoded in the other words.

For example, one might shorten "I love you" to simply "love you", or in questions, such as "are you enjoying your food?" being shortened to "enjoying your food?"

isyasad@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 34d (2 replies)

If you can understand the last sentence then you now understand how Japanese functions despite omitting pronouns 90% of the time

morto@piefed.social · 16 pts · 34d (1 reply)

Now speaking japanese will be added to the woke list

somethingsnappy@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 34d

It will be added to the asleep list.

NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone · 8 pts · 34d (1 reply)

Pronouns are a crutch. Real bros let their actions speak.

gray@lemmy.ml · 8 pts · 34d

Real bros let _ actions speak.

Mac@mander.xyz · 7 pts · 34d

Mac refuses to pay for the pro subscription and therefore only has access to normal tier nouns.

alapakala@quokk.au · 7 pts · 34d (2 replies)

Speaketh for the self, for this one does not

What if stoodarion becameth apothipronominal as this writer has?🤔

abrake@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 34d (1 reply)

Speaketh for the self, for this one does not

I don't think this is even a good example. "Self" is usually treated as a reflexive pronoun, although I'm not sure if it still counts as one if you say "the self." And "this" is a demonstrative pronoun. And "one," as it used in this sentence is an indefinite pronoun.

alapakala@quokk.au · 3 pts · 34d

Those could be used as pronouns indeed, but “self” here is a noun, even if reflexive. Could have used “this writer” instead of “one,” but wanting easier for reading diction (✕⍯) choose. “This” is a demonstrative determiner/adjectives, pointing to the nouns perspectives.

TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website · 5 pts · 34d
zitrone@europe.pub · 1 pts · 34d (2 replies)

just use names tbh, thats what names are for

EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 34d (1 reply)

No then everyone would realize how often I forget their names.

RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 33d

Even your own, it would seem!

joe@lemmy.today · 1 pts · 31d

"self" in this context is a pronoun.