Blanche admits he probably won't prosecute Epstein affiliated abuses after he made a deal and met with Epstein accusers

“It wasn’t all cordial,” Blanche said of Thursday’s meeting. “Because there’s something that they want that I don’t think I can give them, which is some form of justice.

Dude, you're in asking to be in charge of the Department of Justice. It's literally your only job to give them justice.

Did anybody ever think these people would prosecute themselves or the hand that feeds them?

The sole thing I care about in this kind of confirm-me political theater is what the victims think of it, and they're not happy:

One accuser, Dani Bensky, expressed frustration after the meeting, saying Blanche appeared to treat it as “a mere ‘check-the-box’ exercise intended to secure votes for his confirmation.”

“He danced around his wording, repeatedly interrupted us and could not commit to anything that would demonstrate good faith or begin to restore trust,” she said in an emailed statement. She said Blanche offered “no credible plan to investigate and pursue accountability” beyond Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein.

Earlier Thursday, Bensky told lawmakers on the Senate Judiciary Committee that women harmed by Epstein repeatedly asked to meet with Blanche “through multiple channels and he never responded.”

“We deserve to be heard directly, not dismissed and ignored,” Bensky said.

I'm also thinking back to all the times Blanche said he couldn't meet with victims directly, but he could meet with their attorneys: he's still Trump's personal attorney, just like he said in his confirmation hearing, and is still thinking of this meeting in those terms.

(For those who are not aware of how that works in US law, if you are an attorney for someone involved or potentially involved in a lawsuit, like Blanche is on Trump's behalf as his personal attorney, then it is against legal rules to personally meet with others who are or might be involved in such lawsuits -- but you can meet with their attorneys. That's why Blanche kept coming back to "if they have counsel, I can meet with their counsel.")

I don't have high hopes, but I'm still hoping Cornyn's pissed off enough about the Trump-branded knife in his own back to vote no on this hopped-up ambulance chaser's confirmation.

I'm a Republican Voter and NOT Prosecuting RICH CHILD RAPISTS is NOT a Red Line for me! As LONG as Trans kids are Scared I'm OK with Rich People HAVING SEX WITH CHILDREN ON PRIVATE ISLANDS! LITERALLY!

Somehow other countries can prosecute their Epstein Pedophiles, but we can't.

Actually, I understand. Just having your name on an email, and even a few salacious snippets, aren't enough to convict anybody for anything. But if we've got an email exchange, and it's clear they're talking about little girls, it doesn't matter if we can prosecute or not, we are still well within our rights to shun that person, and make their life in our society miserable. Nobody should hire them, do business with them, be their friend, invite them to parties, let their kids play with our kids, etc.

Whenever their name pops up in the media for any reason, it should always be mentioned that they were prominently mentioned in the Epstein Files, but there wasn't enough evidence for a conviction.

And they should definitely NEVER hold any kind of public office. They should be afraid to come out from under their rock.

Country where this started can't believe in prosecuting it...

Oh wow. What a surprising turn of events. 🙄

If E. Jean Carroll can get some kind of civil restitution, then let them have that too.

Release the files and let them be admitted into evidence and read on the news and all that.

Maybe a unpopular opinion but this might be a okay thing.

Sure this Shitty Republican Christian, SA enabler won't be prosecuting now but it does have the door open for a progressive to prosecute them instead of having this Shitty Republican Christian throw the cases and attach double jeopardy.