Meta Just Paid Nearly $17 Billion To Make Sure It Gets To Write The Kid Safety Rules For Every Other Social Media Platform
https://www.techdirt.com/2026/08/26/meta-just-paid-nearly-17-billion-to-make-sure-it-gets-to-write-the-kid-safety-rules-for-every-other-social-media-platform/
359 points · 30 comments · view on lemmy.world
30 Comments
General_Effort@lemmy.world · 42 pts · 20h
That story contains a list of features agreed on in the settlement ( https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.401490/gov.uscourts.cand.401490.3447.1.pdf ). I'm seeing a lot of disinfo here about what this lawsuit was about.
officermike@lemmy.world · 33 pts · 20h
While I appreciate that they intend to block extreme makeup or cosmetic surgery filters, I don't see anything about blocking AI-generated content that could be similarly harmful.
General_Effort@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 19h
There's this:
This means suppressing looksmaxxing, or ana-mia, but also discussions of mental health, or trans issues. Suppressing deviant ideas is certainly the main point. If that will help with anorexia and such issues is doubtful, as far as I know.
FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 12 pts · 20h
In other words they want age verification laws so they can make their dangerous addictive product less addictive for teens specifically?
General_Effort@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 19h
Not really.
Say, which features would you like for yourself? One could include them in Fediverse clients.
Weep@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 18h
100% the non algorithmic feed, they word it as only being available to teens. I want that, and I'm old.
General_Effort@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 17h
Lemmy already has that. Or are you looking for non-personalized recommendations?
village604@adultswim.fan · 1 pts · 6h
No! Algorithm bad because reasons.
Sorting by hot or active is an algorithm. Hell, sorting by post recency is too.
FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 15h
No infinite scrolling is a big one, making one have to manually go to the next page of content helps add natural break points.
lmmarsano@group.lt · 7 pts · 9h
So, more powergrabs by the state to force these invasive anti-features down everyone's throats.
I really despise the suckers falling for thin pretexts of "child safety" & "mental health" as excuses to assault our liberties and the free flow of information with measures enabling authorities to more closely track & control our activities on information systems of all things.
Lojcs@piefed.social · 4 pts · 19h
Am I reading this incorrectly or is Meta mandated by the settlement to lobby for age assurance legistaltion?
General_Effort@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 19h
I think it's more the states/governments that are expected to force the same onto Meta's competitors.
verifiedbyme@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 17h
Using an app that lets me block apps on my device with built-in safety features to stop me from cheating, I’ve finally got a hold of my social media usage (and going away from Instagram and Reddit, that helped too). Thing is, I’m a grown-ass adult, and it still was that hard for me to do it. Two hours a day is still so much fucking time. And across two services, too, there is three more social media channels they can spend 2 hours each on and suddenly you spent 8 hours a day online. This agreement is shit.
lmmarsano@group.lt · 1 pts · 9h
The self-control issues you wrote about seem a you problem. I don't imagine any agreement out there fixing that unless we assume we can't treat you like an autonomous adult making grown-ass choices when you know what you're getting into, so an authority must step in to stop you from yourself. Surrendering that to authority frankly goes against the social contract that respects individuals' basic liberties.
ryper@lemmy.ca · 2 pts · 17h
And this gist of the article is that a lot of that would violate the First Amendment if the government forced Meta to do it, and putting it in a settlement instead of a law and making it an "industry standard" is just a way for the government to get around that.
schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 20h
Wait...so we... w-w-w-won?
DampSquid@feddit.uk · 19 pts · 20h
We did not.
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 33 pts · 19h
No they didn’t. It’s to be paid over 10 years
General_Effort@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 19h
It's also only $5B unless...
Yeah, the headline is bad. But the story contains fairly good information and analysis.
ryper@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 17h
The $5B is the conditional bit:
darthsundhaft@piefed.social · 12 pts · 10h
Unrelated but despite this superficial win, Zuckerbeg still had enough money to buy an Irish castle. Like WTF dude. All these stupid billionaires need to be sunk in a sub.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 20h
Beats parenting.
cannedtuna@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 20h
Dude you have no clue how fucking hard it is to keep kids away from this shit.
“Well just parent better”
Man you can try but kids just love making bad decisions and finding ways around blocks and filters left and right. Like I’m over letting my kid have anything more technical than two tin cups with some string.
Iteria@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 10h
IDK, I have a kid and nowadays there is OS level filters. Router level filters. The only wah my kid is getting around this stuff is if they guess my password. I mean.. Good luck my password vault password is over 20 characters long and I don't even know the others as a result.
My experience as a parent is parents telling themselves it's too hard too too complicated to do the basics like turn on parental controls and configure it. I can't do anything if my kid looks at YouTube, plays roblox or whatever on some other kid's device, but at least I can do harm reduction same my parents and the harm of the day.
I hate these laws because often I'm forced to either allow my kid access to everything or nothing not even the stuff I want to teach her slowly how to safely use. These laws are the worst because I lost control because other parents can't be bothered to turn on baked in parental controls, have decent passwords and/or listen to whining.
DeadDigger@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 2h
That's just to Unterkomplex. Ppl are genuinely unable to do router based blocking
cannedtuna@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 8h
Nah. Look, see, I put blocks on a lot of shit. Screentime to limit how much time he gets, no safari access or other browser, contact limits, etc. won’t go into the whole background of why, but look.
First it was Spotify. Kid was dead tired mid day and come to find out when I check Screentime it’s cause he was up till like 3 or 4 am on Spotify and finally figured out it’s not cause he was falling asleep to it, no he found out there’s videos on it and watching them all hours. This was a while back.
The. recently I find he’s constantly asking for access to this fucking TCG app, and he’s obsessed with Pokémon and all about selling cards and shit. Turns out that because the apps just a shitty wrapper he’s using it to get on Reddit and DM’ing rando’s and shit because he is the kind of kid to text a number he found on the floor, no joke.
Then removing that he figures he can just use fucking maps to open a safari sub window and have free web access.
Fuck sakes like kinda impressed at the finding holes, but also he’s a god damn drug addict after anything he can get his hands on. Hence the reason I’m ready to hand him two tin cans with string.
Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 3h
Not trying to tell you to parent better, shit's hard, but I see two possible things that might help.
First, any device he uses should be filtered from the open internet on router level with a white list of approved things he can access.
And second, you really need to talk with him about it. Why it's a bad idea to text numbers of the floor, how cards are gambling and how specifically gabling will ruin his life and about addiction and how almost everything on the internet is designed to create it and abuse it. These would be long and not just once conversations with examples and reiterations because the subjects are complex and he will need a long time to process and absorb all that.
Good luck!
WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 4h
then take away their fucking phone. they can call you with a dumb phone. they earned it. they may get back their phone in 2 weeks, until then, there's the computer.
dan1101@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 18h
The day I take any advice from Meta is the day I'd close my business for good.
LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net · 8 pts · 18h
Children benefit from online anonymity. Destroying their anonymity harms children.