cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/46376556
What a way to indoctrinate the mass public by proclaiming that AI is ‘for all’.
Hey, if AI is for all, here‘s a suggestion: stop putting AI models up behind a paywall or subscription.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/46376556
What a way to indoctrinate the mass public by proclaiming that AI is ‘for all’.
Hey, if AI is for all, here‘s a suggestion: stop putting AI models up behind a paywall or subscription.
27 Comments
Miller@lemmy.world · 28 pts · 27d
Read that again, giving ChatGPT 'unlimited access to free users'.
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 27d
Gonna go ahead and guess that they will still have at least one model behind some sort of paywall/subscription?
The thing about these companies is, whenever they bring out a ‘new, innovative’ AI, they tend to just pawn off the old models for free, knowing full well that it’s shit in comparison. In other words: they charge you for the ‘good’ stuff whilst taking a shit on you. And somehow, they’ve framed it as an amazing thing… and people eat it up like cereal.
ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip · 6 pts · 27d
This is mostly because they train the models on your chats, so they want to get as much chat history as they can.
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 27d
Sickening methodology. They should be ashamed.
unpossum@sh.itjust.works · -2 pts · 27d
According to you, all AI is shit, so why does it matter?
naught101@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 27d
Like, to eat?
brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 26 pts · 27d
This is for their IPO.
Gotta hype and pump.
...And FYI, the spectacular drop after the IPO will be coming out of y'all's retirement accounts.
Witchfire@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 26d
Our what accounts?
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 27d
😭😭😭
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip · 13 pts · 27d
They can't even afford their current paying user base... Aren't they months from insolvency at their burn rate?
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 27d
I hope so
inari@piefed.zip · 10 pts · 27d
That can't be good for their already worrisome finances
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 27d
Don’t bother me. AI is shit. It’s not even intelligent. It’s not even true AI. It’s a waste. Let it die.
unpossum@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 27d
That’s sort of what they did? Luna seems to be mostly on par with gpt-5.4, which was SOTA half a year ago
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 27d
With one model, yes, but why not all models if they’re serious?
itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world · 11 pts · 27d
They're not serious, but also, this doesn't seem like a viable economic structure. More like they're trying to pump user numbers while losing even more annually than they already are in some last-ditch push to get the last out of their investors.
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 27d
I sure hope it is dying like that.
P00ptart@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 27d
And hopefully before an IPO.
Triumph@fedia.io · 1 pts · 27d
We've had one model, but what about second model?
mrfriki@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 27d
Really have to be desperate for Puerto use their slop if they are doing it.
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 pts · 27d
I think this might be my favourite comment today so far 🤣
mrfriki@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 27d
Jesus, if took me half a minute to figure out what those words were supposed to be 😅
SouthFresh@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 27d
Altman is full of shit Everything he says is a lie.
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 27d
TheAntiAiLeader@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 27d
👍
kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 26d
DeepSeek just released a model that is much cheaper to run and performs just as well as most GPT and Claude models. This is their reaction to try limit the damage from DeepSeek.
daannii@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 27d
Trying so hard to get people dependent on their AI so they will pay for it later.