Substack & Twitter

99 points · 19 comments · view on lemmy.world

19 Comments

blunderworld@lemmy.ca · 16 pts · 1d (7 replies)

I haven't used substack, but I've never heard any negative discourse about it either. A lot of Nazis on there I guess?

nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz · 21 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Substack faced further criticism in November 2023 for allowing its platform to be used by white nationalists, Nazis, and antisemites.[61] In an open letter, more than 100 Substack creators threatened to leave the platform[62] and implored Substack's leadership to stop giving bigotry a platform.[63] In response, Substack co-founder Hamish McKenzie said the company would continue to allow the publication of extremist views because attempting to censor them would make the problem worse.[11][64]

From their Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substack

crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 1d
JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social · 5 pts · 1d

I don't know much about Substack, but there are some killer blogs there. For example Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's.

https://kareem.substack.com/

nigel@piefed.social · 2 pts · 1d (2 replies)

I'm curious too, is this about the owners or the writers?

pieberry@lemmy.today · 6 pts · 1d (1 reply)

The CEO did an interview on The Verge with Nilay Patel and refused to say that he would take Nazi content off the platform, taking an 'absolute free-speech, nothing is censored' approach.

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

But I have no idea how many nazis post on Substack.

JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social · 3 pts · 1d

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

No tolerance for intolerance is a principle which he seems to be whiffing on. Or maybe it's as simple as significantly more profit for him by turning a blind eye.

tquid@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 1d
ArgentRaven@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Do you mean x.com? Because someone registered the expired Twitter name and is building Twitter.now as a replacement for What the old Twitter became.

GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip · 4 pts · 1d

Yeah but it's just another corpo take. They basically came right out and said we got investors, we got a business plan, we wanna make some money.

DahGangalang@infosec.pub · 4 pts · 1d (1 reply)

Suppose I've heard a lot of talk trashing Substack, but what alternatives exist?

As a non-user who doesn't do much of anything in that space, seems like they're one of the few ways to distribute newsletters and such to emails en masse.

DougHolland@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 1d

Other options include Ghost, Beehiv, Wordpress, Blogger, self-publishing, on and on. Nobody's forced to hang out with Nazis; it's a choice.

Spider89@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 1d (5 replies)

I've just heard of Substack, what's wrong with it?

pieberry@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 1d

The CEO did an interview on The Verge with Nilay Patel and refused to say that he would take Nazi content off the platform, taking an 'absolute free-speech, nothing is censored' approach.

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

DougHolland@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 1d

Substack has a Nazi problem

The newsletter-hosting site Substack advertises itself as the last, best hope for civility on the internet—and aspires to a bigger role in politics in 2024. But just beneath the surface, the platform has become a home and propagator of white supremacy and anti-Semitism. Substack has not only been hosting writers who post overtly Nazi rhetoric on the platform; it profits from many of them.

emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 1d

Nothing as far as I know. It has some of the most thoughtful news / opinion channels I've read. But OP seems to hate it per their bio.

greenbit@lemmy.zip · 0 pts · 1d (1 reply)

The image shows it

Spider89@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 1d

Oh, majority are Nazis..